CPEB3 overexpression caused by miR-106b-5p inhibition inhibits esophageal carcinoma in-vitro progression and metastasis.

This study investigates the role of CPEB3 in esophageal cancer (EC) progression. The prognosis of EC patients was shown by survival analysis. CPEB3-targeting microRNAs were predicted by bioinformatics tools and further validated by dual-luciferase assay and RNA immunoprecipitation. CPEB3 expression in EC cell lines and EC tissues was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. The viabilities of KYSE150 and EC9706 cells were measured by MTT and Cell Counting Kit-8 assays. The migration, invasion and tube formation of KYSE150 and EC9706 cells were examined by wound healing, Transwell and tube formation assay, respectively. E-cadherin, N-cadherin, fibronectin, vimentin and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [and phosphorylation (p)] and STAT3 levels (and phosphorylation) in KYSE150 and EC9706 cells were determined by western blot analysis or quantitative reverse transcription PCR. In addition, a xenograft tumor model was established through subcutaneously implanting KYSE150 and EC9706 cells transfected with Lv-CPEB3 or Lv-control viruses. CPEB3 expression was downregulated in EC cells and tissues, and its overexpression inhibited viability, migration, invasion and the expressions of N-cadherin, fibronectin, vimentin and VEGF, EGFR, p-EGFR and p-STAT3 levels in KYSE150 cells, but promoted E-cadherin expression. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-CPEB3 inversely affected these phenotypes and gene expressions in EC9706 cells. miR-106b-5p targeted CPEB3 and negatively regulated CPEB3 expression. miR-106b-5p mimics reversed the effect of CPEB3 overexpression on KYSE150 cells, and miR-106b-5p inhibitor reversed the effect of siRNA-CPEB3 on EC9706 cells. In mice, tumor volumes, weights and Ki-67 expression were lower in mice treated with Lv-CPEB3 than that with Lv-control. CPEB3 overexpressed by miR-106b-5p inhibition suppressed EC progression involved in EGFR and STAT3 signaling.

microRNA-1321 and microRNA-7515 contribute to the progression of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting CDC20.

Cell division cycle 20 (CDC20) and microRNAs (miRNAs) are differentially expressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current study aimed to investigate the role of miR-1321 and miR-7515 regulation in CDC20 during NSCLC development. CDC20 expression in paracancerous and tumor tissues was assessed using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The relationship between CDC20 expression and prognosis of patients was analyzed using the TCGA database. The expression profile of CDC20 in healthy lung cells and NSCLC cells was detected using qRT-PCR and western blotting. After the knockdown of CDC20 in NSCLC cells, the cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion, and cell cycle changes were investigated by CCK8, EdU, flow cytometry, wound healing, and Transwell assays. The miRNAs targeting CDC20 were predicted using two bioinformatics websites and validated using dual-luciferase assays. CDC20 was enhanced in NSCLC tissues and cells, thus predicting the poor prognosis in NSCLC patients. After CDC20 inhibition, the malignant phenotype of NSCLC cells was reverted. miR-1321 and miR-7515 targeted CDC20 and exhibited the same anti-tumor effects as CDC20 silencing. Functional rescue experiments showed that CDC20 overexpression averted the anti-tumor effects of miR-1321 and miR-7515 on NSCLC cells. miR-1321 and miR-7515 inhibited NSCLC development by targeting CDC20. Thus, the current study has implications in NSCLC treatment and provides novel insights into NSCLC management.

The relative and absolute benefit of programmed death receptor-1 vs programmed death ligand 1 therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown promising results in treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our objective was to compare the relative and absolute benefits between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to Dec 1, 2019, for randomized controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors that had available overall survival (OS) data in NSCLC. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled estimates. RESULTS: Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (15,797 patients) of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included in the analysis. PD-1 inhibitors significantly extended OS compared with standard of care therapy (difference in means, 4.80 months, 95% CI 3.41-6.18; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66-0.78; P < 0.01 for both). PD-L1 inhibitors also significantly improved OS compared with standard of care therapy (difference in means, 2.59 months 95% CI 1.47-3.71; HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.88; P < 0.01 for both). More importantly, PD-1 inhibitors had significantly higher OS than PD-L1 inhibitors (difference in means, P = 0.015; HR, P = 0.006). The same increased OS benefit was observed in patients with PD-L1 ≥1% (P = 0.035) and PD-L1 <1% (P = 0.007). However, OS did not differ between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with an EGFR mutation-positive status (P = 0.724) and who were never smokers (P = 0.999). CONCLUSIONS: PD-1 inhibitors showed superior relative and absolute OS benefits compared with PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. These findings have implications for treatment selection in current clinical practice and future study design.

Comparison of outcomes of pedicled jejunal and colonic conduit for esophageal reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: At present, the gastric tube is the first choice for esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy for various benign and malignant diseases. However, when the stomach is not available, a pedicled jejunum or colon is used to reconstruct the esophagus. The present study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes and quality of life of patients receiving jejunal and colonic conduits. METHODS: In the present retrospective study, the clinical data of 71 patients with esophageal carcinoma, who received jejunal reconstruction (jejunum group, n = 34) and colonic reconstruction (colon group, n = 37) from 2005 to 2015, were compared. RESULTS: Compared with the colon group, the jejunum group had a lower incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage, lesser duration of postoperative drainage, and faster recovery. Furthermore, the scores were better in the jejunum group than in the colon group, in terms of short-term overall quality of life, physical function and social relationships. Moreover, the jejunal group had a significantly lower frequency of pH < 4 simultaneous reflux time > 5 min (N45) and the longest reflux time (LT) at 24 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION: In esophageal cancer, when gastric tube construction is not feasible, a pedicled jejunum may be preferred over a colonic conduit due to lower incidence of acid reflux, anastomotic leakage and higher postoperative short-term quality of life, and rapid postoperative recovery.

Association of PD-L1 expression status with the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and overall survival in solid tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Whether PD-L1-positive patients derive more overall survival benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced solid tumours is unclear. We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane library and EMBASE databases from January 1, 1966 to March 1, 2019, to identify randomised controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab) that had available hazard ratios (HRs) for death according to PD-L1 status. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled overall survival (OS) HR and 95% CI among PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients. An interaction test was performed to evaluate the heterogeneity between the two estimates. A total of 24 randomised trials, involving 12,966 participants, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. An OS benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was found in both PD-L1-positive patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.70) and PD-L1-negative patients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.91) even at the minimum cut-off value of 1%. Significant differences in the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients were noted at different cut-off values. Moreover, there was a positive dose-response relationship between PD-L1 positivity and OS benefit (HR for 1%, 0.58, [0.50, 0.67]; 5%, 0.52 [0.43, 0.64]; 10%, 0.50 [0.40, 0.63]). Subgroup analyses showed that these results were generally consistent, regardless of study design, line of treatment, treatment type, tumour type, PD-L1 staining cell type and median follow-up time. We demonstrated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved OS in both PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative patients compared to controls, but the magnitude of benefit was clinically PD-L1-dependent.

The prognostic value of PKM2 and its correlation with tumour cell PD-L1 in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of PKM2 and its correlation with tumour cell PD-L1 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is unclear. METHODS: A total of 506 lung adenocarcinoma samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and 173 LUAD tumour tissues from Jiangxi Cancer Hospital were used to analyse the correlation between PKM2 and PD-L1 expression. We further established a stable LUAD cell line with PKM2 knockdown and confirmed the association via Western blotting and flow cytometry analysis. Moreover, the prognostic values of PKM2 and PD-L1 were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Based on the above two large cohorts, we found that PKM2 was significantly positively associated with PD-L1 expression (r = 0.132, P = 0.003 and r = 0.287, P < 0.001, respectively). Subsequently, we found that PKM2 knockdown substantially inhibited PD-L1 expression in the A549 LUAD cell line. Moreover, survival analysis showed that higher expression of PKM2 was correlated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in lung adenocarcinoma patients (P < 0.001 and P = 0.050, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that lung adenocarcinoma patients who expressed high PKM2 and PD-L1 levels experienced the poorest OS and DFS. Additionally, multivariate analysis suggested that high PKM2 and PD-L1 expression was an independent prognostic indicator for worse OS and DFS (HR = 1.462, P < 0.001 and HR = 1.436, P = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that PKM2 regulated PD-L1 expression and was associated with poor outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Incidence of Ipilimumab-Related Serious Adverse Events in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Little is known about the incidence of ipilimumab-related serious adverse events (SAEs) across various tumor types, drug doses and treatment regimens. Methods: PubMed database was searched up to November, 2017 to identify prospective clinical trials of ipilimumab therapy for adult patients with cancer. Comparisons of the incidence were based on the χ2 test in univariate analysis and the logistic regression model in multivariate analysis. Results: Twenty-four studies (4549 patients) with 35 independent study cohorts (21 melanoma, 6 prostate cancer, 5 NSCLC, and 3 SCLC cohorts) of ipilimumab were included in the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of SAEs during ipilimumab mono-therapy was 26.1% (95% CI, 21.1%-31.8%). SAEs were more frequent in the 10 mg/kg groups than in the 3 mg/kg groups (35.9% vs 17.3%; P < 0.001). Combination therapy showed significantly higher incidence than mono-therapy in melanoma (33.8% vs 25.0%; P = 0.002). After adjustment for potential confounders, multivariable analyses demonstrated lower odds of SAEs in NSCLC (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.69, P < 0.001) and SCLC (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.54, P < 0.001) compared with melanoma. The 10mg/kg cohort presented significantly higher odds than the 3mg/kg (OR 2.84, 95% CI 2.35-3.43, P < 0.001). The combination therapy showed significantly higher odds than the mono-therapy (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.71, P = 0.003). Conclusions: The incidence of ipilimumab-related SAEs was higher in melanoma, the 10mg/kg group and during combination therapy. Clinicians should enhance awareness of these risk factors in clinical practice and carefully monitor patients.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Events During Lapatinib Therapy: A Meta-Analysis From 12,402 Patients With Cancer.

Lapatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as an anticancer therapeutic agent, has adverse events associated with treatment resulting in noncompliance and withdrawal from the therapy. Here, we performed meta-analysis of published clinical trials to determine relative risk (RR) and incidence of gastrointestinal events during lapatinib therapy in patients with cancer. A comprehensive literature search was performed and summary incidence, RR, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of trials. Thirty-six trials with 12,402 patients were included; summary incidences of all-grade gastrointestinal events in patients with cancer were diarrhea 57.8%, nausea 30.8%, and vomiting 19.6%. Lapatinib combination with chemotherapy or any anti-HER2 mAbs were associated with significant risk of all-grade diarrhea [(RR 3.64, 95% CI, 2.96-4.49), (RR 2.89, 95% CI, 2.21-3.79), respectively] and high-grade diarrhea [(RR 11.25, 95% CI, 7.31-17.33), (RR 9.96, 95% CI, 7.23-13.72), respectively], and lapatinib combination with chemotherapy group showed a significantly increased risk of all-grade nausea (RR 1.54, 95% CI, 1.25-1.89). Lapatinib combination with chemotherapy or any anti-HER2 mAbs were associated with significant risk of all-grade vomiting [(RR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.12-1.93), (RR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.11-1.52), respectively]. Lapatinib combination with any anti-HER2 mAbs was associated with a significant risk of high-grade vomiting (RR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.41-3.61). This study revealed a significantly increased risk of diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in patients with cancer receiving lapatinib, suggesting that appropriate clinical intervention and gastrointestianal protective agents should be emphasized.

Enhanced expression of PKM2 associates with the biological properties of cancer stem cells from A549 human lung cancer cells.

Cancer cells express the M2 isoform of glycolytic enzyme pyruvate kinase (PKM2) for favoring the survival under a hypoxic condition. Considering the relative low oxygen microenvironment in stem cell niche, we hypothesized that an enhanced PKM2 expression associates with the biological properties of cancer stem cells. We used A549 human lung cancer cell line and surgical resected lung cancer tissue samples from patients for experiments. We confirmed the co-localization of PKM2 and CD44, a popular marker for cancer stem cells in lung cancer tissue samples from patients. The expression of PKM2 was clearly observed in approximately 80% of the A549 human lung cancer cells. Remarkably, enhanced expression of PKM2 was specially observed in these cells that also positively expressed CD44. Downregulation of PKM2 in CD44+ cancer stem cells by siRNA significantly impaired the potency for spheroid formation, decreased the cell survival under fetal bovine serum deprivation and hypoxic conditions, but increased their sensitivity to anti-cancer drug of cisplatin and γ-ray. The enhanced expression of PKM2 seems to associate with the biological properties of cancer stem cells from A549 human lung cancer cells. Selective targeting of PKM2 may provide a new strategy for cancer therapy, especially for patients with therapeutic resistance.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Events During Vandetanib Therapy in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials.

Vandetanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as an anticancer therapeutic agent, has adverse events associated with treatment resulting in noncompliance and withdrawal from the therapy. Here, we performed meta-analysis of published clinical trials to determine relative risk (RR) and incidence of gastrointestinal events during vandetanib therapy in patients with cancer. A comprehensive literature search was performed and summary incidence, RR, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of trials. Twenty-two trials with 6382 patients were included summary incidences of all-grade gastrointestinal events in patients with cancer were anorexia 24% (95% CI, 20%-28%), constipation 17% (95% CI, 13%-20%), diarrhea 46% (95% CI, 40%-53%), nausea 29% (95% CI, 25%-33%), and vomiting 17% (95% CI, 14%-21%). Incidences of vandetanib-associated gastrointestinal events stratified by tumor histology were statistically insignificant. Vandetanib was associated with a significant risk of all-grade diarrhea (RR 1.75, 95% CI, 1.42-2.16) and high-grade diarrhea (RR 1.94, 95% CI, 1.43-2.64) and significantly decreased risk of all-grade constipation (RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.71-0.91). Summary RR showed a significant risk of vandetanib-associated constipation (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.93) and diarrhea (all-grade: RR 1.68, 95% CI, 1.31-2.14 and high-grade: RR 1.57, 95% CI, 1.14-2.17) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. This study revealed a significantly increased risk of diarrhea and a reduced risk of constipation in patients with cancer receiving vandetanib, suggesting that appropriate and frequent clinical monitoring should be emphasized.

Risk of Hypertension With Sorafenib Use in Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis From 20,494 Patients.

Sorafenib is a new multikinase inhibitor; the incidence of hypertension (HTN) with sorafenib has been reported to vary substantially among clinical trials. We searched multiple databases to investigate the risk of sorafenib-induced HTN in patients with cancer. A total of 93 trials involving 20,494 patients were selected for this meta-analysis. The relative risks (RRs) of all-grade and high-grade HTN associated with sorafenib were 3.06 (P < 0.001) and 3.33 (P < 0.001). There are no significantly RRs of all-grade, 0.81 (P = 0.047), and high-grade HTN, 0.64 (P = 0.075), in sorafenib monotherapy versus other multitargeted antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The incidence of sorafenib-associated all-grade and high-grade HTN was 21.3% (P < 0.001) and 5.9% (P < 0.001), respectively. The patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and thyroid cancer have high incidence (≥20%) of sorafenib-associated all-grade HTN and high incidence (≥5%) of sorafenib-associated high-grade HTN. The trials with median treatment duration ≥ 4, 5, and 7 months were 21.0% (P < 0.001), 25.4% (P < 0.001), and 27.6% (P < 0.001); progression-free survival ≥ 6, 9, and 12 months were 24.5% (P < 0.001), 26.8% (P < 0.001), and 32.8% (P < 0.001); and overall survival ≥ 12, 18, and 24 months were 18.5% (P < 0.001), 22.5% (P < 0.001), and 25.9% (P < 0.001), respectively. There is a significantly high risk of sorafenib-induced HTN. In comparison between sorafenib and other multitargeted antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, RRs had no significance. The patients with RCC and thyroid cancer have significantly higher incidence of HTN. With prolonged treatment duration, progression-free survival, and overall survival, the incidence of all-grade HTN may increase.

Risk of treatment-related mortality with sorafenib in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of 20 randomly controlled trials : Risk of sorafenib-associated death.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is a relatively new multi-kinase inhibitor used to treat a wide range of cancers. As fatal adverse events from sorafenib therapy are rare, their investigation requires a meta-analysis. Aim of the review To provide a meta-analysis of sorafenib-associated fatal adverse events with the most expansive and current data. METHOD: We searched Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. We also searched abstracts from a number of conferences. Twenty trials of sorafenib were found in 9434 cancer patients, tested against placebos and against other drugs. We calculated relative risks and incidences for sorafenib-associated mortality. RESULTS: Overall incidence of sorafenib-associated mortality was 3.3 %. Patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and thyroid cancer had treatment-related mortality ≥5 %. Patients treated with sorafenib had a significantly greater risk of mortality than those in placebo/control groups, with an RR of 1.75. Subgroup analyses also showed significant differences in sorafenib versus placebo (RR 1.87, 95 % CI 1.23-2.86; I (2) = 0.0 %, P = 0.865); and sorafenib + platinum-based chemotherapy (RR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.15-3.59; I (2) = 0.0 %, P = 0.654). However, sorafenib had lower risk than other multi-targeted antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients with RCC and non-small-cell lung carcinoma were significantly more vulnerable. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib presents a significant risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs) in patients with cancer, especially for RCC or non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and in patients treated with sorafenib + platinum-based chemotherapy. However, compared with other multi-targeted antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sorafenib has a lower risk of FAEs.

[The metastatic pattern of thoracic lymph nodes in 306 patients with lung cancer].

BACKGROUND: To study the metastatic pattern of thoracic lymph nodes in patients with resectable lung cancer. METHODS: From January 1992 to December 2000, radical lobectomy or pneumonectomy and systemic lymphadenectomy were performed in 306 patients with lung cancer. Number, size, colour and hardness of lymph nodes in each region were recorded and neoplastic metastasis was examined by pathology. RESULTS: Out of 4 614 resected lymph nodes from 2 456 regions, 954 lymph nodes from 521 regions were confirmed to have metastasis. The metastatic rates of thoracic lymph nodes and mediastinal lymph nodes were 61.8% and 43.5% , respectively. The metastatic frequencies in regions around the hilar or root of lung (11,10,7,5,4) were higher than those of regions far from the root of lung (9,6,3,2,1). There was a remarkably higher metastatic rate of lymph nodes in small cell lung cancer than that in non small cell lung cancer (P < 0.01 ). The metastatic rate was closely related to size, colour and hardness of lymph nodes (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 , P < 0.001 ). CONCLUSIONS: Most of neoplastic metastasis of lymph nodes spreads from proximal to distal areas, lower to upper regions, and from the hilar to the mediastinal. A few mediastinal lymph nodes show a skipping pattern. It is necessary to perform systemic lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection.

[Carinal resection and bronchial sleeve lobectomy in the treatment of central lung cancer: A report of 105 cases].

BACKGROUND: To summarize the experience of carinal resection and bronchial sleeve lobectomy in the treatment of 105 patients with central lung cancer from November, 1991, to November, 2001. METHODS: A total of 105 patients with central lung cancer underwent pulmonary resection. Carinal resection and reconstruction was performed in 19 patients, bronchial sleeve resection in 81, and bronchial sleeve combined with pulmonary artery sleeve lobectomy in 5. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage, cardiac arrhythmia, asthma, pulmonary atelectasis occurred in 10.5% of total group. The 1-, 3- and 5- year survival rates were 89.9%, 60.0% and 47.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bronchial sleeve lobectomy and double-sleeve lobectomy are capable of excising pulmonary tumor as much as possible while remaining healthy lung tissues. Carinal resection and reconstruction is helpful to extend the surgical indication.