Contact precautions: more is not necessarily better.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether increases in contact isolation precautions are associated with decreased adherence to isolation practices among healthcare workers (HCWs). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from February 2009 to October 2009. SETTING: Eleven teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: HCWs. METHODS: One thousand thirteen observations conducted on HCWs. Additional data included the number of persons in isolation, types of HCWs, and hospital-specific contact precaution practices. Main outcome measures included compliance with individual components of contact isolation precautions (hand hygiene before and after patient encounter, donning of gown and glove upon entering a patient room, and doffing upon exiting) and overall compliance (all 5 measures together) during varying burdens of isolation. RESULTS: Compliance with hand hygiene was as follows: prior to donning gowns/gloves, 37.2%; gowning, 74.3%; gloving, 80.1%; doffing of gowns/gloves, 80.1%; after gown/glove removal, 61%. Compliance with all components was 28.9%. As the burden of isolation increased (20% or less to greater than 60%), a decrease in compliance with hand hygiene (43.6%-4.9%) and with all 5 components (31.5%-6.5%) was observed. In multivariable analysis, there was an increase in noncompliance with all 5 components of the contact isolation precautions bundle (odds ratio [OR], 6.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-37.44]; P = .03) and in noncompliance with hand hygiene prior to donning gowns and gloves (OR, 10.1 [95% CI, 1.84-55.54]; P = .008) associated with increasing burden of isolation. CONCLUSIONS: As the proportion of patients in contact isolation increases, compliance with contact isolation precautions decreases. Placing 40% of patients under contact precautions represents a tipping point for noncompliance with contact isolation precautions measures.

Pharmacokinetics and monte carlo simulations of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Doripenem is a group 2 carbapenem with enhanced in vitro activity against gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There is a paucity of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data on doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 doses of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia and provide probability estimates of attaining effective drug exposure against common gram-negative pathogens. METHODS: We obtained multiple blood samples from 12 adults with febrile neutropenia who were receiving either 500 mg or 1000 mg of intravenous doripenem over 4 hours every 8 hours. Following at least 2 doses, serum concentrations were measured in each subject at 1, 4, 6, and 8 hours after initiation of a dose by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The derived pharmacokinetic parameters from these serum levels were used to perform a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation against bacteria with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.008-64 mg/L to determine probability estimates of the time in which unbound drug concentrations remain above the MIC (fT(>MIC)). RESULTS: The mean pharmacokinetic parameters in these patients were a volume of distribution of 43.9 L, an elimination rate constant of 0.37 h(-1), a total clearance of 14.4 L/h, and an area under the concentration-time curve of 57.6 mg•h/L. An optimal probability of target attainment (40% fT(>MIC)) of 90% was obtained against bacteria with MICs ≤2 mg/L and ≤4 mg/L with 500-mg and 1000-mg doses, respectively. Adverse events associated with doripenem were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this analysis of doripenem suggest that higher doses, as well as prolonged infusions, may be necessary to optimally treat selected gram-negative bacteria (eg, P. aeruginosa) in patients with febrile neutropenia.