Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 55(5): 479-82, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23618879

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To improve patient satisfaction with care at an occupational medicine clinic by promoting agenda-setting before the visit. METHODS: We distributed agenda-setting form to 77 randomly selected patients attending an occupational health clinic and used another randomly selected sample of 36 patients as control group. Patients completed a survey regarding the acceptability of this procedure and whether they felt clinicians addressed their important concerns. RESULTS: Most patients found the form helpful (73%) and wanted it offered in future visits (74%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the proportion of patients expressing greatest satisfaction by answering, "strongly agree" (intervention [86%], control [97%]; odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 1.38; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Agenda-setting can improve patient experience before occupational visits but does not improve postvisit satisfaction.


Assuntos
Medicina do Trabalho/métodos , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Humanos , Medicina do Trabalho/normas , Visita a Consultório Médico , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 12: 137, 2012 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22646664

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The benefits of a periodic health evaluation remain debatable. The incremental value added by such evaluations beyond the delivery of age appropriate screening and preventive medicine recommendations is unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on a cohort of consecutive patients presenting for their first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation. We abstracted data on new diagnoses that were identified during this single episode of care and that were not trivial (i.e., required additional testing or intervention). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 491 patients. The rate of new diagnoses per this single episode of care was 0.9 diagnoses per patient. The majority of these diagnoses was not prompted by patients' complaints (71%) and would not have been identified by screening guidelines (51%). Men (odds ratio 2.67; 95% CI, 1.76, 4.03) and those with multiple complaints at presentation (odds ratio 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05, 1.19) were more likely to receive a clinically relevant diagnosis at the conclusion of the visit. Age was not a predictor of receiving a diagnosis in this cohort. CONCLUSION: The first episode of a comprehensive periodic health evaluation may reveal numerous important diagnoses or risk factors that are not always identified through routine screening.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Exame Físico , Prevenção Primária , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...