Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 40(3): 383-7, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27458243

RESUMO

The goal of the present study was to determine whether an active learning/teaching strategy facilitated with mobile technologies can improve students' levels of memory retention of key physiological concepts. We used a quasiexperimental pretest/posttest nonequivalent group design to compare the test performances of second-year medical students (n = 311) taught by conventional didactic methods (traditional group) with those involved in a case-based problem-solving learning approach facilitated with mobile phones as web-based "clickers" (experimental group). Using their cell phones, students answered the same questions about the key physiological concepts three times. A pretest to determine their baseline knowledge was followed by two followup tests after 1 wk and 2 mo, respectively. The experimental group scored a mean of 93.2% correct items after 1 wk and 84.8% correct items after 2 mo [95% confidence intervals: (89.4, 97.0) and (79.4, 90.3), respectively]. Compared with their colleagues in the traditional group who scored 33.3% [95% confidence interval: (18.9, 47.8)] and 38.5% [95% confidence interval: (23.6, 53.4)] correct items, respectively, this was a significant increase of ∼50% (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, for the experimental group, Cohen's effect size (d) values of d = 1.67 (1-wk posttest) and d = 1.38 (2-mo posttest) suggested a very high practical significance. In contrast, in the traditional group, Cohen's d values of d = 0.04 (1-wk posttest) and d = 0.15 (2-mo posttest) assumed a very low practical significance.


Assuntos
Telefone Celular , Instrução por Computador/métodos , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Fisiologia/educação , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas/métodos , Estudantes de Medicina , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Humanos
2.
Lijec Vjesn ; 116(3-4): 102-5, 1994.
Artigo em Servo-Croata (Latino) | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8057736

RESUMO

In this paper a review as well as some of our results concerning the use of hyperthermia in the treatment of tumors are presented. Basically there are two broad categories of hyperthermia: systemic and localized. Local hyperthermia used as an adjunct to standard treatments (surgical therapy, radiation therapy, chemotherapy) as well as immunotherapy has gained more application in the experimental studies of thermotherapy in the clinic. Heat kills cells in a predictable and repeatable way, however, many of basic mechanisms relating to cell killing are still poorly understood. Despite that the intrinsic thermal sensitivity of tumor cells are identical to that of normal cells the difference in thermal sensitivity arises between tumor and normal tissue due to environmental and pathophysiological differences. The application of hyperthermia in multimodal tumor therapy has a strong biological rationale because using hyperthermia as an adjuvant to other therapies complementary and synergistic cytotoxic effects can be achieved leading to a significant improvement of the efficacy of tumor therapy. So did the combined treatment of local hyperthermia and immunotherapy show a synergistic effect due to enhancement of NK activity. However, the administration of some chemotherapeutics can abolish the observed synergism indicating that the use of a combined therapy in clinics should be attempted cautiously.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/terapia , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...