Sex differences in sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory variables in childhood asthma: A birth cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are marked sex differences in the prevalence and severity of asthma, both during childhood and adulthood. There is a relative lack of comprehensive studies exploring sex differences in pediatric asthma cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To identify the most relevant sex differences in sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory variables in a well-characterized large pediatric asthma cohort. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Mayo Clinic Olmsted County Birth Cohort. In the full birth cohort, we employed a natural language processing algorithm based on the Predetermined Asthma Criteria for asthma ascertainment. In a stratified random sample of 300 children, we obtained additional pulmonary function tests and laboratory data. We identified the significant sex differences among available sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. RESULTS: Boys were more commonly diagnosed with asthma than girls and were younger at the time of asthma diagnosis. There were no sex differences in relation to socioeconomic status. We identified a male predominance in the presence of a tympanostomy tube and a female predominance in the history of pneumonia. A higher percentage of boys had an FEV1/FVC ratio <0.85. Blood eosinophilia and atopic sensitization were also more common in boys. Finally, boys had higher levels of serum periostin than girls. CONCLUSION: This study describes significant sex differences in a large pediatric asthma cohort. Overall, boys had earlier and more severe asthma than girls. Differences in blood eosinophilia and serum periostin provide insights into possible mechanisms of the sex bias in childhood asthma.

Assessing document section heterogeneity across multiple electronic health record systems for computational phenotyping: A case study of heart-failure phenotyping algorithm.

BACKGROUND: The incorporation of information from clinical narratives is critical for computational phenotyping. The accurate interpretation of clinical terms highly depends on their associated context, especially the corresponding clinical section information. However, the heterogeneity across different Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems poses challenges in utilizing the section information. OBJECTIVES: Leveraging the eMERGE heart failure (HF) phenotyping algorithm, we assessed the heterogeneity quantitatively through the performance comparison of machine learning (ML) classifiers which map clinical sections containing HF-relevant terms across different EHR systems to standard sections in Health Level 7 (HL7) Clinical Document Architecture (CDA). METHODS: We experimented with both random forest models with sentence-embedding features and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers models. We trained MLs using an automated labeled corpus from an EHR system that adopted HL7 CDA standard. We assessed the performance using a blind test set (n = 300) from the same EHR system and a gold standard (n = 900) manually annotated from three other EHR systems. RESULTS: The F-measure of those ML models varied widely (0.00-0.91%), indicating MLs with one tuning parameter set were insufficient to capture sections across different EHR systems. The error analysis indicates that the section does not always comply with the corresponding standardized sections, leading to low performance. CONCLUSIONS: We presented the potential use of ML techniques to map the sections containing HF-relevant terms in multiple EHR systems to standard sections. However, the findings suggested that the quality and heterogeneity of section structure across different EHRs affect applications due to the poor adoption of documentation standards.

A Technical Performance Study and Proposed Systematic and Comprehensive Evaluation of an ML-based CDS Solution for Pediatric Asthma.

Achieving optimal care for pediatric asthma patients depends on giving clinicians efficient access to pertinent patient information. Unfortunately, adherence to guidelines or best practices has shown to be challenging, as relevant information is often scattered throughout the patient record in both structured data and unstructured clinical notes. Furthermore, in the absence of supporting tools, the onus of consolidating this information generally falls upon the clinician. In this study, we propose a machine learning-based clinical decision support (CDS) system focused on pediatric asthma care to alleviate some of this burden. This framework aims to incorporate a machine learning model capable of predicting asthma exacerbation risk into the clinical workflow, emphasizing contextual data, supporting information, and model transparency and explainability. We show that this asthma exacerbation model is capable of predicting exacerbation with an 0.8 AUC-ROC. This model, paired with a comprehensive informatics-based process centered on clinical usability, emphasizes our focus on meeting the needs of the clinical practice with machine learning technology.

Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health in the Era of Artificial Intelligence with Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review.

Background. There is growing evidence that social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDH) play a substantial effect in a wide range of health outcomes. Electronic health records (EHRs) have been widely employed to conduct observational studies in the age of artificial intelligence (AI). However, there has been limited review into how to make the most of SBDH information from EHRs using AI approaches.Methods. A systematic search was conducted in six databases to find relevant peer-reviewed publications that had recently been published. Relevance was determined by screening and evaluating the articles. Based on selected relevant studies, a methodological analysis of AI algorithms leveraging SBDH information in EHR data was provided.Results. Our synthesis was driven by an analysis of SBDH categories, the relationship between SBDH and healthcare-related statuses, natural language processing (NLP) approaches for extracting SBDH from clinical notes, and predictive models using SBDH for health outcomes.Discussion. The associations between SBDH and health outcomes are complicated and diverse; several pathways may be involved. Using NLP technology to support the extraction of SBDH and other clinical ideas simplifies the identification and extraction of essential concepts from clinical data, efficiently unlocks unstructured data, and aids in the resolution of unstructured data-related issues.Conclusion. Despite known associations between SBDH and diseases, SBDH factors are rarely investigated as interventions to improve patient outcomes. Gaining knowledge about SBDH and how SBDH data can be collected from EHRs using NLP approaches and predictive models improves the chances of influencing health policy change for patient wellness, ultimately promoting health and health equity.

Deep Learning Identification of Asthma Inhaler Techniques in Clinical Notes.

There are significant variabilities in clinicians' guideline-concordant documentation in asthma care. However, assessing clinicians' documentation is not feasible using only structured data but requires labor intensive chart review of electronic health records. Although the national asthma guidelines are available it is still challenging to use them as a real-time tool for providing feedback on adhering documentation guidelines for asthma care improvement. A certain guideline element, such as teaching or reviewing inhaler techniques, is difficult to capture by handcrafted rules since it requires contextual understanding of clinical narratives. This study examined a deep learning based natural language model, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) coupled with distant supervision to identify inhaler techniques from clinical narratives. The BERT model with distant supervision outperformed the rule-based approach and achieved performance gain compared with the BERT without distant supervision.