Risk Factors for 30-Days Mortality After Proximal Femoral Fracture Surgery, a Cohort Study.

Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to identify new risk factors and to confirm previously reported risk factors associated with 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery. Patients and methods: A prospective hip fracture database was used to obtain data. In total, 3523 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2011 and 2021 were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to screen and identify candidate risk factors. Twenty-seven baseline factors and 16 peri-operative factors were included in the univariable analysis and 28 of those factors were included in multivariable analysis. Results: 8.6% of the patients who underwent hip fracture surgery died within 30 days after surgery. Prognostic factors associated with 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery were as follows: age 90-100 years (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.07-19.98, p = 0.041) and above 100 years (OR = 11.3, 95% CI: 1.28-100.26, p = 0.029), male gender (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.97-3.33, p < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 and ASA 4 (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.44-3.14, p < 0.001), medical history of dementia (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.25-2.36, p = 0.001), decreased albumin level (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001), decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), residential status of nursing home (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.44-2.87, p < 0.001), higher Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (KATZ-ADL) score (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.01-1.16, p=0.018) and postoperative pneumonia (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.72-3.38, p < 0.001). Conclusion: A high mortality rate in patients after acute hip fracture surgery is known. Factors that are associated with an increased mortality are age above 90 years, male gender, ASA 3 and ASA 4, medical history of dementia, decreased albumin, decreased GFR, residential status of nursing home, higher KATZ-ADL score and postoperative pneumonia.

The Ratio Between the Infrarenal and Suprarenal Aortic Diameter Is a Predictor of Durable Proximal Seal After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the suprarenal aortic diameter is a predictor for a durable proximal seal after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A total of 439 patients who underwent elective EVAR between 2004 and 2018 in a single vascular referral center met our inclusion criteria. Ratios were calculated by dividing the mean infrarenal neck diameter by 4 different suprarenal aortic diameters. Patients who developed a late type 1A endoleak (n=20) or proximal neck dilatation mandating revision (n=8) were compared with the 411 patients without long-term proximal seal complications. RESULTS: Patients who developed a late type 1A endoleak had more frequently hypertension, a shorter infrarenal neck length, and a larger mean infrarenal neck diameter. The ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to all 4 suprarenal aortic diameters was higher in the late type 1A endoleak group compared with the group without a late type 1A endoleak. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression identified a combination of 6 variables as the best combination to predict a late type 1A endoleak: presence of hypertension, increased mean infrarenal neck diameter, decreased aneurysm neck length, larger ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), larger ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the upper renal artery, and increased ß-angle. Of these, based on both the univariate area under the curve (AUC) and optimal LASSO model restricted to a single predictor, the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA (AUC, 0.770; cutoff value, 0.997) was considered the best prognostic variable. CONCLUSION: The ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA is a good predictor for a late type 1A endoleak. Patients with mean infrarenal neck diameter larger than the diameter proximal to the SMA (ratio >1) are at risk for a late type 1A endoleak. CLINICAL IMPACT: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we found that the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA is a good predictor for a late type 1A endoleak. We conclude that the suprarenal diameter must be taken into account before assessing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair eligibility. Patients with a ratio >1 may not be the best candidates for a durable result after EVAR and may be better off with fenestrated EVAR or open repair.

A Ratio Between Infrarenal and Suprarenal Aortic Diameters Corrects for Absolute Aortic Diameter Variations due to Patients' Sex and Body Size.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic diameters may differ significantly between patients with different gender and body size. The aim of this study was to relate absolute aortic diameters to age, sex, height, and weight of the patients and to correct for these factors by calculating the ratio between the infrarenal and the suprarenal aortic diameters. METHODS: A total of 458 patients who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between 2004 and 2018 were included. The aortic anatomy in this group of elective EVAR patients was compared with a control group of 75 patients without an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aortic diameter was measured at 4 suprarenal points and 4 infrarenal points. Ratios were calculated by dividing the mean infrarenal neck diameter by 4 suprarenal measurements. RESULTS: Patients in the aneurysm group had significantly larger suprarenal and infrarenal aortic diameters. The ratios between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and all 4 suprarenal measurements were larger in the AAA group than in the control group. In both groups, there was a significant correlation between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and sex, height, weight, and body surface area (BSA). However, in both groups, all 4 ratios between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and suprarenal aortic diameters were not correlated with age, sex, height, weight, or BSA, except for the ratio between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and the aortic diameter measurement proximal to the upper renal artery, which was correlated to weight and BSA in the control group. CONCLUSION: The mean infrarenal neck diameter is correlated with sex, height, weight, and BSA. However, when the suprarenal aortic diameter was used as an internal control for the mean infrarenal neck diameter, we were able to correct for these variations in aortic diameters due to sex and body size. The clinical relevance of this ratio in patients treated by EVAR has yet to be assessed in future research. CLINICAL IMPACT: In the assessment for EVAR suitability the absolute diameter of the aneurysm neck is taken into account. We believe that using absolute diameters is not the appropriate way to assess this suitability, but that patient characteristics such as age, gender and body size, should be factored into this assessment. In this paper, we show that suprarenal and infrarenal aortic diameters are both significantly increased in patients with an aneurysm compared with patients without an aneurysm. Besides, we found that mean infrarenal aortic diameter is correlated with sex, height, weight, and body surface area. Finally, we propose a new ratio system, using suprarenal diameters as an internal control, to correct for aortic diameter variations due to sex and body size.

A stable aneurysm sac after endovascular aneurysm repair as a predictor for mortality: An in-depth analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term survival of patients with a stable aneurysm sac vs those with aneurysm sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and to identify the independent risk factors for aneurysm sac regression and mortality after EVAR. METHODS: We reviewed all the patients who had undergone EVAR from 2005 to 2018 with computed tomography angiography available at 1 year of follow-up. Aneurysm sac regression was defined as a diameter decrease of >10%. We used multivariable regression to identify the independent risk factors for sac regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were performed to test the differences in 5-year mortality between a stable sac diameter and sac regression. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 325 patients, with 185 in the sac regression group and 140 in the stable sac group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that treatment of a ruptured aneurysm was an independent risk factor for aneurysm sac regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.96). Age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09), ischemic heart disease (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.13-3.31), neck thrombus (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.07-6.95), and a type II endoleak (HR, 19.21; 95% CI, 7.32-50.40) were independent risk factors for a stable aneurysm sac diameter. Multivariable Cox regression showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for patients with a stable aneurysm sac after EVAR (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.36-3.72). No significant differences were found in cause of death between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A stable aneurysm sac after EVAR was associated with increased mortality. Age, ischemic heart disease, neck thrombus, and a type II endoleak were independent risk factors for a stable aneurysm sac. However, a well-founded explanation for this finding is still lacking. Future research should focus on aggressive treatment of type II endoleaks and inflammatory processes as potential pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Clinical outcomes of tranexamic acid in acute hip hemiarthroplasties in frail geriatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has shown to significantly reduce perioperative blood loss in elective orthopedic joint replacement surgery but is yet not implemented in acute hip fracture surgery for elderly patients who are particularly vulnerable to perioperative blood loss and postoperative anemia. Aim of this study is to answer the following questions: 1. Does TXA reduce bleeding associated complications in elderly patients? 2. Does TXA induce thromboembolic complications in elderly patients? HYPOTHESIS: TXA reduces perioperative blood loss and associated complications in acute hip fracture surgery in geriatric patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational cohort study with prospectively enrolled patients over 65 years of age who received an acute hip hemiarthroplasty, the primary outcome was blood loss, also described as Δ hemoglobin. Secondary outcomes were bleeding associated complications as hematomas. Also, the occurrence of thromboembolic events and mortality were examined. RESULTS: In total 864 geriatric patients were included of which 235 received TXA and 629 did not. Multivariable analysis showed reduced Δ hemoglobin loss [-0.24 (-0.39; -0.09), p=0.002] and hematomas (OR 0.44 (0.21; 0.91), p=0.026). Pulmonary embolism were diagnosed more frequently after administration of TXA (2% versus 0.3%, p=0.008), without an association with increased 30-day mortality rate (6% versus 8%, p=0.3). DISCUSSION: TXA reduced perioperative blood loss and associated complications. However, adverse effects of TXA as pulmonary embolisms were found more frequently without effecting postoperative mortality rates. More research is needed to assess adverse effects of intravenous TXA and topical TXA as an alternative for systemic TXA to prevent systemic adverse effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Observational cohort study.

Renal function after withdrawal of lithium.

OBJECTIVES: Patients on chronic lithium therapy sometimes develop chronic kidney disease. For clinical decision-making, it is important to know whether discontinuation of lithium can lead to improvement of renal function. We studied the trajectory of renal function in a population previously on chronic lithium therapy. METHODS: From a large database of patients on chronic lithium therapy, we selected a group of patients who stopped using lithium and whose creatinine values at least half a year after lithium withdrawal were available. We measured the slope of renal function (eGFR) before and after discontinuation of lithium. We compared the subgroup of patients with improvement of the renal function with those who showed further deterioration of the eGFR. RESULTS: eGFR slope significantly improved after discontinuation of lithium. Of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3 or more (eGFR<60 ml/min), the vast majority showed an increase of eGFR or a decrease in the rate of decline after lithium withdrawal. The group of patients with further deterioration of the renal function had a mean eGFR of 32 ml/min, which was significantly lower than the patients with an improvement of the kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of lithium leads in the majority of patients to improvement in renal function or at least less rapid deterioration.

Drain versus no drain after hip hemi-arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures; differences in clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: The routine use of surgical drains in elective hip arthroplasty has been abandoned. Also in acute hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures drain use reduces. Question is, whether this is justified in geriatric patients, where the incidence of anticoagulation use is high. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with and without the use of a wound drain after hip hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective hip fracture database and completed by retrospective review of the hospital records at two level II trauma centers between January 1st 2010 and May 16th 2016. Patients with a femoral neck fracture requiring hip hemiarthroplasty were included in the study. RESULTS: This study cohort included 900 patients (68% female), with a median age of 83.5 (IQR 78-88), of which 544 (60%) had a wound drain. Patients with a wound drain needed more days to be ready for discharged (10.0 days (SD ± 43.3), P = < 0.001) compared to patients without a drain (5.3 days (SD ± 4.2). With a drain more hemoglobin loss was found, 2.66 g/dL versus 2.4 g/dL (P = 0.008) and also more packed cells were supplemented, 0.29 versus 0.13 (P = 0.0016). Wound drain placement showed a statistically significant inverse relation with post-operative hematoma; odds ratio (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39; 0.94, P = 0.024), but no reduced risk of post-operative deep surgical site infection, (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.43; 2.72, P = 0.862). CONCLUSION: Surgical drain placement was not associated with a reduced risk of post-operative deep surgical site infections, nor one-year mortality. However, a decreased risk of post-operative wound hematoma was observed. Furthermore, patients with a drain needed more days to be ready for discharge, show more hemoglobin loss and need more packed cell supplementation during admission.

Validation of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) in Patients with Hip Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study in the Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was developed to predict 30-day mortality for patients with hip fracture. This study aimed to validate the NHFS in a cohort with sufficient statistical power. METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective hip-fracture database (FAMMI). Patients were included between January 1, 2018 and January 11, 2021. All consecutively admitted patients ≥18 years of age with a hip fracture (ie, femoral neck fracture, intertrochanteric fracture, and subtrochanteric fracture) were included. Mann-Whitney's U values were calculated to find potential miscalibration of the NHFS formula. Discrimination evaluation was performed using the concordance statistic as an equivalent to area under the receiver-operating curve. RESULTS: In total, 2,458 patients were included. Mean age was 80±12 years, and 66% were women (n=1,631). Median NHFS was 5 (4-6) and overall 30-day mortality 7.9% (n=195). Overall goodness of fit was tested with Pearson's ?2 (11.8, df 10; P=0.297). No statistically significant signs of miscalibration were found (Mann-Whitney U, P=0.08). Discrimination was tested with area under the receiver- operating curve, which was 72.1% (95% CI 68.7%-75.4%). However, observed 30-day mortality in our population of hip-fracture patients was slightly higher than the NHFS prediction. CONCLUSION: The NHFS seemed to predict 30-day mortality with reasonable accuracy for patients with a hip fracture in a population within the Netherlands.

Antithrombotics in Patients With a Femoral Neck Fracture: Evaluating Daily Practice in an Observational Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric hip fracture patients are characterized by frailty due to multiple comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, in which the use of antithrombotics is frequent. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of antithrombotics on perioperative care and patient outcomes after hip hemiarthroplasty following current guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational cohort study included all consecutively admitted patients with a femoral neck fracture requiring hip hemiarthroplasty between January 1st 2010, and May 16th 2016, in two level II trauma teaching hospitals. Patients with multiple trauma injuries were excluded. RESULTS: In total, n = 907 patients (68% female (n = 615), median age 84 years) were included of which n = 142 used a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and n = 213 used antiplatelet (AP) therapy. Both were associated with more packed cell supplementation (.4 ± 1.1 units and .3 ± .8 units vs .2 ± .6 units, P < .001 and P = .03, respectively). VKA was associated with more hematomas compared no antithrombotics (23% vs 11%, P = .001). VKA had a longer time to surgery compared to no antithrombotics and AP (24 hours vs 19 and 20 hours, P < .001 and P < .001, respectively) and longer admission duration (9 days vs 7 days P < .001. There were no differences in 30 day mortality nor in 1-year mortality rates. DISCUSSION: All modifiable causes for deep SSI, such as hematomas, should be prevented in acute hip fracture surgery. Since antithrombotics are associated with hematomas, an optimal handling in perioperative setting is necessary. CONCLUSION: VKA was associated with longer time to surgery, more hematomas, and longer admission duration. VKA and AP were associated with more packed cell supplementation.

Validation of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) to predict 30-day mortality in patients with an intracapsular hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was developed to predict 30-day mortality following a fracture of the hip. While the NHFS has been validated in three hip fracture populations within Great Britain, these studies make no distinction between the type of fracture and surgery. Literature 'however' shows an increased risk for mortality after a hemi-arthroplasty following an intra-capsular hip fracture. To verify whether the mortality after an intra-capsular hip fracture is higher compared to the predicted mortality score according to the NHFS, a validation of the NHFS in patients with a hemi-arthroplasty after an intra-capsular hip fracture was performed. METHODS: The NHFS was calculated for consecutive patients presenting with an intra-capsular fracture of the hip in two level II trauma teaching hospitals between 1 January 2011 and 1 May 2016. The observed 30-day mortality was compared with that predicted by the NHFS using several validation statistics. RESULTS: A total of 901 patients were included in the present study. Mean age in the patients was 83 years (SD 8) and 623 (68%) of the patients were female. Almost 60% of the patients had an ASA-score (American Society of Anaesthesiologists [ASA]) of≥3 and overall 30-day mortality was 9.5% (n=86). The median NHFS was 5, and there was no significant change in median NHFS over the past 5 years. The mortality rate in the studied population of hemi-arthroplasty patients was significantly higher than mortality rates predicted by the NHFS (p=0.022, Pearson's Chi-squared test). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that for a patient with a hemi-arthroplasty following an intra-capsular hip fracture, there could be an underestimation for the 30-day mortality rate following the NHFS prediction model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Delirium after hip hemiarthroplasty for proximal femoral fractures in elderly patients: risk factors and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the present study was to verify the potential risk factors for developing a delirium after hip fracture surgery. The secondary aim of this study was to examine the related clinical outcomes after a delirium developed post-hip fracture surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective hip fracture database and completed by retrospective review of the hospital records. A total of 463 patients undergoing hip fracture (hip hemiarthroplasty) surgery in a level II trauma teaching hospital between January 2011 and May 2016 were included. Delirium was measured using the Delirium Observation Screening Scale, the confusion assessment method, and an observatory judgment by geriatric medicine specialists. RESULTS: The results showed that 26% of the patients (n=121) developed a delirium during hospital stay with a median duration during admission of 5 days (IQR 3-7). The multivariable model showed that the development of delirium was significantly explained by dementia (OR 2.75, P=0.001), age (OR 1.06, P=0.005), and an infection during admission (pneumonia, deep surgical site infection, or urinary tract infection) (OR 1.23, P=0.046). After 1 year of follow-up, patients who developed delirium after hip fracture surgery were significantly more discharged to (semi-independent) nursing homes (P<0.001) and had a significantly higher mortality rate (P<0.001) compared to patients without delirium after hip fracture surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that 26% of the patients undergoing hip fracture surgery developed a delirium. The risk factors including age, dementia, and infection during admission significantly predicted the development of the delirium. No association was confirmed between delirium and time of admission or time to surgery. The development of delirium after hip fracture surgery was subsequently found to be a significant predictor of admission to a nursing home and mortality after 1 year.

The minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the traditional anterolateral approach (Watson-Jones) for hip hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: The minimally invasive (MI) anterolateral approach is a relatively new approach for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with a hemiarthroplasty (HA). There is limited research available presenting clinical outcomes after an HA using the MI approach. Therefore the aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes of the MI and traditional anterolateral approaches in patients after HA. METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective hip fracture database and completed by retrospective review of the electronic medical records. Patients undergoing HA in a level II trauma teaching hospital between 1 January 2011 and 1 May 2016 were enrolled. RESULTS: A total of 463 patients (67% female), 223 in the MI group (mean age, 82 ± 7) and 240 (mean age, 81 ± 8) in the traditional anterolateral group were enrolled. No significant difference was found in baseline characteristics. The surgeons experience measured by the operations performed per year was in favour of the MI anterolateral group (26 vs 18, p < 0.001). The median operating time for an MI approach was shorter (53 vs 69 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in mortality rates (p = 0.131) and post-operative complications: haematomas (p = 0.63), dislocations (p = 0.63), deep surgical site infections (p = 0.66) and re-operations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show the MI anterolateral approach has a minimally shorter operation time with no difference in post-operative complications and clinical outcomes. We, therefore, conclude that the MI anterolateral approach is a safe alternative for the traditional anterolateral approach with an improved operation time, a smaller incision and less surrounding tissue damage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III retrospective cohort study.