RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence diagnostics with two different wide field-of-view imaging systems with fluorescence excitation at 405 nm and 635 nm, respectively, were compared. Both systems include fluorescence quantification and experimental geometry normalization algorithms. METHODS: A newly developed system with an excitation wavelength of 405 nm was tested on intralipid fluorescent tumor phantoms with chlorin-e6. Both, this new system and a second existing system with an excitation wavelength of 635 nm, were used for fluorescent diagnosis in six patients with basal cell carcinoma and cancer of the oral mucosa. For PDT, a red diode laser with a wavelength of 660 nm was used for all 6 patients. One patient received an additional irradiation using the red LED source of the new system RESULTS: The boundaries of the lesions and the fluorescence intensity were successfully determined by both video systems. CONCLUSIONS: Both fluorescence imaging approaches showed comparable contrast between diseased and healthy tissues. For oral mucosal cancer, a system with violet fluorescence excitation, bispectral frame analysis, and time-resolved background suppression showed better contrast between the tumor and normal tissue and effective elimination of autofluorescence. Moreover, both systems provided efficient quantification of fluorescence and gave fluorescence indices that were weakly dependent on the distance between the device and the tissue.
