Recognizing ancient papyri by a combination of spectroscopic, diffractional and chromatographic analytical tools.

Ancient papyri are a written heritage of culture that flourished more than 3000 years ago in Egypt. One of the most significant collections in the world is housed in the Egyptian Museum and Papyrus Collection in Berlin, from where the samples for our investigation come. The papyrologists, curators and conservators of such collections search intensely for the analytical detail that would allow ancient papyri to be distinguished from modern fabrications, in order to detect possible forgeries, assess papyrus deterioration state, and improve the design of storage conditions and conservation methods. This has become the aim of our investigation. The samples were studied by a number of methods, including spectroscopic (FTIR, fluorescent-FS, Raman) diffractional (XRD) and chromatographic (size exclusion chromatography-SEC), selected in order to determine degradation parameters: overall oxidation of lignocellulosic material, degree of polymerization and crystallinity of cellulose. The results were correlated with those obtained from carefully selected model samples including modern papyri and paper of different composition aged at elevated temperature in humid air. The methods were classified in the order SEC > FS > FTIR > XRD, based on their effectiveness in discriminating the state of papyri degradation. However, the most trustworthy evaluation of the age of papyri samples should rely on several methods.

1,4-disubstituted anthracene antitumor agents.

Three different types of 1,4-disubstituted anthracenes were synthesized, and their cytotoxicity in a panel of tumor cells was compared with that of the corresponding 9,10-disubstituted anthracenes. The panel contained human myeloma, melanoma, colon, and lung cancer cells and sensitive and multidrug-resistant murine L1210 leukemia cells. These compounds had [[(dimethylamino)ethyl]amino]methyl, N-[(dimethylamino)ethyl]carbamoyl, and carboxaldehyde (4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)hydrazone side chains. The 1,4-diamide was more potent across the tumor panel than the corresponding 9,10-isomer, but the 1,4-diamine and the 1,4-hydrazone were less potent than their 9,10-isomers. Although the 1,4-hydrazone was active against P388 leukemia in mice, it was inactive against L1210 leukemia. Within each pair of compounds, the one with greater average potency against tumor cells gave a greater increase in the transition melt temperature of DNA.

Inhibitory effect of six green tea catechins and caffeine on the growth of four selected human tumor cell lines.

Green tea is an aqueous infusion of dried unfermented leaves of Camellia sinensis (family Theaceae) from which numerous biological activities have been reported including antimutagenic, antibacterial, hypocholesterolemic, antioxidant, antitumor and cancer preventive activities. From the aqueous-alcoholic extract of green tea leaves, six compounds (+)-gallocatechin (GC), (-)-epicatechin (EC), (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC), (-)-epicatechin gallate (ECG), (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and caffeine, were isolated and purified. Together with (+)-catechin, these compounds were tested against each of four human tumor cells lines (MCF-7 breast carcinoma, HT-29 colon carcinoma, A-427 lung carcinoma and UACC-375 melanoma). The three most potent green tea components against all four tumor cell lines were EGCG, GC and EGC. EGCG was the most potent of the seven green tea components against three out of the four cell lines (i.e. MCF-7 breast cancer, HT-29 colon cancer and UACC-375 melanoma). On the basis of these extensive in vitro studies, it would be of considerable interest to evaluate all three of these components in comparative preclinical in vivo animal tumor model systems before final decisions are made concerning which of these potential chemopreventive drugs should be taken into broad clinical trials.

WR-1065, the active metabolite of amifostine (Ethyol), does not inhibit the cytotoxic effects of a broad range of standard anticancer drugs against human ovarian and breast cancer cells.

Amifostine (WR-2721, Ethyol), a phosphorylated thiol, demonstrates the unique ability to protect normal but not tumour tissue from cytotoxic damage induced by radiation therapy and chemotherapy. This study tested the effect of amifostine's active metabolite, the free thiol, WR-1065, on the cytotoxicity of standard anticancer drugs against human A2780 ovarian and MCF7 breast cancer cell lines in vitro, using the well-characterised sulphorhodamine B assay. 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were determined for each of 16 different anticancer drugs in the presence and absence of the highest nontoxic dose of WR-1065 from concentration-response curves constructed in triplicate and based on 18 replicate cell culture plates for each tested drug concentration. Pretreatment with WR-1065 had no statistically significant effect on the IC50 value of any of the 16 drugs tested against either the A2780 or MCF7 human tumour cells. These data expand upon previous reports showing that amifostine does not protect tumours from the cytotoxic effects of anticancer agents. The ability of amifostine to protect against dose-limiting toxicity to a variety of normal tissues without protection of tumour should enhance the efficacy ratio of a wide range of standard anticancer drugs.

Antineoplastic drugs sulindac sulfide and sulfone inhibit cell growth by inducing apoptosis.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac is known to inhibit chemical carcinogenesis in rodent models and cause regression of adenomas in patients with adenomatous polyposis coli. Sulindac is a prodrug that is metabolized to a pharmacologically active sulfide derivative that potently inhibits prostaglandin synthesis. Recent studies, however, have shown that a sulfone derivative of sulindac, which essentially lacks prostaglandin synthesis inhibitory activity, also inhibits chemical carcinogenesis, suggesting that reduction of prostaglandin levels is not necessary for the antineoplastic activity of this class of drugs. Both sulindac sulfide and the sulfone inhibit the growth of cultured tumor cells, although the cellular mechanism(s) responsible for the antineoplastic activity of sulindac derivatives is unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of sulindac sulfide and sulfone on the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of HT-29 human colon carcinoma cells. Sulindac sulfide and sulfone significantly reduced cell number in both preconfluent and confluent cultures of HT-29 cells with the sulfide showing approximately 4-fold greater potency. In addition to HT-29 cells, both drugs inhibited the growth of a variety of tumor cell lines derived from other tissues, as well as normal epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Neither sulindac sulfide nor sulfone inhibited cell proliferation under conditions where the drugs were growth inhibitory. Only under specific conditions involving mitogenic stimulation did sulindac sulfide and sulfone cause cell cycle arrest. Neither sulindac sulfide nor the sulfone induced differentiation of HT-29 cells, but both drugs strongly induced apoptosis. The apoptotic response to sulindac sulfide and sulfone was both time- and dose-dependent and involved a mechanism independent of their inhibitory effect on cell cycle progression. These data suggest that apoptosis is responsible for the cell growth inhibitory activity of sulindac sulfide and sulfone and represents a potential mechanism for the antineoplastic activity of these drugs.

Antiproliferative effect of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs against human colon cancer cells.

Several lines of evidence suggest that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may be effective in preventing colorectal cancer. These include animal experiments, case-control studies, and clinical experience with sulindac in promoting the regression of adenomatous colon polyps in adenomatous polyposis coli. We determined the antiproliferative activity of various nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, including two sulindac derivatives, against human colon cancer cells in vitro. Ht-29, SW480, and DLD-1 cells were continuously incubated with serial drug dilutions for 6 days prior to fixation. Cell number was determined using the sulforhodamine B assay, and drug concentrations which inhibited cell growth by 50% were estimated for each agent by interpolation. All drugs exhibited antiproliferative activity against Ht-29 and DLD-1 cells, and most inhibited SW480 cells. For Ht-29 cells, the 50% inhibitory concentration varied from 55 microM for diclofenac to 2100 microM for 5-aminosalicylic acid, with three drug groups of high, intermediate, and low potency evident. Inhibition of cell growth by sulindac sulfide was reversible following drug removal. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs exert an antiproliferative effect against human colon cancer cells with a wide range of potencies. A cytostatic response was demonstrated with sulindac sulfide. These data further support the potential role of these agents for chemoprevention of colorectal neoplasia.