Decreased susceptibility to fatty acid-induced peripheral tissue insulin resistance in women.

Elevation of plasma nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels has been shown in various studies to induce peripheral tissue insulin resistance and impair the suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP). These studies have been conducted predominantly in men. We compared the effects of elevated plasma NEFA levels on basal and insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism in 8 normal women (age 42 +/- 8 years [mean +/- SD], BMI 25 +/- 3 kg/m(2)) and 10 normal men (35 +/- 6 years, 24 +/- 3 kg/m(2)). Each subject underwent two 5-h 80 mU. m(-2). min(-1) hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps with measurement of glucose kinetics (intravenous [3-(3)H]glucose) and substrate oxidation. Plasma NEFA levels were elevated in one study for 3 h before and during the clamp ( approximately 1 mmol/l in both groups) by infusion of 20% Intralipid (60 ml/h) and heparin (900 U/h). In the control studies, the men and women had similar insulin-stimulated glucose disposal rates (R(d)) and substrate oxidation rates. In the men, elevated NEFA levels decreased insulin-stimulated glucose R(d) during the final 40 min of the clamp by 23% (P < 0.001). By contrast, no significant change in glucose R(d) was found in the women (control 10.4 +/- 1.1, lipid study 9.9 +/- 1.3 mg. kg(-1). min(-1)). Glucose R(d) was also unchanged in six women studied at a lower insulin dose (40 mU. m(-2). min(-1)). During the last 40 min of the high-insulin dose clamps with elevated NEFA, glucose oxidation was decreased by 33% in the men (P < 0.001) and by 23% in the women (P < 0.02). Nonoxidative glucose R(d) at this time was decreased by 15% in the men (P = 0.02) but was not significantly affected in women. Basal EGP was unaffected by elevation of plasma NEFA levels in both groups. Suppression of EGP during the glucose clamps, however, was impaired. At the insulin infusion rate used, the magnitude of this defect was comparable in men and women. In summary, our findings suggest that although the effects on EGP appear comparable, the inhibitory effects of NEFA on peripheral tissue insulin sensitivity are observed in men but cannot be demonstrated in women.

Metabolic effects of troglitazone therapy in type 2 diabetic, obese, and lean normal subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize metabolic effects of troglitazone in type 2 diabetic, obese, and lean subjects, and examine the effects of troglitazone 2-3 weeks after discontinuation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Nine type 2 diabetic, nine obese, and nine lean subjects underwent baseline metabolic studies including an 8-h meal-tolerance test (MTT) and a 5-h glucose clamp. Subjects then received troglitazone (600 mg/day) for 12 weeks and subsequently had repeat metabolic studies. Diabetic subjects remained off hypoglycemic agents for 2-3 weeks and then underwent a 5-h glucose clamp. RESULTS: In diabetic subjects, fasting plasma glucose was reduced (P<0.05) and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (Rd) was enhanced by treatment (P<0.02). The area under the MTT 8-h plasma glucose curve declined with therapy (P<0.001), and its change was positively correlated with the improvement in Rd (r = 0.75, P<0.05). There was also a positive correlation between the change in fasting hepatic glucose output (HGO) and the change in fasting plasma glucose with treatment (r = 0.92, P<0.001). Discontinuation of therapy for 2-3 weeks did not significantly affect fasting plasma glucose or insulin-stimulated glucose Rd. In obese subjects, insulin-stimulated glucose Rd improved with therapy (P<0.001), allowing for maintenance of euglycemia by lower plasma insulin concentrations (P<0.05). In lean subjects, an increase in fasting HGO (P<0.001) and glucose clearance (P<0.01) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Troglitazone lowers fasting and postprandial plasma glucose in type 2 diabetes by affecting both fasting HGO and peripheral insulin sensitivity. Its effects are evident 2-3 weeks after discontinuation. In obese subjects, its insulin sensitizing effects suggest a role for its use in the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes.

Effects of troglitazone on blood concentrations of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 in patients with type 2 diabetes and in lean and obese normal subjects.

Low plasma fibrinolytic activity in association with increased plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) levels has been linked to an increased risk of atherosclerosis in obesity and type 2 diabetes. We tested the hypothesis that troglitazone, which improves insulin sensitivity and lowers plasma insulin levels in insulin-resistant obese subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes, would also lower circulating PAI-1 antigen concentrations and activity. We assessed insulin sensitivity (5-h, 80 mU x m(-2) x min(-1) hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp) and measured plasma PAI-1 antigen and activities and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in 14 patients with type 2 diabetes and 20 normal control subjects (10 lean, 10 obese) before and after 3 months of treatment with troglitazone (600 mg/day). At baseline, plasma PAI-1 antigen levels after an overnight fast were significantly higher in the obese (33.5 +/- 4.7 microg/l) and type 2 diabetic subjects (54.9 +/- 6.3 microg/l) than in the lean control subjects (16.3 +/- 3.2 microg/l; P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Troglitazone decreased plasma PAI-1 antigen concentrations in the diabetic patients (36.8 +/- 5.0 microg/l; P < 0.001 vs. baseline), but the reduction in the obese subjects did not reach statistical significance (baseline, 33.5 +/- 4.7; after troglitazone, 25.6 +/- 5.2 microg/l). Changes in plasma PAI-1 activity paralleled those of PAI-1 antigen. The extent of the reduction in plasma PAI-1 antigen concentrations in the diabetic patients after troglitazone correlated with the reductions in fasting plasma insulin (r = 0.60, P < 0.05), nonesterified fatty acid (r = 0.63, P < 0.02), and glucose concentrations (r = 0.64, P < 0.02) but not with the improvement in glucose disposal rates during the glucose clamps. Three nonresponders to troglitazone with respect to effects on insulin sensitivity and fasting glucose and insulin levels also had no reduction in circulating PAI-1. In conclusion, troglitazone enhances fibrinolytic system activity in insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic patients. This effect appears to be intimately linked to its potential to lower plasma insulin levels and improve glycemic control through its peripheral tissue insulin-sensitizing effects.

Lack of effect of a physiological elevation of plasma non-esterified fatty acid levels on insulin secretion.

Elevated plasma non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels in obese subjects may contribute to their higher insulin secretory rates by direct effects on the islet B-cells. This may involve short-term metabolic effects, or long-term effects on islet B-cell mass, which is characteristically increased in obesity. We examined the effects of elevating plasma NEFA levels for 5.5 to 7 h on insulin secretion after an overnight fast and during a 90 min 12 mmol/l hyperglycemic clamp in 9 normal women (40.1 +/- 9.5 years [mean +/- SD]; BMI: 25.2 +/- 3.72 kg/m(2) ). Subjects were studied twice. In one study plasma NEFA levels were increased approximately 2-fold by infusion of 20% Intralipid (60 ml/h) and heparin (900 U/h) for 5.5 h before and throughout the glucose clamp. Elevated NEFA levels were associated with a small increase in fasting plasma glucose (5.0 +/- 0.1 vs 4.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, P <0.05) and C-peptide levels (0.54 +/- 0.09 vs 0.41 +/- 0.06 nmol/l, P <0.05). The increase in fasting insulin levels did not, however, reach statistical significance (9.0 +/- 2.5 vs 5.3 +/- 1.4 mU/l, NS). During the glucose clamp, plasma NEFA levels were suppressed to very low levels in the saline control study. Although plasma NEFA levels also fell in the lipid/heparin study, they remained significantly higher than on the control day, and somewhat higher than might be expected postprandially in obese subjects. During the glucose clamps, plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles were similar on the two study days. No difference in either first or second phase insulin secretion was observed between the two studies. In conclusion, our findings do not support the idea that the exaggerated insulin secretion in obesity is mediated by short-term effects of plasma NEFA levels on islet B-cell metabolism, independent of plasma glucose levels.

A comparison of troglitazone and metformin on insulin requirements in euglycemic intensively insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients.

Troglitazone and metformin lower glucose levels in diabetic patients without increasing plasma insulin levels. We compared the insulin sparing actions of these two agents and their effects on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in 20 type 2 diabetic patients. To avoid the confounding effect of improved glycemic control on insulin action and secretion, patients were first rendered euglycemic with 4 weeks of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) before randomization to CSII plus troglitazone (n = 10) or CSII plus metformin (n = 10); euglycemia was maintained for another 6-7 weeks. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp 1) at baseline, 2) after 4 weeks of CSII, and 3) after CSII plus either troglitazone or metformin. The 24-h glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles were performed on the day before the second and third glucose clamps. Good glycemic control was achieved with CSII alone and was maintained with CSII plus an oral agent (mean 24-h glucose: troglitazone, 6.2+/-0.6 mmol/l; metformin, 6.2 +/-0.3 mmol/l). Insulin requirements decreased 53% with troglitazone compared with CSII alone (48+/-4 vs. 102+/-13 U/day, P < 0.001), but only 31% with metformin (76+/-13 vs. 110+/-18 U/day, P < 0.005). The 24-h C-peptide profiles were similar. Normal fasting hepatic glucose output was maintained with both agents despite lower insulin levels than on CSII alone. Insulin sensitivity did not change significantly with CSII alone or with CSII plus metformin, but improved 29% with CSII plus troglitazone (P < 0.005 vs. CSII alone) and was then 45% higher than in the CSII plus metformin patients (P < 0.005). In conclusion, metformin has no effect on insulin-stimulated glucose disposal independent of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Troglitazone (600 mg/day) has greater insulin-sparing effects than metformin (1,700 mg/day) in CSII-treated euglycemic patients. This is probably explained by the peripheral tissue insulin-sensitizing effects of troglitazone.

Regulation of skeletal muscle hexokinase II by insulin in nondiabetic and NIDDM subjects.

Impaired muscle glucose phosphorylation to glucose-6-phosphate by hexokinases (HKs)-I and -II may contribute to insulin resistance in NIDDM and obesity. HK-II expression is regulated by insulin. We tested the hypothesis that basal and insulin-stimulated expression of HK-II is decreased in NIDDM and obese subjects. Skeletal muscle HK-I and HK-II activities were measured in seven lean and six obese normal subjects and eight patients with NIDDM before and at 3 and 5 h of a hyperinsulinemic (80 mU x m(-2) x min(-1)) euglycemic clamp. To assess whether changes in HK-II expression seen during a glucose clamp are likely to be physiologically relevant, we also measured HK-I and HK-II activity in 10 lean normal subjects before and after a high-carbohydrate meal. After an overnight fast, total HK, HK-I, and HK-II activities were similar in lean and obese control subjects; but HK-II was lower in NIDDM patients than in lean subjects (1.42 +/- 0.16 [SE] vs. 2.33 +/- 0.24 nmol x min(-1) x mg(-1) molecular weight, P < 0.05) and accounted for a lower proportion of total HK (33 +/- 3 vs. 47 +/- 3%, P < 0.025). HK-II (but not HK-I) activity increased during the clamp in lean and obese subjects by 34 and 36% after 3 h and by 14 and 22% after 5 h of hyperinsulinemia; no increase was found in the NIDDM patients. In the lean subjects, muscle HK-II activity also increased by 15% 4 h after the meal, from 2.47 +/- 0.19 basally to 2.86 +/- 0.28 nmol x min(-1) x mg(-1) protein (P < 0.05). During the clamps, muscle HK-II activity correlated with muscle citrate synthase activity in the normal subjects (r = 0.58, P < 0.05) but not in the NIDDM patients. A weak relationship was noted between muscle HK-II activity and glucose disposal rate at the end of the clamp when all three groups were combined (r = 0.49, P < 0.05). In summary, NIDDM patients have lower muscle HK-II activity basally and do not increase the activity of this enzyme in response to a 5-h insulin stimulus. This defect may contribute to their insulin resistance. In nondiabetic obese subjects, muscle HK-II expression and its regulation by insulin are normal.

Insulin secretory capacity and the regulation of glucagon secretion in diabetic and non-diabetic alcoholic cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Insulin secretion is increased in cirrhotic patients without diabetes but decreased in cirrhotic patients with diabetes. Increased glucagon secretion is found in both groups. Our aim was to determine: 1) whether alterations in insulin secretion are due to changes in maximal secretory capacity or altered islet B-cell sensitivity to glucose, and 2) whether regulation of glucagon secretion by glucose is disturbed. METHODS: Insulin, C-peptide and glucagon levels were measured basally and during 12, 19 and 28 mmol/l glucose clamps, and in response to 5 g intravenous arginine basally and after 35 min at a glucose of 12, 19 and 28 mmol/l in 6 non-diabetic alcoholic cirrhotic patients, six diabetic alcoholic cirrhotic patients and six normal controls. RESULTS: Fasting insulin, and C-peptide levels were higher in cirrhotic patients than controls but not different between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. C-peptide levels at t=35 min of the clamp increased more with glucose concentration in non-diabetic cirrhotic patients than controls; there was little increase in diabetic cirrhotic patients. At a blood glucose of approximately 5 mmol/l the 2-5 min C-peptide response to arginine (CP[ARG]) was similar in all groups, but enhancement of this response by glucose was greater in non-diabetic cirrhotic patients and impaired in diabetic cirrhotic patients. Maximal insulin secretion (CP(ARG) at 28 mmol/l glucose) was 49% higher in the non-diabetic cirrhotic patients than controls (p<0.05); in diabetic cirrhotic patients it was 47% lower (p<0.05). The glucose level required for half-maximal potentiation of (CPARG) was not different in the three groups. Cirrhotic patients had higher fasting glucagon levels, and a greater 2-5-min glucagon response to arginine, which was enhanced by concomitant diabetes (p<0.001 vs controls). Suppression of plasma glucagon by hyperglycaemia was markedly impaired in diabetic cirrhotic patients (glucagon levels at 35 min of 28 mmol/l glucose clamp: diabetics, 139 x/divided by 1.25 ng/l, non-diabetic cirrhotic patients, 24 x/divided by 1.20, controls, 21 x/divided by 1.15, p<0.001). Suppression of arginine-stimulated glucagon secretion by glucose was also impaired in diabetic cirrhotic patients, and to a lesser extent in non-diabetic cirrhotic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin secretory abnormalities in diabetic and non-diabetic cirrhotic patients are due to changes in maximal secretory capacity rather than altered B-cell sensitivity to glucose. The exaggerated glucagon response to arginine in alcoholic cirrhotic patients is not abolished by hyperglycaemia/hyperinsulinaemia. In diabetic alcoholic cirrhotic patients, the inhibitory effect of glucose on basal glucagon secretion is also markedly impaired.

Skeletal muscle peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor-gamma expression in obesity and non- insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

UNLABELLED: The two isoforms of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma1 and PPARgamma2), are ligand-activated transcription factors that are the intracellular targets of a new class of insulin sensitizing agents, the thiazolidinediones. The observation that thiazolidinediones enhance skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity in obesity and in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), by activating PPARgamma, and possibly by inducing its expression, suggests that PPARgamma expression in skeletal muscle plays a key role in determining tissue sensitivity to insulin, and that PPARgamma expression may be decreased in insulin resistant subjects. We used a sensitive ribonuclease protection assay, that permits simultaneous measurement of the two isoforms, to examine the effects of obesity and NIDDM, and the effects of insulin, on skeletal muscle levels of PPARgamma1 and PPARgamma2 mRNA. We studied seven patients with NIDDM (body mass index, 32+/-1 kg/m2), seven lean (24+/-1 kg/m2), and six obese (36+/-1 kg/m2) normal subjects. Biopsies from the vastus lateralis muscle were taken before and after a 5-h hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m2 per minute) euglycemic clamp. The obese controls and NIDDM patients were insulin resistant with glucose disposal rates during the last 30 min of the clamp that were 67 and 31%, respectively, of those found in the lean controls. PPARgamma1, but not PPARgamma2 mRNA was detected in skeletal muscle at 10-15% of the level found in adipose tissue. No difference was found in PPARgamma1 levels between the three groups, and there was no change in PPARgamma1 levels after 5 h of hyperinsulinemia. In obese subjects, PPARgamma1 correlated with clamp glucose disposal rates (r = 0.92, P < 0.01). In the lean and NIDDM patients, muscle PPARgamma1 levels correlated with percentage body fat (r = 0.76 and r = 0.82, respectively, both P < 0.05) but not with body mass index. IN CONCLUSION: (a) skeletal muscle PPARgamma1 expression does not differ between normal and diabetic subjects, and is not induced by short-term hyperinsulinemia; (b) skeletal muscle PPARgamma1 expression was higher in subjects whose percent body fat exceeded 25%, and this may be a compensatory phenomenon in an attempt to maintain normal insulin sensitivity.

Effects of nonesterified fatty acids on glucose metabolism after glucose ingestion.

Impaired suppression of plasma nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) after glucose ingestion may contribute to glucose intolerance, but the mechanisms are unclear. Evidence that insulin inhibits hepatic glucose output (HGO), in part by suppressing plasma NEFA levels, suggests that impaired suppression of plasma NEFA after glucose ingestion would impair HGO suppression and increase the systemic delivery of glucose. To test this hypothesis, we studied glucose kinetics (constant intravenous [3-3H]glucose [0.4 microCi/min], oral [1-14C]glucose [100 microCi]), whole-body substrate oxidation, and leg glucose uptake in eight normal subjects (age, 39 +/- 9 years [mean +/- SD]; BMI, 24 +/- 2 kg/m2) in response to 75 g oral glucose on two occasions. In one study, plasma NEFAs were prevented from falling by infusion of 20% Liposyn (45 ml/h) and heparin (750 U/h). Plasma glucose rose more rapidly during lipid infusion (P < 0.05), and mean levels tended to be higher after 120 min (6.45 +/- 0.41 vs. 5.81 +/- 0.25 SE, 0.1 < P < 0.05, NS); peak glucose levels were similar. Total glucose appearance (Ra) was higher during lipid infusion due to a higher HGO (28.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 21.2 +/- 1.5 g over 4 h, P < 0.005). Total glucose disposal (Rd) was also higher (88 +/- 2 vs. 81 +/- 3 g in 4 h, P < 0.05). Plasma insulin rose more rapidly after glucose ingestion with lipid infusion, and leg glucose uptake was 33% higher (P < 0.05) during the 1st hour. During lipid infusion, subjects oxidized less glucose (47 +/- 3 vs. 55 +/- 2 g, P < 0.05) and more fat (7.1 +/- 0.8 vs. 3.9 +/- 0.9 g, P < 0.02). In summary, 1) impaired suppression of NEFAs after oral glucose impairs insulin's ability to suppress HGO, and 2) in normal subjects the greater insulin response compensates for the increased systemic glucose delivery by increasing peripheral glucose Rd.

Acute effects of central neuropeptide Y injection on glucose metabolism in fasted rats.

1. Neuropeptide Y is a potent appetite stimulant and has been found to modulate glucose metabolism when given chronically. The acute effects of neuropeptide on peripheral glucose handling have not been studied in detail. We have studied the acute effects of central nervous system injection of neuropeptide on glucose metabolism in vivo in the rat. 2. Rats implanted with chronic cannulae in the third cerebral ventricle were injected with either neuropeptide Y or saline and peripheral insulin sensitivity was assessed during a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. The effect of centrally injected neuropeptide Y on post-absorptive glucose metabolism was studied using a constant infusion of [6-3H]glucose. 3. Infusion of neuropeptide Y resulted in a 18% increase in glucose requirement during the clamp, suggesting increased peripheral tissue responsiveness to insulin. Neuropeptide Y injection in 10h fasted rats increased plasma glucose (area under curve 9.9 +/- 0.2 versus 9.1 +/- 0.1 mmol h-1l-1, P < 0.01), insulin (103 +/- 23 versus 33 +/- 8 pmol/l, P < 0.01, at 30 min) and glucagon (5.5 +/- 0.5 versus 3.1 +/- 0.3 pmol/l, P < 0.05, at 30 min). The increase in plasma glucose was due to an initial increase in the rate of appearance, which peaked between 20 and 30 min after neuropeptide Y infusion; over the entire 90 min 16% more glucose entered the systemic circulation in the neuropeptide Y-treated rats than in control rats, and the total quantity of glucose removed was also greater. 4. Neuropeptide Y in the central nervous system influences glucose metabolism by altering secretion of islet hormones, hepatic glucose production and the peripheral response to insulin.

Insulin secretion and plasma levels of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide 1 [7-36 amide] after oral glucose in cirrhosis.

A blunted initial insulin secretory response may contribute to oral glucose intolerance in cirrhosis. Oral glucose is a better stimulant to insulin secretion than intravenous (IV) glucose in part because of release of gut peptides, notably glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 [7-36 amide] (GLP-1 [7-36 amide]). Because impaired release of or resistance to these gut peptides could explain impaired insulin secretion after oral glucose, we measured insulin secretion, plasma GIP, and GLP-1 [7-36 amide] levels, basally and after 75 g oral glucose, in 10 cirrhotics and 10 controls. Insulin secretion was calculated from a two-compartment analysis of serum C-peptide levels using kinetic parameters derived from IV injection of recombinant human C-peptide. C-peptide metabolic clearance rate, and the fractional rate constants for C-peptide (using the two-compartment model) were not significantly different, but the volume of the central compartment was 15% greater in cirrhotics (P < .01). Fasting blood glucose levels were similar (cirrhotics, 4.9 +/- 0.2; controls, 4.6 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) but serum insulin was six times higher in cirrhotics (P < .001). Cirrhotics had higher fasting GIP (215 +/- 72 vs. 42 +/- 18 pmol/L) and GLP-1 [7-36 amide] levels (25 +/- 3 vs. 16 +/- 1 pmol/L) (both P < .05). After oral glucose, blood glucose levels were significantly higher in cirrhotics. The timing of the gut peptide response to oral glucose was similar in the two groups, but peak levels of both peptides were approximately x2 higher in the cirrhotics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The contribution of proinsulin and des-31,32 proinsulin to the hyperinsulinemia of diabetic and nondiabetic cirrhotic patients.

We used specific, monoclonal antibody-based, two-site immunoradiometric assays to test the hypothesis that serum levels of proinsulin and des-31,32 proinsulin would be increased in cirrhosis, particularly in those with overt diabetes. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was performed after an overnight fast in eight cirrhotic patients with diabetes (fasting blood glucose, 7.8 +/- 2.2 [SE] mmol/L), seven nondiabetic cirrhotic patients, and eight normal control subjects. Fasting serum immunoreactive insulin levels were approximately six times higher in cirrhotics than in controls, but were not different between diabetic and nondiabetic cirrhotic patients. After oral glucose, the incremental area under the serum insulin concentration curve was 3,475 +/- 1,009 pmol.L-1.h in nondiabetic cirrhotic patients, significantly higher than in controls (761 +/- 48, P < .001) or diabetic cirrhotic patients (881 +/- 186, P < .05). Fasting serum proinsulin levels in diabetic cirrhotic patients (24.0 +/- 5.7 pmol/L) were higher than in controls (2.3 +/- .05, P < .001) or nondiabetic cirrhotic patients (4.4 +/- 0.8, P < .005). Fasting serum levels of des-31,32 proinsulin were also much higher in diabetic cirrhotic patients than in nondiabetic cirrhotic patients or controls (P < .02 and P < .005, respectively). Fasting proinsulin plus des-31,32 proinsulin constituted 12.5% +/- 1.4% of serum immunoreactive insulin in diabetic cirrhotics, higher than in nondiabetic cirrhotics (3.7% +/- 0.5%, P < .001) and normal controls (7.8% +/- 1.5%, P = .035).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lipid metabolism and substrate oxidation during intravenous fructose administration in cirrhosis.

We used isotope dilution techniques (constant intravenous [IV] infusion of 2-3H-glycerol and 1-14C-palmitate) and indirect calorimetry to measure lipid kinetics and substrate oxidation rates during IV fructose administration at 200 and then 500 mg/kg/h in eight cirrhotic patients and seven normal control subjects. Fasting plasma glucose, glycerol, and glycerol appearance rate (Ra) were similar in both groups, but insulin levels were fourfold higher in cirrhotics (P < .01). Fasting serum nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels (cirrhotics, 869 +/- 124, controls, 717 +/- 90 mumol/L) and NEFA Ra (7.1 +/- 0.8 v 5.5 +/- 0.9 mumol/min/kg) were higher in cirrhotics, but the differences were not significant. Plasma fructose was similar in both groups at both fructose infusion rates. Fructose appeared to stimulate insulin secretion. With i.v. fructose, serum NEFA levels decreased, reaching similar low levels when 500 mg/kg/h was infused, due to a reduction in NEFA Ra and an increase in the NEFA metabolic clearance rate (MCR). Glycerol levels showed little change. As glycerol Ra decreased by less than 20% in both groups, the decrease in serum NEFA was primarily due to enhanced reesterification of fatty acids both within adipose tissue (preventing their release) and in other tissues (enhancing their removal from plasma). Although total fructose utilization was normal in cirrhotics, they oxidized more of the infused fructose; nonoxidative disposal was reduced (first step, 242 +/- 12 v 318 +/- 16 mg/kg in 2 hours, P < .002; second step, 657 +/- 32 v 786 +/- 21 mg/kg in 2 hours, P < .005). Although tissue fructose uptake is insulin-independent, insulin resistance in cirrhosis may influence the intracellular metabolism of fructose.

Lipid metabolism and insulin resistance in cirrhosis.

Fasting patients with cirrhosis have high plasma non-esterified fatty acids, and a high turnover and oxidation of non-esterified fatty acids, despite high plasma insulin levels. To assess whether increased non-esterified fatty acid availability impairs utilisation of circulating glucose, and contributes to the insulin insensitivity in cirrhosis, we measured glucose, non-esterified fatty acid and glycerol flux rates, in patients with cirrhosis and controls, in the basal state and during a 0.05 U.kg-1.h-1 hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. After an overnight fast, basal blood glucose and glucose turnover were similar in both groups. Basal plasma glycerol and non-esterified fatty acid levels were higher in patients with cirrhosis as were 1-14C-nonesterified fatty acid turnover (4.48 +/- 0.53 vs 2.54 +/- 0.45 mumol.kg-1.min-1, p < 0.05) and 2H5-glycerol turnover (3.27 +/- 0.34 vs 2.24 +/- 0.15 mumol.kg-1.min-1, p < 0.05), indicating increased lipolysis in patients with cirrhosis; metabolic clearance rate of non-esterified fatty acids and glycerol were similar in both groups, suggesting no impairment of tissue uptake in patients. The euglycaemic clamp showed patients with cirrhosis to be markedly insensitive to insulin. The glucose metabolic clearance rate increased during the clamp in controls (p < 0.005) but not in patients with cirrhosis, indicating that infused insulin had little or no effect on glucose disposal in the patients. Clamp glucose turnover in controls was higher than in the basal state (p < 0.001); in patients with cirrhosis it was lower. The profound insulin insensitivity and the clamping of blood glucose below fasting levels explains the fall in glucose turnover in patients with cirrhosis during the clamp. In both groups serum non-esterified fatty acid and glycerol levels, and their appearance rates, were suppressed during the clamp, but levels remained significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis (non-esterified fatty acids, 0.20 +/- 0.4 vs 0.10 +/- 0.01 mmol/l, p < 0.05; glycerol 74 +/- 9 vs 46 +/- 4 mumol/l, p < 0.05). This, with the high basal non-esterified fatty acid and glycerol levels seen in patients with cirrhosis, despite high insulin levels, suggests resistance of adipose tissue lipolysis to insulin. There was no correlation between glucose infusion requirements and non-esterified fatty acid turnover. The normal turnover of blood glucose in fasting patients with cirrhosis, despite increased non-esterified fatty acid turnover, suggests utilisation mainly by tissues with an obligatory requirement for glucose, which may be similar in patients with cirrhosis and controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Energy expenditure and substrate metabolism after oral fructose in patients with cirrhosis.

There is little information on the metabolic response to ingested fructose in patients with cirrhosis. Glucose kinetics, plasma lipid and blood lactate levels, whole body substrate oxidation rates and energy expenditure were measured following ingestion of 75 g fructose, in 8 cirrhotic patients and 6 controls. Fasting plasma glucose levels and rates of glucose appearance (Ra) and disappearance (Rd) were similar. The basal rate of lipolysis was higher in cirrhotic patients (P < 0.05), but whole body lipid and carbohydrate oxidation rates and energy expenditure were similar. After fructose ingestion, plasma fructose levels were much higher in cirrhotic patients (P < 0.001) and the incremental area under the plasma glucose curve was twice that of controls (P < 0.05). The increase in glucose in patients with cirrhosis was due to an increase in glucose Ra and an initial reduction in glucose Rd. Plasma non-esterified fatty acid levels fell to similar low levels in both groups. Glycerol levels fell in controls (P < 0.05) but not in cirrhotic patients. Blood lactate levels, fasting and after oral fructose, were similar in cirrhotics and controls. The time course of suppression of lipid oxidation and stimulation of carbohydrate oxidation was more closely related to fructose levels than to serum fatty acid levels in both groups. The percent suppression and total quantity of lipid oxidized in 4 h after fructose were not significantly different, but the suppressed lipid oxidation rates and elevated carbohydrate oxidation rates were sustained for longer in the cirrhotics. The data suggest that fructose uptake and metabolism inhibits oxidation of intracellular lipid. There was a smaller increase in energy expenditure after fructose in cirrhotics (P < 0.001), but normal overall storage of fructose; the likely explanation is reduced first pass hepatic fructose uptake in cirrhotics making more fructose available to the periphery for incorporation into muscle glycogen. The energy cost of storing fructose as muscle glycogen is less than that of storing it as liver glycogen. Preferential incorporation of fructose carbon into muscle glycogen, with lower rates of hepatic glycogen and triglyceride synthesis, would therefore result in less energy expenditure after a fructose load in cirrhotics.

Metabolic handling of orally administered glucose in cirrhosis.

We used a dual-isotope method (oral [1-14C]glucose and intravenous [6-3H]glucose) to examine whether the oral glucose intolerance of cirrhosis is due to (a) a greater input of glucose into the systemic circulation (owing to a lower first-pass hepatic uptake of ingested glucose, or to impaired inhibition of hepatic glucose output), (b) a lower rate of glucose removal, or (c) a combination of these mechanisms. Indirect calorimetry was used to measure oxidative and nonoxidative metabolism. Basal plasma glucose levels (cirrhotics, 5.6 +/- 0.4[SE], controls, 5.1 +/- 0.2 mmol/liter), and rates of glucose appearance (Ra) and disappearance (Rd) were similar in the two groups. After 75 g of oral glucose, plasma glucose levels were higher in cirrhotics than controls, the curves diverging for 80 min despite markedly higher insulin levels in cirrhotics. During the first 20 min, there was very little change in glucose Rd and the greater initial increase in plasma glucose in cirrhotics resulted from a higher Ra of ingested [1-14C]glucose into the systemic circulation, suggesting a reduced first-pass hepatic uptake of portal venous glucose. The continuing divergence of the plasma glucose curves was due to a lower glucose Rd between 30 and 80 min (cirrhotics 236 +/- 17 mg/kg in 50 min, controls 280 +/- 17 mg/kg in 50 min, P < 0.05, one-tailed test). Glucose metabolic clearance rate rose more slowly in cirrhotics and was significantly lower than in controls during the first 2 h after glucose ingestion (2.24 +/- 0.17 vs 3.30 +/- 0.23 ml/kg per min, P < 0.005), in keeping with their known insulin insensitivity. Despite the higher initial glucose Ra in cirrhotics, during the entire 4-h period the quantity of total glucose and of ingested glucose (cirrhotics 54 +/- 2 g [72% of oral load], controls 54 +/- 3 g) appearing in the systemic circulation were similar. Overall glucose Rd (cirrhotics 72.5 +/- 3.8 g/4 h, controls 77.2 +/- 2.2 g/4h) and percent suppression of hepatic glucose output over 4 h (cirrhotics, 53 +/- 10%, controls 49 +/- 8%) were also similar. After glucose ingestion much of the extra glucose utilized was oxidized to provide energy that in the basal state was derived from lipid fuels. Glucose oxidation after glucose ingestion was similar in both groups and accounted for approximately two-thirds of glucose Rd. The reduction in overall nonoxidative glucose disposal did not reach significance (21 +/- 5 vs. 29 +/- 3 g/4 h, 0.05 < P < 0.1). Although our data would be compatible with an impairment of tissue glycogen deposition after oral glucose, glucose storage as glycogen probably plays a small part part in overall glucose disposal. Our results suggest that the higher glucose levels seen in cirrhotics after oral glucose are due initially to an increase in the amount of ingested glucose appearing in the systemic circulation, and subsequently to an impairment in glucose uptake by tissues due to insulin insensitivity. Impaired suppression of hepatic glucose output does not contribute to oral glucose intolerance.

Insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness in diabetic and non-diabetic cirrhotic patients.

In cirrhotic patients with normal fasting glucose levels both insulin insensitivity and a blunted early insulin response to oral glucose are important determinants of the degree of intolerance to oral glucose. It is not known whether the ability of hyperglycaemia per se to enhance glucose disposal (glucose effectiveness) is also impaired. It is also unclear whether overt diabetes is due to: (1) more marked insulin insensitivity; (2) impaired insulin secretion; (3) reduced glucose effectiveness; or (4) a combination of these mechanisms. We used the "minimal model" to analyse the results of a 3-h intravenous glucose tolerance test to assess glucose effectiveness, insulin sensitivity and insulin responses in 12 non-diabetic cirrhotic patients, 8 diabetic cirrhotic patients and 10 normal control subjects. Fasting blood glucose levels were 4.8 +/- 0.2, 7.5 +/- 0.6 and 4.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, respectively. Fasting insulin and C-peptide levels were higher in both cirrhotic patient groups compared with control subjects. The glucose clearance between 6 and 19 min after i.v. glucose was lower in both cirrhotic groups (non-diabetic, 1.56 +/- 0.14, diabetic, 0.76 +/- 0.06, control subjects, 2.49 +/- 0.16 min-1%, both p < 0.001 vs control subjects). Serum insulin peaked at 3 and 23 min in the non-diabetic cirrhotic patients and control subjects; both peaks were higher in the non-diabetic cirrhotic patients and showed a delayed return to basal levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute hyperinsulinemia increases neuropeptide Y concentrations in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus of fasted rats.

Neuropeptide Y, a major hypothalamic peptide, stimulates feeding, insulin secretion and weight gain when injected intrahypothalamically. Hypothalamic NPY may be regulated by insulin availability at hypothalamic level, as its activity is apparently inhibited by intrahypothalamic insulin administration and is stimulated under insulin-deficient conditions. To determine the effects of acute physiological hyperinsulinemia, we measured regional hypothalamic NPY levels in rats during a hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp. Seven male Wistar rats with implanted jugular cannulae, fasted for 24 h, were infused with insulin at 100 mU/h together with variable-rate glucose to maintain euglycemia (3.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l), for 150 min. Controls were infused for the same period with polygeline vehicle alone (n = 8), and had blood glucose concentrations of 4.0 +/- 0.5 mmol/l. Insulin levels were 80.2 +/- 3.9 mU/l in insulin-infused rats and 15.2 +/- 1.4 mU/l in polygeline-treated controls (p < 0.001). NPY levels, measured by radioimmunoassay, were significantly higher in the arcuate nucleus/median eminence (ARC/ME) of hyperinsulinemic rats than in controls (4.8 +/- 1.2 vs 2.5 +/- 0.6 fmol/micrograms protein; p < 0.001), but were comparable with controls in 7 other hypothalamic regions. Acute physiological hyperinsulinemia therefore increases NPY levels selectively in the ARC/ME. Insulin could cause NPY accumulation in the ARC by blocking its transport to NPY-sensitive areas. This would be consistent with the suggestions that insulin inhibits hypothalamic NPY activity and also acts as a central satiety factor.