Myocardial revascularization before carotid endarterectomy.

Diffuse atherosclerosis involving more than 1 vascular bed is a challenging problem. The natural histories of carotid and coronary atherosclerosis are clearly intertwined. The optimal strategies for treatment of patients who present with carotid artery stenoses and co-existent coronary artery disease (CAD) remain controversial. Minimally invasive screening tests for CAD are often unreliable, and patients presenting with significant extracranial carotid artery stenoses should usually be assumed to harbor some degree of CAD. Numerous studies have confirmed, however, that in contrast to peripheral artery stenoses, hemodynamically significant stenoses of the coronary arteries are not necessarily the index lesions that produce myocardial infarctions (MIs). Although there are some anecdotal reports that myocardial revascularization prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) improves the short- and long-term cardiac outcomes of patients after CEA, no prospective, randomized, controlled studies have proven this hypothesis. Numerous adverse cardiac events can occur in the perioperative period including congestive heart failure (CHF), arrhythmias, unstable angina pectoris and both nonfatal and fatal MIs. Of these, only MIs are truly "hard" endpoints. The incidence of MI after CEA is much lower than after other commonly performed peripheral arterial operations such as aortic or infrainguinal procedures. The perioperative nonfatal and fatal MI rates after CEA average about 1.0% and 0.4%, respectively. The Coronary Artery Revascularization Prophylaxis (CARP) study is currently ongoing in the United States as a multicentered randomized prospective controlled trial sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In this study, patients with significant CAD who are undergoing operations for peripheral arterial disease are randomized to myocardial revascularization versus best medical care; however, CEA procedures are excluded from this study because cardiac morbidity is low. Based on the low incidence of adverse cardiac events in CEA patients, it is generally prudent to treat their CAD with best medical care rather than routine prophylactic myocardial revascularization.

How to avoid cardiac ischemic events associated with aortic surgery.

Whereas there is some degree of coronary artery disease (CAD) in most patients undergoing vascular surgery, there is no consensus regarding how to avoid perioperative cardiac ischemic events. Although this edition of Seminars in Vascular Surgery is devoted to aortic surgery, it must be remembered that the incidence of adverse cardiac outcomes after infrainguinal operations is at least as great as after aortic procedures. Thus, much of the information discussed herein will be applicable to patients undergoing all varieties of vascular surgery. Numerous strategies exist for preoperative cardiac testing before vascular operations. These strategies range from routine evaluation before surgery to a "minimalist" approach, treating all patients as though CAD was present. Although advocates of various algorithms often are unwavering in their convictions, there are no randomized, prospective studies comparing different strategies for evaluation and management of patients with CAD undergoing vascular surgery. Potential adverse effects of evaluation and cardiac intervention should be considered before undertaking screening studies. The authors analyzed the adverse outcomes of preoperative cardiac evaluation and intervention before vascular operations in patients treated at the Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Of 153 patients undergoing vascular procedures, 42 had extended cardiac evaluations. Sixteen (38%) patients had untoward events related to this evaluation. Extensive cardiac evaluation before vascular operations can result in morbidity, delays, and refusal to undergo vascular surgery. The underlying indication for vascular operations and the local iatrogenic cardiac complication rates should be considered before ordering special studies. Several recent randomized, prospective studies have established that perioperative beta-adrenergic blockade is beneficial in vascular patients with CAD. Beta-Blocker therapy can reduce the risk of perioperative adverse cardiac outcomes by 55%. The Coronary Artery Revascularization Prophylaxis (CARP) trial currently underway is a multicenter, prospective comparison of invasive intervention for CAD versus best medical care in patients undergoing aortic and lower extremity vascular surgery funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program.

Iatrogenic vascular injuries from percutaneous vascular suturing devices.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the patterns of injury and the strategies of surgical repair of iatrogenic vascular injuries from a percutaneous vascular suturing device after arterial cannulation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical experience from an academic vascular surgical practice over a 2-year period. The subjects were patients undergoing vascular repair of iatrogenic vascular injury after deployment of a percutaneous vascular suturing device. Interventions were direct repair of arterial injury (with or without device extraction) or arterial thrombectomy and repair. The main outcome variables included patterns of arterial injury, magnitude of arterial repair, limb salvage, hospital stay, and perioperative mortality and morbidity rates. RESULTS: From August 1998 through August 2000, eight patients (4 men, 4 women; median age, 55 years; range, 44-80 years) required vascular operations for complications of percutaneous suturing devices after diagnostic (2) or therapeutic (6) arteriograms through a transfemoral approach. Complications included four pseudoaneurysms (1 infected) due to arterial tear from suture pull through, two entrapped closure devices due to device malfunction, and two arterial thromboses due to narrowing/severe intimal dissection. All patients required operative intervention. Direct suture repair with or without device removal was performed in five patients, arterial debridement with vein patch angioplasty in one patient, and arterial thrombectomy and vein patch angioplasty in two patients. There were no perioperative deaths. The median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 2-33). Limbs were salvaged in all patients with a mean follow-up of 4.8 months (range, 1-13). CONCLUSIONS: Although abbreviated postangiography recovery periods and early ambulation have motivated the widespread use of percutaneous suturing devices, the infrequent occurrence of vascular injuries produced by these devices can be significantly more challenging than simple acute pseudoaneurysms or hemorrhage. In addition, thrombotic complications have a small but finite risk of limb loss.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the common femoral vein: Case report and review of the literature.

A young competitive skier had venous claudication. A stenosis of the left common femoral vein was revealed by means of an examination. Exploration and vein patch angioplasty were performed, and because of both the unusual appearance (focal thickening of vein wall) and the unclear etiology of the lesion, frozen and permanent sections of the wall were obtained. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, a rare intravascular sarcoma, was revealed by means of an examination of the permanent sections. Two additional procedures were required to completely excise the epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. We discuss these rare vascular malignancies and include a review of the available literature. Also, oncologic principles important in both the diagnosis and therapy of intravascular sarcomas are discussed.

Cost for inpatient care of venous thrombosis: a trial of enoxaparin vs standard heparin.

BACKGROUND: Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin administered to hospitalized patients once or twice daily, has shown efficacy and safety equivalent to unfractionated heparin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolic disease. Although the cost of either enoxaparin regimen is greater than that of unfractionated heparin, the overall cost of care for each of these 3 treatment strategies is unknown. METHODS: A cost minimization analysis of a 3-month, partially blinded, randomized, controlled efficacy and safety trial of anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis. Three hundred thirty-nine hospitalized patients with symptomatic lower extremity deep vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to initial therapy with subcutaneous enoxaparin either once (n = 112) or twice (n = 123) daily, or with dose-adjusted intravenous unfractionated heparin (n = 104), followed by long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. Estimated 1997 total cost from a third-party payer perspective for the 3-month episode of care was calculated by assigning standard unit costs to counts of medical resources used by each patient in the clinical trial. RESULTS: Average total cost for the 3-month episode of care was similar across all 3 treatment regimens: once-daily dose of enoxaparin, $12,166 (95% confidence interval [CI], $10,744-$13,588); twice-daily dose of enoxaparin, $11,558 (95% CI, $10,201-$12,915); and unfractionated heparin, $12,146 (95% CI, $10,670-$12,622). Bootstrapped estimates and sensitivity analyses did not significantly change findings. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the overall cost for the 3-month episode of care for patients treated with either enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. Additional acquisition costs for anticoagulant medication among patients treated with enoxaparin were offset by savings associated with lower incidence of hospital readmission and shorter duration of venous thromboembolism-related readmissions.

Yield of repeated screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm after a 4-year interval. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the rate at which new abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) develop or whether screening older men for AAA, if undertaken, should be limited to once in a lifetime or repeated at intervals. METHODS: A large population of veterans, aged 50 through 79 years, completed a questionnaire and underwent ultrasound screening for AAA. Of these, 5151 without AAA on the initial ultrasound (defined as infrarenal aortic diameter of 3.0 cm or larger) were selected randomly to be invited for a second ultrasound screening after an interval of 4 years. Local records and national databases were searched to identify deaths and AAA diagnoses made during the study interval in subjects who did not attend the rescreening. RESULTS: Of the 5151 subjects selected for a second screening, 598 (11.6%) had died (none due to AAA), and 20 (0.4%) had an interim diagnosis of AAA. A second screening was performed on 2622 (50.9%), of whom 58 (2.2%; 95% confidence interval, 1.6%-2.8%) had new AAA. Three new AAAs were 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 10 were 3.5 to 3.9 cm, and 45 were 3.0 to 3.4 cm. Independent predictors of new AAA at the second screening included current smoker (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence, 1.74-5.50), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.07), and, in a separate model using a composite variable, any atherosclerosis (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.35). Adding the interim and rescreening diagnosis rates suggests a 4-year incidence rate of 2.6%. Rescreening only in subjects with infrarenal aortic diameter of 2.5 cm or greater on the initial ultrasound would have missed more than two thirds of the new AAAs. CONCLUSIONS: A second screening is of little practical value after 4 years, mainly because the AAAs detected are small. However, the incidence that we observed suggests that a second screening after longer intervals (ie, more than 8 years) may provide yields similar to those seen in initial screening and therefore warrants further study.

Negative impact of cardiac evaluation before vascular surgery.

The optimal preoperative evaluation of cardiac risk in patients with peripheral vascular disease is controversial. In developing a paradigm for preoperative cardiac workup, potential adverse effects of evaluation and cardiac intervention must be considered. This study analyzed the deleterious outcomes of extensive, comprehensive cardiac evaluation and intervention before planned vascular surgery in patients treated at the Denver Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Over a 12-month period between 1994 and 1995, 161 patients were scheduled to undergo major vascular operations; 153 patients came to operation. The decision to pursue a cardiac evaluation was variously made by a combination of surgeons, cardiologists, and anesthesiologists. No defined protocol was followed. Cardiac history, chest X-rays and ECGs were obtained for all patients. Extended cardiac evaluation included these studies plus special tests, including echocardiography (echo), radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG), dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy (DTS), and cardiac catheterization (CC). Extended cardiac evaluations were undertaken in 42 patients. Complications related to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were also recorded. Cardiac mortality and morbidity after vascular interventions were itemized in all 153 patients. Forty-two male patients, aged 68 +/- 9 years, underwent extended cardiac evaluations before planned vascular operations. The median elapsed time for cardiac workup was 14 days (mean 30 +/- 59 days). The median and mean times from cardiac workup to vascular surgery were 25 days and 76 +/- 142 days, respectively. Eighteen (43%) patients had echo or RNVG; 22 (52%) patients had DTS; 27 (64%) had CC; 9 (21%) had PTCA; 7 (17%) had CABG. Sixteen (38%) patients had untoward events related to cardiac evaluation. Eight patients (19%: one with cerebrovascular disease, and seven with aortic aneurysms) refused vascular surgery after extended cardiac workup. Complications attributable to CC, PTCA, and CABG included prosthetic graft infection, pseudoaneurysms (two), sternal wound infections (two), renal failure and brain anoxia. Two patients with severe limb ischemia who were candidates for revascularization ultimately required amputations because of delay due to cardiac evaluations. Extensive cardiac evaluation prior to vascular operations can result in morbidity, delays, and refusal to undergo vascular surgery. The underlying indication for vascular operations and the local iatrogenic cardiac complication rates must be considered before ordering special studies.

Intermediate-term outcome of primary digit amputations in patients with diabetes mellitus who have forefoot sepsis requiring hospitalization and presumed adequate circulatory status.

PURPOSE: The intermediate success and outcome of primary forefoot amputations in patients with diabetes mellitus who have sepsis limited to the forefoot and presumed adequate forefoot perfusion, as determined by means of noninvasive methods, was studied. METHODS: Cases of a university hospital-based practice from January 1984 to April 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients included had diabetes mellitus with forefoot sepsis requiring immediate hospitalization for digit amputations who had adequate arterial circulation for healing based on noninvasive and clinical assessment: palpable pedal pulses (29%), "compressible" ankle pressure of 70 mm Hg or higher (48%), pulsatile metatarsal waveforms (67%), and/or toe pressure higher than 55 mm Hg (36%). All patients underwent a primary single- or multiple-digit amputation (through the interphalangeal joint, metatarsal head, or metatarsal shaft). Additional forefoot procedures (debridement, digit amputation) were performed during the follow-up period as needed for persistent or recurrent infection. The main outcome variables were recurrent or persistent foot infection (defined as requiring rehospitalization for antibiotics, wound care, and/or reoperation), the number of repeat operations and hospitalizations for salvage of limbs with recurrent or persistent infections, and time to complete forefoot healing or foot amputation. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients who had diabetes mellitus with 97 forefoot infections comprised the study group. Ninety-seven primary digit amputations (34 through interphalangeal joints, 28 through metatarsal heads, 35 through metatarsal shafts) were performed. The median length of hospital stay was 10 days. There were no operative deaths. The mean follow-up period was 21 months (range, 3 days to 105 months). The primary amputation healed (without persistent infection) in only 38 limbs (39%), at a mean time of 13 +/- 10 weeks. Twenty-three limbs (24%) had not healed the primary amputation without evidence of persistent infection at last follow-up (mean, 12 weeks). Infection persisted in 35 limbs (36%), and infection recurred in 15 of 38 (40%) healed limbs. An average of 1.0 reoperations (range, 0 to 3) and 1.6 rehospitalizations (range, 1 to 4) were involved in salvage attempts in these recurrent/persistent infections. Five persistent and five recurrent infections ultimately healed (mean, 53 weeks). Complete healing was achieved in only 33 of 97 limbs (34%). Twenty-two foot amputations (20 transtibial, two Syme's) were performed (mean, 49 +/- 74 weeks; 20 for persistent infection). Eighteen persistent/recurrent infections remained unhealed at the last follow-up examination (mean, 105 weeks). CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes mellitus who have sepsis limited to the forefoot requiring acute hospitalization and undergoing primary digit amputations have a high incidence of intermediate-term, persistent, and recurrent infection, leading to a modest rate of limb loss, despite having apparently salvageable lesions and noninvasive evidence of presumed adequate forefoot perfusion.

Prophylactic coronary artery revascularization for elective vascular surgery: study design. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Coronary Artery Revascularization Prophylaxis for Elective Vascular Surgery.

This article describes the design of an ongoing randomized trial intended to test whether patients who require elective vascular surgery would benefit from preoperative coronary artery revascularization prior to the vascular procedure. The primary objective is to determine whether coronary artery revascularization reduces long-term mortality (mean 3.5 years) in patients undergoing vascular surgery. The study design calls for 620 patients to be randomized and followed for a mean of 3.5 years following vascular surgery. Secondary endpoints include measures of quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Patients with coronary artery disease in need of an elective vascular operation are considered candidates for the study. Anatomic exclusion criteria include ejection fraction <20%, severe aortic stenosis (valve area <1.0 cm2), left main stenosis > or =50%, nonobstructive coronary artery disease (stenosis <70%), and coronary arteries that are not amenable to revascularization. Prior to the vascular surgery, the trial randomizes eligible patients to coronary artery revascularization (either bypass surgery or angioplasty) versus medical therapy. The trial stratifies the randomization by hospital and type of vascular surgery (intraabdominal versus infrainguinal) because of differences in long-term prognosis in those patients. A 1-year feasibility trial involving five Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers of variable vascular surgical loads has been completed. The results showed that over 90% of expected patients could be randomized. As a result, a larger VA Cooperative Study involving 18 centers will begin recruitment of patients. The findings should help determine the best strategy for managing patients with coronary artery disease in need of elective vascular surgery.

Thrombophilia and activated protein C resistance.

In addition to classic vascular insults such as inflammation, trauma, malignancy, and surgery, a number of hereditary coagulation defects predispose patients to a wide array of thrombotic complications. A novel genetic defect in factor V allowing for resistance to its cleavage by activated protein C has recently been implicated in a significant number of cases of familial thrombophilia. A brief case report and review of the literature is presented to familiarize surgeons to this important and quite frequent cause of hypercoagulability.

Contemporary management of isolated iliac aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Because isolated common iliac artery aneurysms are infrequent, are difficult to detect and treat, and have traditionally been associated with high operative mortality rates in reported series, we analyzed the outcomes of operative repair of 31 isolated common iliac artery aneurysms in 21 patients to ascertain morbidity and mortality rates with contemporary techniques of repair. METHODS: A retrospective review study was conducted in a university teaching hospital and a Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Perioperative mortality and operative morbidity rates were examined in 17 men and four women with isolated common iliac artery aneurysms between 1984 and 1997. Ages ranged from 38 to 87 years (mean 69 +/- 8 years). Slightly more than half of the cases were symptomatic, with abdominal pain, neurologic, claudicative, genitourinary, or hemodynamic symptoms. One aneurysm had ruptured and one was infected. There was one iliac artery-iliac vein fistula. All aneurysms involved the common iliac artery. Coexistent unilateral or bilateral external iliac aneurysms were present in four patients; there were three accompanying internal iliac aneurysms. Overall, 52% of patients had unilateral aneurysms and 48% had bilateral aneurysms. Aneurysms ranged in maximal diameter from 2.5 to 12 cm (mean 5.6 +/- 2 cm). No patients were unavailable for follow-up, which averaged 5.5 years. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent direct operative repair of isolated iliac aneurysms. One patient had placement of an endoluminal covered stent graft; another patient at high risk had percutaneous placement of coils within the aneurysm to occlude it in conjunction with a femorofemoral bypass graft. Patients with bilateral aneurysms underwent aortoiliac or aortofemoral interposition grafts, whereas unilateral aneurysms were managed with local interposition grafts. There were no deaths in the perioperative period. Only one elective operation (5%) resulted in a significant complication, compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy. The patient treated with the covered stent required femorofemoral bypass when the stent occluded 1 week after the operation. The patient treated with coil occlusion of a large common iliac aneurysm died 2 years later when the aneurysm ruptured. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated iliac artery aneurysms can be managed with much lower mortality and morbidity rates than aneurysm previously been reported by using a systematic operative approach. Percutaneous techniques may be less durable and effective than direct surgical repair.

Cocaine-induced peripheral vascular occlusive disease--a case report.

Two patients with cocaine-induced peripheral vascular occlusive disease are presented. A 37-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for evaluation of severe pain and numbness of his feet. He had used cocaine prior to admission. Arteriography showed bilateral occlusions of superficial femoral, popliteal, and trifucation arteries. Despite repeated infusions of urokinase, he developed progressive bilateral gangrene of both legs necessitating bilateral below-knee amputations. The second patient developed similar symptoms after smoking cocaine. Arteriography showed vasospasm bilaterally from the iliac arteries distally. I.v. nitroglycerin infusion caused resolution of the vasospasm and ischemic symptoms.

Relationship of age, gender, race, and body size to infrarenal aortic diameter. The Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of age, gender, race, and body size on infrarenal aortic diameter (IAD) and to determine expected values for IAD on the basis of these factors. METHODS: Veterans aged 50 to 79 years at 15 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers were invited to undergo ultrasound measurement of IAD and complete a pre-screening questionnaire. We report here on 69,905 subjects who had no previous history of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and no ultrasound evidence of AAA (defined as IAD > or = 3.0 cm). RESULTS: Although age, gender, black race, height, weight, body mass index, and body surface area were associated with IAD by multivariate linear regression (all p < 0.001), the effects were small. Female sex was associated with a 0.14 cm reduction in IAD and black race with a 0.01 cm increase in IAD. A 0.1 cm change in IAD was associated with large changes in the independent variables: 29 years in age, 19 cm or 40 cm in height, 35 kg in weight, 11 kg/m2 in body mass index, and 0.35 m2 in body surface area. Nearly all height-weight groups were within 0.1 cm of the gender means, and the unadjusted gender means differed by only 0.23 cm. The variation among medical centers had more influence on IAD than did the combination of age, gender, race, and body size. CONCLUSIONS: Age, gender, race, and body size have statistically significant but small effects on IAD. Use of these parameters to define AAA may not offer sufficient advantage over simpler definitions (such as an IAD > or = 3.0 cm) to be warranted.

Hospital vs home-based exercise rehabilitation for patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Supervised, hospital-based exercise rehabilitation programs are effective for improving functional status for patients with claudication due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease. However, it has been suggested that unsupervised, home-based exercise programs, which have been relatively little evaluated, would be equally efficacious as compared with hospital-based programs. The authors tested the hypothesis that a hospital-based exercise rehabilitation program would improve treadmill exercise performance more than a home-based program. Of 20 consecutively enrolled patients with claudication, 10 were randomly placed into a supervised, hospital-based program and 10 into an unsupervised, home-based program for a three-month period. Exercise performance was evaluated by treadmill testing using a graded protocol. In addition, functional status was evaluated by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the Medical Outcomes Study SF-20 questionnaire (MOS). Patients in the hospital-based program were treated with treadmill walking three times a week for one hour/visit. Patients in the home-based program were instructed to walk at least three times a week and were contacted weekly to provide encouragement and to record compliance with the program. Patients in the hospital-based group improved peak walking time by 137%, pain-free walking time by 150%, and peak oxygen consumption by 19% (all P < 0.05). Patients reported an improved walking distance and speed according to WIQ data (both P < 0.05). In addition, the MOS physical functioning score in the hospital-based group improved by 20 percentage points (P < 0.05). In contrast, patients in the home-based program did not improve exercise performance measured on the treadmill. Improvement in the ability to walk on the treadmill was greater in the hospital-based than the home-based program (P < 0.05). The ability to walk distances was the only questionnaire measure that improved in persons who received the home-based program (P < 0.05). Preliminary results suggest that a supervised, hospital-based program is more effective for improving treadmill exercise performance than an unsupervised, home-based program.

Unusual causes of mesenteric ischemia.

Although complications of generalized atherosclerosis most commonly cause intestinal ischemia, a number of unusual causes may be responsible. These unusual causes can be grouped into six major categories: (1) mechanical, (2) drugs, (3) hematologic, (4) endocrine, (5) vasculopathies, and (6) miscellaneous. Morbidity and mortality rates remain high because these rare diseases frequently go unrecognized until patients suffer adverse outcomes. A high index of suspicion may decrease the delay in diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia caused by these disorders.

Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Independent risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have not been clearly defined in multivariable analyses of large patient populations. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that are independently associated with AAA and to determine the prevalence of previously unrecognized AAA in defined demographic and risk groups. DESIGN: Cross-sectional screening study. SETTING: 15 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: 73451 veterans who were 50 to 79 years of age and had no history of AAA. MEASUREMENTS: The results of ultrasonographic screening for AAA and a prescreening questionnaire were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: An AAA of 4.0 cm or larger was detected in 1031 participants (1.4%). Smoking was the risk factor most strongly associated with AAA; the odds ratio (OR) for AAAs of 4.0 cm or larger compared with normal aortas (infrarenal aortic diameter < 3.0 cm) was 5.57 (95% CI, 4.24 to 7.31). The association between smoking and AAA increased significantly with the number of years of smoking and decreased significantly with the number of years after quitting smoking. The excess prevalence associated with smoking accounted for 78% of all AAAs that were 4.0 cm or larger in the study sample. Female sex (OR, 0.22 [CI, 0.07 to 0.68]), black race (OR, 0.49 [CI, 0.35 to 0.69]), and presence of diabetes (OR, 0.54 [CI, 0.44 to 0.65]) were negatively associated with AAA. A family history of AAA was positively associated with AAA (OR, 1.95 [CI, 1.56 to 2.43]) but was reported by only 5.1% of participants. Other independently associated factors included age, height, coronary artery disease, any atherosclerosis, high cholesterol levels, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with multiple factors. Smoking was the risk factor most strongly associated with AAA and may be responsible for most clinically important cases of previously undiagnosed AAA.

Carotid artery disease in women.

Our understanding of cerebrovascular disease in women is hampered by a paucity of studies that include adequate numbers of female patients. Most studies are heavily biased toward men. Although women have fewer strokes than men and have a better long-term prognosis after strokes or TIAs, cerebrovascular disease still affects large numbers of women. Presently, there is little convincing evidence that standard medical therapy with aspirin for prevention of strokes in women is of benefit. Perhaps, inclusion of insufficient numbers of women in the aspirin trials for symptomatic carotid stenoses explains the apparent lack of therapeutic efficacy. Although ticlopidine does not appear particularly promising for prevention of stroke, other novel antiplatelet and antithrombotic agents are being developed and need to be tested in women. Carotid endarterectomy prevents strokes in women and men, but women enjoy a lesser benefit; this appears to be true both for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenoses. Whereas restenosis is more common in women than men, most lesions remain asymptomatic. Surgery will probably remain the mainstay of treatment for cerebrovascular disease in women and men, but in this era of "gender correctness," the striking absence of reliable data exclusively applicable to women confirms the need for additional studies.

Preoperative cardiac risk management.

CAD is present in most patients with peripheral arterial disease and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality after vascular operations. Clinical risk assessment attempts to identify those patients at low, intermediate, or high cardiac risk for adverse cardiac outcomes. Additional tests add little information to the estimates obtained by clinical scoring in patients at low risk. Patients with high cardiac risk scores are clearly at increased risk of experiencing postoperative complications, but further investigations are needed only if knowledge of the functional severity or degree of myocardial ischemia will alter subsequent management. In general, high-risk patients should proceed to coronary angiography, intensive perioperative monitoring, alteration in the planned operation, or avoidance of surgery altogether if indications are less than compelling. Those patients identified as intermediate risk by clinical scoring benefit most from additional tests. In these patients special studies or even coronary arteriography may be useful if the vascular surgery can be delayed until myocardial revascularization is completed. Practically, preoperative cardiac work-up must also consider the indication for surgery. Patients who have threatened limbs or ruptured aneurysms or are severely symptomatic cannot afford the time involved for obtaining additional tests. Moreover, the question of what to do with the information provided by special studies is problematic in these patients. For example, if significant symptomatic or asymptomatic CAD is present in a patient with a gangrenous foot, what is gained by the delay in lower extremity revascularization required when prophylactic CABG is performed? Reports supporting prophylactic CAD intervention are nonrandomized and uncontrolled. CABG and PTCA should be performed only on the merits of the patient's cardiac symptoms and coronary artery anatomy, not to enhance safety of the proposed vascular procedure, because advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques and intraoperative and postoperative monitoring have resulted in lower morbidity and mortality of elective vascular surgery.