RESUMO
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of transarterial injection of a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension combined with Emprint miriplatin-iodized oil suspension-microwave ablation in patients with medium-sized (3-5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included a total of 11 patients with 12 hepatocellular carcinomas (mean size, 3.6 ± 0.6 cm) underwent miriplatin-iodized oil suspension-microwave ablation. Microwave ablation was performed under the guidance of computed tomography fluoroscopy following transarterial miriplatin-iodized oil suspension injection on the same day. Technical success, complications, and local tumor progression were assessed. Results: The primary and secondary technical success rates were 75.0% and 100%, respectively. The number of treatment sessions per nodule was 1.25 ± 0.45. A total 15 sessions were required to achieve technical success (one session in nine lesions, two sessions in three lesions). Two major complications (pneumothorax [n = 1] and hemorrhage [n = 1]) occurred (2/15, 13.3%). No local tumor progression was observed during the follow-up period (mean 12.0 ± 2.0 months, range 2.7-23.9 months). Conclusions: Miriplatin-iodized oil suspension-microwave ablation for medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas can be safely performed with good local control.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the technical efficacy and complications of the transarterial injection of a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 123 HCCs in 101 patients treated with the transarterial injection of a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension and RFA (MPT-RFA) (maximum diameter: 1.5 [Formula: see text] 0.5 cm, range: 0.6-3.0 cm) and 68 HCCs in 49 patients treated with the transarterial injection of a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension and MWA (MPT-MWA) (maximum diameter: 1.6 [Formula: see text] 0.7 cm, range: 0.5-3.0 cm). Technical success was defined as the achievement of an ablative margin of at least 5 mm for each tumor. Technical success, complications, and local tumor progression were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The initial technical success rate was significantly higher with MPT-MWA (94.1%) than with MPT-RFA (76.4%; P = 0.003). The number of treatment sessions per nodule was significantly lower with MPT-MWA (1.1) than with MPT-RFA (1.3) (P = 0.004). The major complication rates were similar with MPT-RFA (5.8%) and MPT-MWA (2.7%) (P = 0.391). The one-year local tumor progression rate was similar between MPT-RFA (0%) and MPT-MWA (0%) (P = 0.73). CONCLUSION: MPT-MWA may have improved therapeutic efficiency in the treatment of small HCCs.
