Cost-effectiveness of extended-release injectable naltrexone among incarcerated persons with opioid use disorder before release from prison versus after release.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is highly prevalent among incarcerated populations, and the risk of fatal overdose following release from prison is substantial. Despite efficacy, few correctional facilities provide evidence-based addiction treatment. Extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX) administered prior to release from incarceration may improve health and economic outcomes. METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of XR-NTX before release from prison (n = 38) vs. XR-NTX referral after release (n = 48) of incarcerated participants with OUD, both groups continuing treatment at a community addiction treatment center. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) assessed the cost-effectiveness of XR-NTX before release compared to referral after release for three stakeholder perspectives at 12- and 24-week periods: state policymaker, health care sector, and societal. Effectiveness measures included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and abstinent years from opioids. In addition, we categorized resources as OUD-related and non-OUD-related medical care, state transfer payments, and other societal costs (productivity, criminal justice resources, etc.). RESULTS: Results showed an association between XR-NTX and greater OUD-related costs and total costs from the state policymaker perspective. QALYs gained were positive but statistically insignificant between arms; however, results showed XR-NTX had an estimated 15.5 more days of opioid abstinence over 24 weeks and statistically significant at a 95 % confidence level based on the distribution of bootstrapped samples. We found that estimated ICERs to be > $500,000 per QALY for all stakeholder perspectives. For the abstinent-year effectiveness measure, we found XR-NTX before release to be cost-effective at a 95 % confidence level for willingness-to-pay values >$49,000 per abstinent-year, across all perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: XR-NTX administered to persons who are incarcerated with OUD before release may provide value for stakeholders and bridge a well-known treatment gap for this vulnerable population. Lower than expected participant engagement and missing data limit our results, and study outcomes may be sensitive to methods that address missing data if replicated.

HIV Infection and Depression Among Opiate Users in a US Epicenter of the Opioid Epidemic.

Using a mobile research facility, we enrolled 141 opioid users from a neighborhood of Philadelphia, an urban epicenter of the opioid epidemic. Nearly all (95.6%) met DSM-5 criteria for severe opioid use disorder. The prevalence of HIV infection (8.5%) was more than seven times that found in the general population of the city. Eight of the HIV-positive participants (67.0%) reported receiving antiretroviral treatment but almost all of them had unsuppressed virus (87.5%). The majority of participants (57.4%) reported symptoms consistent with major depressive disorder. Severe economic distress (60.3%) and homelessness were common (57%). Polysubstance use was nearly universal, 72.1% had experienced multiple overdoses and prior medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment episodes (79.9%), but few currently engaged in addiction care. The prevalence, multiplicity and severity of chronic health and socioeconomic problems highlight consequences of the current opioid epidemic and underscore the urgent need to develop integrated models of treatment.

RESUMEN: Utilizando un Centro de Investigación Móvil, inscribimos a 141 usuarios de opioides del vecindario de Filadelfia, un epicentro urbano de la epidemia de opioides. Casi todos (95,6%) cumplieron con los criterios del DSM-5 para el trastorno del uso severo del consumo de opioides. La prevalencia de la infección de VIH (8,5%) fue másﹶ de 7 veces superior a las encontrada en la población general de la ciudad. Ocho de los participantes con VIH positivo (67,0%) reportaron haber recibido tratamiento antirretroviral pero casi todos tuvieron virus no suprimido (87,5%). La mayoría de los participantes (57,4%) informaron síntomas compatibles con el Desorden Depresivo Mayor. La angustia severa por lo económico (60,3%) y las personas sin hogar fueron comunes (57%). El uso de múltiples sustancias fue casi universal, el 721% había experimentado múltiples sobredosis y previos medicamentos para el tratamiento del trastorno por consumo de opioides (MOUD) (79,9%), pero muy pocos estaban comprometidos con la atención a las adicciones. La prevalencia, la multiplicidad y la seriedad de los problemas de salud crónica y los problemas socioeconómicos destacan las consecuencias de la actual epidemia de opioides y subrayan la urgente necesidad de desarrollar nuevos modelos de tratamiento integrados.

Adherence among HIV-positive injection drug users undergoing methadone treatment in Taiwan.

AIMS: The study aims were to investigate adherence to methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and to identify associated clinical factors in patients who inject drugs diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Taiwan. METHODS: Data were from the National Health Surveillance System on HIV and the National Drug Treatment System on MMT. HIV-positive people who inject drugs (HIVPWID) were defined as the study population. Information obtained included age, sex, education, marital status, employment, methadone dose, and date of diagnosis of HIV infection. Adherence was defined as taking methadone for the past 90, 180 and 365 days, then categorized as high (> 90%), moderate (51 to 90%), or low (<=50%) adherent respectively. RESULTS: Of 1641 HIVPWID registered in the datasets from 2007 to 2012, 961 (58.56%) had received MMT. For HIVPWID evaluated at 90 days (n = 951), 271 (28.5%), 382 (40.2%), and 298 (31.3%) were classified as high, moderate, and low adherent respectively. For HIVPWID evaluated at 180 days (n = 936), 190 (20.3%), 349 (37.3%), and 397 (42.4%) were classified as high, moderate, and low adherent respectively. For HIVPWID evaluated at 365 days (n = 919), 133 (14.5%), 271 (29.5%), and 515 (56.0%) were classified as high, moderate, and low adherent respectively. After controlling for sociodemographics, results showed that methadone dose, location of MMT clinic, and date of HIV diagnosis were significantly associated with MMT adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings underscore the importance to MMT adherence of methadone dosage, early diagnosis of patient's HIV infection, and area of patient residence.