RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Machine learning (ML) shows promise for the automation of routine tasks related to the treatment of pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) such as tumor grading, typing, and segmentation. Moreover, it has been shown that ML can identify crucial information from medical images that is otherwise currently unattainable. For example, ML appears to be capable of preoperatively identifying the underlying genetic status of pLGG. METHODS: In this chapter, we reviewed, to the best of our knowledge, all published works that have used ML techniques for the imaging-based evaluation of pLGGs. Additionally, we aimed to provide some context on what it will take to go from the exploratory studies we reviewed to clinically deployed models. RESULTS: Multiple studies have demonstrated that ML can accurately grade, type, and segment and detect the genetic status of pLGGs. We compared the approaches used between the different studies and observed a high degree of variability throughout the methodologies. Standardization and cooperation between the numerous groups working on these approaches will be key to accelerating the clinical deployment of these models. CONCLUSION: The studies reviewed in this chapter detail the potential for ML techniques to transform the treatment of pLGG. However, there are still challenges that need to be overcome prior to clinical deployment.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Currently, the BRAF status of pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) patients is determined through a biopsy. We established a nomogram to predict BRAF status non-invasively using clinical and radiomic factors. Additionally, we assessed an advanced thresholding method to provide only high-confidence predictions for the molecular subtype. Finally, we tested whether radiomic features provide additional predictive information for this classification task, beyond that which is embedded in the location of the tumor. METHODS: Random forest (RF) models were trained on radiomic and clinical features both separately and together, to evaluate the utility of each feature set. Instead of using the traditional single threshold technique to convert the model outputs to class predictions, we implemented a double threshold mechanism that accounted for uncertainty. Additionally, a linear model was trained and depicted graphically as a nomogram. RESULTS: The combined RF (AUC: 0.925) outperformed the RFs trained on radiomic (AUC: 0.863) or clinical (AUC: 0.889) features alone. The linear model had a comparable AUC (0.916), despite its lower complexity. Traditional thresholding produced an accuracy of 84.5%, while the double threshold approach yielded 92.2% accuracy on the 80.7% of patients with the highest confidence predictions. CONCLUSION: Models that included radiomic features outperformed, underscoring their importance for the prediction of BRAF status. A linear model performed similarly to RF but with the added benefit that it can be visualized as a nomogram, improving the explainability of the model. The double threshold technique was able to identify uncertain predictions, enhancing the clinical utility of the model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomic features and tumor location are both predictive of BRAF status in pLGG patients. We show that they contain complementary information and depict the optimal model as a nomogram, which can be used as a non-invasive alternative to biopsy. KEY POINTS: ⢠Radiomic features provide additional predictive information for the determination of the molecular subtype of pediatric low-grade gliomas patients, beyond what is embedded in the location of the tumor, which has an established relationship with genetic status. ⢠An advanced thresholding method can help to distinguish cases where machine learning models have a high chance of being (in)correct, improving the utility of these models. ⢠A simple linear model performs similarly to a more powerful random forest model at classifying the molecular subtype of pediatric low-grade gliomas but has the added benefit that it can be converted into a nomogram, which may facilitate clinical implementation by improving the explainability of the model.
