Evaluation of abdominal computed tomography findings in patients with COVID-19: a multicenter study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of abdominal computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and interrogate the relationship between abdominal CT findings and patient demographic features, clinical findings, and laboratory test results as well as the CT atherosclerosis score in the abdominal aorta. METHODS: This study was designed as a multicenter retrospective study. The abdominal CT findings of 1.181 patients with positive abdominal symptoms from 26 tertiary medical centers with a positive polymerase chain-reaction test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 were reviewed. The frequency of ischemic and non-ischemic CT findings as well as the association between CT findings, clinical features, and abdominal aortic calcific atherosclerosis score (AA-CAS) were recorded. RESULTS: Ischemic and non-ischemic abdominal CT findings were detected in 240 (20.3%) and 328 (27.7%) patients, respectively. In 147 patients (12.4%), intra-abdominal malignancy was present. The most frequent ischemic abdominal CT findings were bowel wall thickening (n = 120; 10.2%) and perivascular infiltration (n = 40; 3.4%). As for non-ischemic findings, colitis (n = 91; 7.7%) and small bowel inflammation (n = 73; 6.2%) constituted the most frequent disease processes. The duration of hospital stay was found to be higher in patients with abdominal CT findings than in patients without any positive findings (13.8 ± 13 vs. 10.4 ± 12.8 days, P < 0.001). The frequency of abdominal CT findings was significantly higher in patients who did not survive the infection than in patients who were discharged after recovery (41.7% vs. 27.4%, P < 0.001). Increased AA-CAS was found to be associated with a higher risk of ischemic conditions in abdominal CT examinations. CONCLUSION: Abdominal symptoms in patients with COVID-19 are usually associated with positive CT findings. The presence of ischemic findings on CT correlates with poor COVID-19 outcomes. A high AA-CAS is associated with abdominal ischemic findings in patients with COVID-19.

Elastography and Doppler May Bring a New Perspective to TIRADS, Altering Conventional Ultrasonography Dominance.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The main aim of ultrasonography (US) examining thyroid nodules is to differentiate malignant nodules from benign nodules. Several professional societies and groups of investigators have defined guidelines such as Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) to provide the standardized language and approach to thyroid nodules. This study is aimed to investigate the compatibility of such classification systems with the pathological diagnosis of nodules and evaluate the contribution of the Shear-wave elastography (SWE) and Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study. Patients with thyroid US exams between December 2017 and April 2019 were included. In the study, eligible 210 nodules from 210 patients were enrolled. For stratification, the conventional B-mode US, SWE and DUS were performed. According to Kwak, American College of Radiology (ACR), and European (EU)-TIRADS, Nodules were classified separately, and a new scoring system whose the criteria was put defined in the study has developed. RESULTS: For SWE; Emean cut-off value was 33 kPa with a sensitivity and specificity of 95,6% (95% CI: 0,85-0,98) and 95% (95% CI:0,90-0,97) respectively (p <0.001). For spectral DUS; resistivity index (RI) cut-off value was 0.64 with a sensitivity and specificity of 73,3% (95% CI:0,59-0,83) and 80% (95% CI:0,73-0,85) respectively (p <0.001). Kwak TIRADS, American College of Radiology TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, and new system were compared by ROC curve analysis. The new system has the highest sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and AUC compared to others. CONCLUSIONS: The new scoring system has shown that SWE and DUS findings may alter the categorization in TIRADS and increase sensitivity and specificity.