Mechanical Ventilation, Past, Present, and Future.

Mechanical ventilation (MV) has played a crucial role in the medical field, particularly in anesthesia and in critical care medicine (CCM) settings. MV has evolved significantly since its inception over 70 years ago and the future promises even more advanced technology. In the past, ventilation was provided manually, intermittently, and it was primarily used for resuscitation or as a last resort for patients with severe respiratory or cardiovascular failure. The earliest MV machines for prolonged ventilatory support and oxygenation were large and cumbersome. They required a significant amount of skills and expertise to operate. These early devices had limited capabilities, battery, power, safety features, alarms, and therefore these often caused harm to patients. Moreover, the physiology of MV was modified when mechanical ventilators moved from negative pressure to positive pressure mechanisms. Monitoring systems were also very limited and therefore the risks related to MV support were difficult to quantify, predict and timely detect for individual patients who were necessarily young with few comorbidities. Technology and devices designed to use tracheostomies versus endotracheal intubation evolved in the last century too and these are currently much more reliable. In the present, positive pressure MV is more sophisticated and widely used for extensive period of time. Modern ventilators use mostly positive pressure systems and are much smaller, more portable than their predecessors, and they are much easier to operate. They can also be programmed to provide different levels of support based on evolving physiological concepts allowing lung-protective ventilation. Monitoring systems are more sophisticated and knowledge related to the physiology of MV is improved. Patients are also more complex and elderly compared to the past. MV experts are informed about risks related to prolonged or aggressive ventilation modalities and settings. One of the most significant advances in MV has been protective lung ventilation, diaphragm protective ventilation including noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Health care professionals are familiar with the use of MV and in many countries, respiratory therapists have been trained for the exclusive purpose of providing safe and professional respiratory support to critically ill patients. Analgo-sedation drugs and techniques are improved, and more sedative drugs are available and this has an impact on recovery, weaning, and overall patients' outcome. Looking toward the future, MV is likely to continue to evolve and improve alongside monitoring techniques and sedatives. There is increasing precision in monitoring global "patient-ventilator" interactions: structure and analysis (asynchrony, desynchrony, etc). One area of development is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in ventilator technology. AI can be used to monitor patients in real-time, and it can predict when a patient is likely to experience respiratory distress. This allows medical professionals to intervene before a crisis occurs, improving patient outcomes and reducing the need for emergency intervention. This specific area of development is intended as "personalized ventilation." It involves tailoring the ventilator settings to the individual patient, based on their physiology and the specific condition they are being treated for. This approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes by optimizing ventilation and reducing the risk of harm. In conclusion, MV has come a long way since its inception, and it continues to play a critical role in anesthesia and in CCM settings. Advances in technology have made MV safer, more effective, affordable, and more widely available. As technology continues to improve, more advanced and personalized MV will become available, leading to better patients' outcomes and quality of life for those in need.

Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in South African PICUs: A Multisite Point-Prevalence Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (pARDS) and the characteristics of children with pARDS in South African PICUs. DESIGN: Observational multicenter, cross-sectional point-prevalence study. SETTING: Eight PICUs in four South African provinces. PATIENTS: All children beyond the neonatal period and under 18 years of age admitted to participating PICUs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical and demographic data were prospectively collected on a single day of each month, from February to July 2022, using a centralized database. Cases with or at risk of pARDS were identified using the 2015 Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference criteria. Prevalence was calculated as the number of children meeting pARDS criteria/the total number of children admitted to PICU at the same time points. Three hundred ten patients were present in the PICU on study days: 166 (53.5%) male, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 9.8 (3.1-32.9) months, and 195 (62.9%) invasively mechanically ventilated. Seventy-one (22.9%) patients were classified as being "at risk" of pARDS and 95 patients (prevalence 30.6%; 95% CI, 24.7-37.5%) fulfilled pARDS case criteria, with severity classified as mild (58.2%), moderate (25.3%), and severe (17.6%). Median (IQR) admission Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 risk of mortality in patients with and without pARDS was 5.6 (3.4-12.1) % versus 3.9 (1.0-8.2) % ( p = 0.002). Diagnostic categories differed between pARDS and non-pARDS groups ( p = 0.002), with no difference in age, sex, or presence of comorbidities. On multivariable logistic regression, increasing admission risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; p = 0.04) and being admitted with a respiratory condition (aOR 2.64; 95% CI, 1.27-5.48; p = 0.01) were independently associated with an increased likelihood of having pARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The 30.6% prevalence of pARDS in South Africa is substantially higher than reports from other sociogeographical regions, highlighting the need for further research in this setting.

Pediatric Index of Mortality 3-An Evaluation of Function Among ICUs In South Africa.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 as mortality risk assessment model. DESIGN: This prospective study included all admissions 30 days to 18 years old for 12 months during 2016 and 2017. Data gathered included the following: age and gender, diagnosis and reason for PICU admission, data specific for the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 calculation, PICU outcomes (death or survival), and length of PICU stay. SETTING: Nine units that care for children within tertiary or quaternary academic hospitals in South Africa. PATIENTS: All admissions 30 days to 18 years old, excluding premature infants, children who died within 2 hours of admission, or children transferred to other PICUs, and those older than 18 years old. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 3,681 admissions of which 2,253 (61.3%) were male. The median age was 18 months (interquartile range, 6-59.5 mo). There were 354 deaths (9.6%). The Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 predicted 277.47 deaths (7.5%). The overall standardized mortality ratio was 1.28. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.83). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test statistic was 174.4 (p < 0.001). Standardized mortality ratio for all age groups was greater than 1. Standardized mortality ratio for diagnostic subgroups was mostly greater than 1 except for those whose reason for PICU admission was classified as accident, toxin and envenomation, and metabolic which had an standardized mortality ratio less than 1. There were similar proportions of respiratory patients, but significantly greater proportions of neurologic and cardiac (including postoperative) patients in the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 derivation cohort than the South African cohort. In contrast, the South African cohort contained a significantly greater proportion of miscellaneous (including injury/accident victims) and postoperative noncardiac patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 discrimination between death and survival among South African units was good. Case-mix differences between these units and the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 derivation cohort may partly explain the poor calibration. We need to recalibrate Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 to the local setting.

Select men benefit from androgen deprivation therapy delivered with salvage radiation therapy after prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Which men benefit most from adding androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to salvage radiation therapy (SRT) after prostatectomy has not clearly been defined; therefore, we evaluated the impact of ADT to SRT on failure-free survival (FFS) in men with a rising or persistent PSA after prostatectomy. METHODS: We identified 332 men who received SRT after prostatectomy from 1987 to 2010. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified favorable, intermediate and unfavorable groups based on the risk of failure after SRT alone. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests compared FFS with and without ADT. RESULTS: Forty-three percent received SRT alone and 57% received SRT with ADT (median 6.6 months (interquartile range (IQR) 5.8-18.1) ADT). Median SRT dose was 70 Gy (IQR 70-70), and median follow-up after SRT was 6.7 years (IQR 4.5-10.8). On Cox's proportional hazard regression, ADT improved FFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.86; P=0.006). RPA classified unfavorable disease as negative surgical margins (SMs) and preradiation PSA of ⩾0.5 ng ml-1. Favorable disease had neither adverse factor, and intermediate disease had one adverse factor. The addition of ADT to SRT improved 5-year FFS for men with unfavorable disease (70.3% vs 23.4%; P<0.001) and intermediate disease (69.8% vs 48.0%; P=0.003), but not for men with favorable disease (81.2% vs 78.0%; P=0.971). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ADT to SRT appears to improve FFS for men with a preradiation PSA of ⩾0.5 ng ml-1 or with negative SM at prostatectomy. Men with involved surgical margins and PSA <0.5 ng ml-1 appear to be at a lower risk of failure after SRT alone and may not derive as much benefit from the administration of ADT with SRT. These results are hypothesis-generating only, and further prospective data are required to see if ADT can safely be omitted in this select group of men.

Factors associated with improved biochemical response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before definitive radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: In prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy (RT), a pre-RT PSA level 0.5 ng ml(-1), determined after neoadjuvant ADT and before RT, predicts for worse survival measures. The present study sought to identify patient, tumor and treatment characteristics associated with the pre-RT PSA in prostate cancer patients. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients diagnosed with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer and treated with a combination of neoadjuvant (median, 2.2 and 2.5 months, respectively), concurrent, and adjuvant ADT and RT between 1990 and 2011. RESULTS: A total of 170 intermediate- and 283 high-risk patients met inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, both intermediate- and high-risk patients with higher pre-treatment PSA (iPSA) were significantly less likely to achieve a pre-RT PSA <0.5 ng ml(-1) (iPSA 10.1-20 ng ml(-1): P=0.005 for intermediate risk; iPSA 10.1-20 ng ml(-1): P=0.005, iPSA >20 ng ml(-1): P<0.001 for high risk). High-risk patients undergoing total androgen blockade were more likely to achieve a pre-RT PSA <0.5 ng ml(-1) (P=0.031). We observed an interaction between race and type of neoadjuvant ADT (P=0.074); whereas African-American men on total androgen blockade reached pre-RT PSA <0.5 ng ml(-1) as frequently as other men on total androgen blockade (P=0.999), African-American men on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist monotherapy/orchiectomy were significantly less likely to reach pre-RT PSA <0.5 ng ml(-1) compared with other men on LH-RH monotherapy/orchiectomy (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that total androgen blockade in the neoadjuvant period may be beneficial compared with LH-RH monotherapy for achieving a pre-RT PSA <0.5 ng ml(-1) in African-American men with high-risk prostate cancer. In addition, men with higher iPSA are more likely to have a pre-RT PSA greater than 0.5 ng ml(-1) in response to neoadjuvant ADT and are therefore candidates for clinical trials testing newer, more aggressive hormone-ablative therapies.

Addition of short-term androgen deprivation therapy to dose-escalated radiation therapy improves failure-free survival for select men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Dose-escalated (DE) radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improve prostate cancer outcomes over standard-dose RT. The benefit of adding ADT to DE-RT for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PrCa) is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 636 men treated for IR-PrCa with DE-RT (>75Gy). The adult comorbidity evaluation-27 index classifed comorbidity. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests compared failure-free survival (FFS) with and without ADT. RESULTS: Forty-five percent received DE-RT and 55% DE-RT with ADT (median 6 months). On Cox proportional hazard regression that adjusted for comorbidity and tumor characteristics, ADT improved FFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.36; P = 0.004). Recursive partitioning analysis of men without ADT classified Gleason 4 + 3 = 7 or ≥50% positive cores as unfavorable disease. The addition of ADT to DE-RT improved 5-year FFS for men with unfavorable disease (81.6% versus 92.9%; P = 0.009) but did not improve FFS for men with favorable disease (96.3% versus 97.4%; P = 0.874). When stratified by comorbidity, ADT improved FFS for men with unfavorable disease and no or mild comorbidity (P = 0.006) but did not improve FFS for men with unfavorable disease and moderate or severe comorbidity (P = 0.380). CONCLUSION: The addition of ADT to DE-RT improves FFS for men with unfavorable IR-PrCa, especially those with no or minimal comorbidity.

[Image-guided radiotherapy by in-room CT-linear accelerator combination]. / Radiothérapie guidée par tomodensitométrie associée à l'accélérateur linéaire dans la salle de traitement.

Target localization has become increasingly important in the advent of IMRT, as treatment margins are reduced and target doses are increased with high-dose gradients outside this target volume. The in-room CT on rails-LINAC system allows CT imaging while the patient remains immobilized in the treatment position just prior to treatment. The anatomic inter- and intra-fractional variations can be therefore quantified during a course of treatment. The position of the tumour can be checked and corrected before the fraction. In case of modification of tumour shape, a re-planning of the treatment is also feasible. However, several issues remain: the integration with routine clinical treatment due to a lack of software tools, the frequency of imaging, and the cost-efficiency ratio. The clinical experience is yet very limited but CT-image-guided radiotherapy appears promising for prostate, brain and spinal tumours.

Dual radiobiological interpretations of retrospective clinical data: the time factor.

Dual interpretations are different radiobiological mechanisms that explain theoretically the same observed results. Radiobiological interpretations of the time factor are most frequently based on changes in total dose that produce a given effect. If this dose is increased by different mechanisms (e.g. increasing overall time and decreasing dose per fraction) at the same time, proposals for altered fractionation schemes based on the choice of one or the other mechanism, in principle, can lead to erroneous predictions of outcome. This is especially the case when the analyses are based on retrospective clinical data, where the influence of patient selection is unknown. Examples of dual interpretations taken from the literature on head and neck, melanoma and prostate cancer are discussed.

Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The optimal role of radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate bed after radical prostatectomy (RP) is the subject of much debate. In this study, the results of adjuvant RT (ART) and salvage RT (SRT) were compared. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 146 lymph node-negative patients were treated postoperatively after RP with RT to the prostate bed between 1987 and 1998. Of these, 75 patients had an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and were treated with ART for adverse pathologic features only to a median dose of 60 Gy (range 51-70). A positive margin was identified in 96%, and two of the three with negative margins had seminal vesicle involvement (SVI). SRT was administered for either a persistently detectable PSA level after RP (n = 27) or for a delayed rise in PSA (n = 44) to a median dose of 70 Gy (range 60-78). Adjuvant androgen ablation was given to 37 patients; 2 who had received ART and 35 had who received SRT. The median duration of androgen ablation was 24 months. The primary end point was freedom from biochemical failure (bNED), which was considered to be an undetectable PSA level. The median follow-up was 53 months for all patients: 68 months for the ART patients and 35 months for the SRT patients. RESULTS: For the ART group, 8 patients subsequently developed a rising PSA level. The 5-year bNED rate was 88%. SVI was the strongest predictor of outcome, with a 5-year bNED rate of 94% for those without SVI and 65% for those with SVI (p = 0.0002). SVI was the only significant factor in Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the ART cohort. For the SRT group, 20 patients developed a rising PSA level after RT. The 5-year bNED rate was 66% for all SRT patients, and 43% and 78% in those with a persistently detectable PSA and those with a delayed rise in PSA, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, this subdivision of SRT was statistically significant. Moreover, when the Cox model included all patients and variables, the timing of RT (ART vs. SRT) was an independent correlate of bNED, as was androgen ablation. CONCLUSION: For RP patients with high-risk pathologic features, the timing of postoperative RT and the PSA status after RP were strong determinants of outcome. Because of the potential confounding factors, direct comparisons of ART and SRT are problematic; however, ART is extremely effective and offers the surest approach for maintaining biochemical control.

Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: differences based on treatment modality.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy with 103palladium (103Pd) is an increasingly administered treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. We compared general and disease specific health related quality of life after 103Pd treatment, radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy given during the same time frame. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional survey study of patients treated at a single community medical center between 1995 and 1999. We mailed 5 validated health related quality of life survey instruments to 269, 142 and 222 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, 103Pd treatment and external beam radiation therapy, respectively, with a response rate of greater than 80% in all groups. RESULTS: General health related quality of life assessed by the SF-36 showed the same scores in patients who underwent prostatectomy and 103Pd treatment. The University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was used to assess bowel, urinary and sexual function/bothersomeness. External beam radiation therapy reported was associated with worse bowel function and greater bowel bothersomeness. Prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary function compared to 103Pd and external beam radiation therapy. Prostatectomy was associated with worse sexual function than 103Pd or external beam radiation therapy, although nerve sparing surgery and erectile aids minimized the difference. American Urological Association symptom scores were initially higher for 103Pd but became equal to those in the other groups in patients treated greater than 12 months from survey time. Disease-free men who underwent prostatectomy and 103Pd brachytherapy were equally confident that cancer would not recur in the future. Satisfaction rates were equivalent and biochemical failure significantly decreased satisfaction in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: While general health related quality of life was mostly unaffected by the 3 most common treatments for prostate cancer, there were differences in bowel, urinary and sexual function. This information may aid patients in the decision making process.

Clinical staging of prostate cancer: reproducibility and clarification of issues.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for prostate cancer adopted in 1992 is based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) designations. It has been widely accepted for use in local and advanced disease. The purpose of this study was to assess reproducibility of staging among observers and to help clarify staging issues. Twelve prostate cancer cases were sent to 20 physicians with special expertise in prostate cancer including eight urologists, eight radiation oncologists, and four medical oncologists. Physicians were asked to assign a stage based on the 1992 AJCC clinical staging. The most frequently reported stage assigned to each case was taken to be the consensus. Agreement was the percentage of physicians who reported that particular stage. Seventy-five percent of the physicians responded. The overall agreement for assignment of T stage was 63.9%. Differences were found by specialty for inclusion of available information in designating a T stage. The overall agreement for N stage was 73.8%. The most common designation was Nx regardless of availability of a computed tomography scan. The overall agreement for M stage was 76.6%. Without a bone scan the most common designation was Mx regardless of Gleason grade or prostate-specific antigen (PSA). A frequent comment was that PSA was more indicative of disease extent than current clinical staging. The reproducibility of the 1992 clinical AJCC staging is poor even among experts in the field. This problem arises primarily from disagreement regarding which studies are included in assigning a stage. Some of these difficulties are addressed in the 1997 revision. However, the clinical staging does not address the true biological significance of disease in many instances.

Overexpression of p53 in prostate carcinoma is associated with improved overall survival but not predictive of response to radiotherapy.

p53 gene mutations are among the most common specific genetic alterations in human cancer. Inactivation of p53 and subsequent protein accumulation has been implicated in a variety of human malignancies and associated with prostate cancer progression. In this study, we assessed p53 protein overexpression and gene mutations in prostate carcinoma and investigated associations between p53 alterations and clinicopathological parameters, survival, and response to radiotherapy. We evaluated 58 archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded prostate carcinomas to detect abnormal p53 nuclear protein accumulation using immunohistochemistry. p53 mutational status of tumor DNA was evaluated using polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of exons 5-9 and confirmed by direct DNA sequencing. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis was used to determine the association of p53 status with clinical characteristics and response to radiotherapy. Overexpression of p53 was detected in 42 (72%) of 58 primary prostate carcinomas, but was undetectable in 7 samples of benign prostatic hyperplasias or 5 samples of normal prostate tissue. p53 exon 5-9 mutations were detected in 8 (14%) of 58 patient specimens. p53 mutational status, but not overexpression, was associated with higher Gleason scores (p=0.0145). Neither p53 overexpression nor mutation was associated with clinical stage, biochemical disease-free probability, or predictive of response to radiotherapy. p53 protein accumulation was inversely associated with improved overall survival (p=0.0108). Our studies demonstrate that p53 protein accumulation is a frequent alteration in prostate cancer. The disparity between p53 protein overexpression and p53 exon 5-9 mutations suggests the possibility of mutations outside this region or stabilization of wild-type p53 by alternative mechanisms. In our patient population, p53 protein overexpression or mutational status was not predictive of outcome in patients treated with radiation therapy. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the association between p53 protein overexpression and improved overall survival.

Fifteen-year minimum follow-up of a prostate brachytherapy series: comparing the past with the present.

OBJECTIVES: To report the overall survival for 126 patients more than 15 years after iodine-125 interstitial therapy; to report the biochemical progression status for those alive and clinically without evidence of disease for longer than 15 years; to document the upward migration of grade by date of grade assignment; to compare the tumor stage and grade profile of this mature series with our current experience; and to clarify the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) data when this series is used as a historical comparison. METHODS: The records of 126 patients who underwent interstitial therapy more than 15 years previously were reviewed for assessment of the current TNM stage and Gleason grade and the current PSA level for patients clinically free of disease. The tumor grade and stage of these patients were compared with those of the first 126 patients treated by transrectal ultrasound-guided brachymonotherapy at our center between January 1995 and January 1999. The methodology of our 1993 publication was also reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 16 patients clinically free of disease (13 still alive and 3 dead of other causes more than 15 years after therapy), a review of the initial diagnostic needle biopsy was unable to confirm the presence of tumor in 3 patients. Of the remaining 13, 4 had a PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or less, 4 a PSA level between 0.21 and 0.9 ng/mL, and 5 a PSA level between 1 and 2.5 ng/mL. Re-evaluation of the histopathologic findings using current criteria increased the Gleason score and World Health Organization grade. Patients currently selected for brachytherapy have a lower Gleason grade and TNM stage than recorded for patients treated in the past. The actuarial progression probability curves using the 0.5 or less cutpoint published in 1993 represented the best possible outcome and cannot serve as a historical control for current series comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who were alive and clinically free of disease longer than 15 years after therapy, the biochemical PSA levels were low. This may be attributed to the therapeutic radiation effect. Whether the improved technology of current transrectal ultrasound-guided implants can extend these favorable results from a small minority to a significant majority and whether it can approach the therapeutic results of radical prostatectomy may be partially answered with a longer follow-up of the current series. The histopathologic criteria have been refined, and upgrading from the initially assigned grade is common. In some cases, a prostate cancer diagnosis could not be confirmed. These findings limit the ability to match patients across time and institution. The results of our 1993 report of biochemical chemical progression-free probability 10 years after iodine-125 implantation cannot be used as a comparator for current studies. Ultimately, a valid comparison between treatment options will only be achieved through a randomized controlled trial.

The durability of external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: can it be identified?

PURPOSE: We establish criteria to identify a durable response to external beam radiation therapy by calculation of biochemical progression-free probability for patients who attained and maintained defined nadir prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels more than 5 years after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 460 patients were treated with external beam radiation monotherapy from 1976 to 1995. Patients with PSA less than 0.5 (group 1) or 0.5 to 1.0 (group 2) ng./ml. more than 5 years after treatment were identified. Treatment failure was defined as 3 consecutive increases in PSA after nadir. Progression-free probability after 60 months was calculated for each group. A comparison was also made to patients achieving the same nadir levels anytime after treatment. RESULTS: Failure occurred at 133 months in 1 of 26 group 1 patients (4%) and at a median of 76 months in 5 of 26 group 2 patients (19%). At 10 years progression-free probability was 91% for group 1 compared to 72% for group 2 (p = 0.0575). These same nadir levels anytime after treatment were associated with higher failure rates of 55% for group 1 and 72% for group 2. CONCLUSIONS: If a PSA nadir of less than 0.5 ng./ml. was maintained 5 years after therapy, subsequent failure was rare. Although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.0575), a higher failure rate was noted if the nadir PSA was 0.5 to 1.0 ng./ml. at 5 years. Thus, patients with PSA 0.5 to 1.0 ng./ml. require careful continued surveillance. Nadir levels less than 1.0 ng./ml. anytime before 5 years were associated with a substantial risk of subsequent progression.

Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional pooled analysis.

CONTEXT: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evaluation leads to the early detection of both prostate cancer and recurrences following primary treatment. Prostate-specific antigen outcome information on patients 5 or more years following treatment is limited and available mainly as single-institution reports. OBJECTIVES: To assess the likelihood and durability of tumor control using PSA evaluation 5 or more years after radical external beam radiation therapy and to identify pretreatment prognostic factors in men with early prostate cancer treated since 1988, the PSA era. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective, nonrandomized, multi-institutional pooled analysis of patients treated with external beam radiation therapy alone between 1988 and 1995 at 6 US medical centers. Follow-up lasted up to a maximum of 9 years. Outcome data were analyzed using Cox regression and recursive partitioning techniques. PATIENTS: A total of 1765 men with stage T1b, T1c, and T2 tumors treated between 1988 and 1995 with external beam radiation. The majority (58%) of patients were older than 70 years and 24.2% had initial PSA values of 20 ng/mL or higher. A minimum of 2 years of subsequent follow-up was required for participation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Actuarial estimates of freedom from biochemical failure. RESULTS: The 5-year estimates of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and the freedom from biochemical failure are 85.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.5%-87.6%), 95.1% (95% CI, 94.0%-96.2%), and 65.8% (95% CI, 62.8%-68.0%), respectively. The PSA failure-free rates 5 and 7 years after treatment for patients presenting with a PSA of less than 10 ng/mL were 77.8% (95% CI, 74.5%-81.3%), and 72.9% (95% CI, 67.9%-78.2%). Recursive partitioning analysis of initial PSA level, palpation stage, and the Gleason score groupings yielded 4 separate prognostic groups: group 1, included patients with a PSA level of less than 9.2 ng/mL; group 2, PSA level of at least 9.2 but less than 19.7 ng/mL; group 3, PSA level at least 19.7 ng/mL and a Gleason score of 2 to 6; and group 4, PSA level of at least 19.7 ng/mL and a Gleason score of 7 to 10. The estimated rates of survival free of biochemical failure at 5 years are 81 % for group 1, 69% for group 2, 47% for group 3, and 29% for group 4. Of the 302 patients followed up beyond 5 years who were free of biochemical disease, 5.0% relapsed from the fifth to the eighth year. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated PSA control rates in this pooled analysis are similar to those of single institutions. These rates indicate the probability of success for subsets of patients with tumors of several prognostic category groupings. These results represent a multi-institutional benchmark for evidence-based counseling of prostate cancer patients about radiation treatment.

PSA for outcome prediction and posttreatment evaluation following radiation for prostate cancer: do we know how to use it?

Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to be a powerful predictor of expected outcome after radiation for prostate cancer. Additional measures such as recursive partitioning analysis and PSA Cancer Volume calculations are further refining this useful tool to provide the greatest degree of prognostic information. The post-treatment PSA level is also being used as a means to assess therapeutic efficacy rapidly and objectively. Although no single PSA value has been shown to equate to long-term clinical tumor control consistently, consensus has been reached regarding the value of a rising PSA level as an early surrogate for tumor recurrence. Since the first introduction of PSA as a tumor marker, we have become much more comfortable with what it means, the ways it can help us, and how to use it.

High dose rate vaginal brachytherapy in early stage endometrial carcinoma: preliminary analysis.

From 1987 to 1993, 69 women diagnosed with FIGO stages I and II carcinoma of the endometrium underwent postoperative adjuvant irradiation (RT) under protocol with high dose rate (HDR) afterloading vaginal apex brachytherapy. All patients initially underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy. Forty-four women received HDR brachytherapy alone and 25 received external beam RT as well as HDR brachytherapy. The median follow-up was 45 months. The 5-year disease-free survival was 92% and the overall survival rate was 79%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that grade, age, and stage were significant predictors of survival. The overall acute and late side effects were minimal. It appears that HDR vaginal brachytherapy is prevention of vaginal recurrence in endometrial carcinoma and should be considered an effective treatment option.

Prostate-specific antigen after radiation therapy. Prognosis by pretreatment level and post-treatment nadir.

After external beam radiation therapy, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most powerful predictor of outcome as measured PSA (biochemical) failure. The post-treatment nadir levels of PSA that predict best for subsequent freedom from PSA failure are debatable, and many nadir levels have been proposed as targets. Although lower nadirs generally are associated with superior outcomes, the identification of a single absolute nadir level was not selected at a recent ASTRO consensus conference. Rather, three consecutive PSA rises above the nadir, with date of failure at the midpoint between the nadir and first rise, were selected as a more useful end point for treatment failure.

Breast cancer during pregnancy: quantifying the risk of treatment delay.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of axillary nodal metastases due to delayed treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy. METHODS: A mathematical model using recently published data was developed to correlate primary breast tumor size with the percentage of pathologically positive axillary lymph nodes. Using this relationship obtained from pathologic data and the accepted relationship of tumor growth and time, Y2 = Y1e(In2)n/DT, an equation estimating the increased risk of axillary metastases due to each day of treatment delay was derived: delta X = 3.7 n/DT, where X = percent positive axillary lymph nodes, n = number of days delay in treatment, and DT = tumor doubling time. RESULTS: A 1-month delay in treatment for an early-stage primary breast cancer with a 130-day doubling time increases the risk of axillary lymph node involvement by 0.9%. A 3-month delay increases the risk by 2.6%, and a 6-month delay by 5.1%. For breast cancer with a 65-day doubling time, a 1-month delay increases the risk by 1.8%, a 3-month delay by 5.2%, and a 6-month delay by 10.2%. CONCLUSION: Axillary lymph nodes are the most important prognostic indicator for survival in breast cancer. Our mathematical model suggests the daily increased risk of axillary metastases due to treatment delay is 0.028% for tumors with moderate doubling times of 130 days and 0.057% for tumors with rapid doubling times of 65 days. This minimal maternal risk may be acceptable to some third-trimester pregnant women with early breast cancer, who prefer organ-sparing treatment with radiation after delivery to a mastectomy during pregnancy. This model further quantitates the increased risk of mortality borne by pregnant women whose breast cancer diagnosis is delayed.