Outcomes After Chevron Osteotomy with and Without Additional Akin Osteotomy: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background: Chevron osteotomy is one of the most common approaches to hallux valgus corrective surgery. This procedure is often combined with Akin osteotomy of the proximal phalanx of the hallux. There are no definitive guidelines specifying the indications for a given osteotomy technique nor data on postoperative loss of correction or the effect of the type of first-ray surgery on the development of adjacent-joint arthritis. The aim of this study was to assess radiographic treatment outcomes via chevron osteotomy with and without Akin osteotomy. Methods: The study evaluated 117 patients treated in the period 2016-2019. Ninety-nine of those patients underwent distal chevron osteotomy alone, and 18 patients underwent a combined chevron-Akin double osteotomy. The analyzed radiograms had been obtained preoperatively, at 6 weeks after surgery, and after a long-term follow-up. The following parameters were assessed: the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), interphalangeal angle (IPA), postoperative recurrence of valgus deformity, adjacent-joint arthritis, and complications. Results: Chevron-Akin osteotomy helped maintain lower HVA and IPA values in long-term follow-up in comparison with those in the patients who underwent chevron osteotomy alone. The chevron osteotomy group showed a significant increase in the mean HVA from 18.37° at the first follow-up visit to 20.81° at the last follow-up visit. There were no differences between the groups in terms of the remaining assessed radiographic parameters. Hallux valgus surgery does not increase adjacent-joint arthritis. Conclusion: The use of combined chevron-Akin osteotomy does not affect HVA or IMA correction. The combination of chevron and Akin osteotomies reduces the risk of increased HVA and IPA in long-term follow-up. The additional Akin osteotomy does not increase the risk of adjacent-joint arthritis. Combining chevron osteotomy with Akin osteotomy is recommended in hallux valgus deformity correction.

Radiographic Outcomes of Hallux Valgus Deformity Correction With Chevron and Scarf Osteotomies.

There is no gold standard in the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. The purpose of our study was to compare various aspects of radiographic assessment following scarf and chevron osteotomies and try to determine which technique helps achieve a more pronounced intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA) correction and produces lower rates of complications, including adjacent-joint arthritis. This study included patients who underwent hallux valgus correction with the scarf (n = 32) or chevron (n = 181) method with a follow-up period of over 3 years. We evaluated the following parameters: HVA, IMA, duration of hospital stay, complications, development of adjacent-joint arthritis. The scarf technique helped achieve a mean HVA and IMA correction of 18.3° and 3.6°, respectively, and the chevron technique helped achieve a mean correction of 13.1° and 3.7°, respectively. The achieved deformity correction in terms of both the HVA and IMA was statistically significant in both patient groups. The loss of correction assessed with the HVA was statistically significant only in the chevron group. Neither group showed a statistically significant loss of IMA correction. The duration of hospital stay, reoperation rates, and fixation instability rates were comparable in the 2 groups. Neither of the evaluated methods caused a significant increase in total arthritis scores in the evaluated joints. Our study showed good outcomes of hallux valgus deformity correction in both evaluated groups; however, scarf osteotomy yielded somewhat better radiographic outcomes in HVA correction and no loss of HVA correction at 3.5 years of follow-up.

Kinematic Parameters Following Pilon Fracture Treatment with the Ilizarov Method.

Background: The purpose of our study was to analyze kinematic parameters following pilon fracture treatment with the Ilizarov method. Methods: Our study assessed kinematic parameters of gait in 23 patients with pilon fractures treated with the Ilizarov method. Patients had completed their treatment 24−48 months prior to measurements. The range-of-motion values in the non-operated limb (NOL) and operated limb (OL) were compared. Kinematic parameters were measured using the Noraxon MyoMOTION System. Results: We observed no significant differences in hip flexion, hip abduction, or knee flection between the OLs and NOLs in patients after treatment with the Ilizarov method. We observed significant differences in the ranges of ankle dorsiflexion, inversion, and abduction (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.003, respectively) between the OLs and the NOLs. Conclusion: Following pilon fracture treatment with the Ilizarov method, we observed no differences in terms of knee or hip joint mobility between the OL and the NOL, whereas the range of motion in the ankle joint of the OL was significantly limited. The treatment of pilon fractures with the Ilizarov method does not ensure the complete normalization of ankle joint kinematic parameters. Therefore, intense personalized rehabilitation of the ankle joint is recommended.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on foot surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal dysfunction due to deformities and injuries of the foot is a common orthopedic problem. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on both elective and emergency foot surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study analyzed the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective and emergency foot surgeries. The comparison included data collected in 2019 (March 15-October 15, when the epidemic did not influence the Polish healthcare system or patient demographics) and in a corresponding period in 2020. This study was conducted in the trauma and orthopedic surgery wards and the emergency departments of 2 regional Polish hospitals. RESULTS: The analysis of the data from the orthopedic wards showed a reduction in the total number of admissions in 2020 by 55%. The number of elective and emergency interventions was differently related to the pandemic, with elective interventions declining by 72% and emergency interventions increasing by 27% in 2020 compared to 2019. The total number of elective foot surgeries in children decreased by 59% in 2020. The mean duration of hospital stay was approx. 2.5 days shorter in adults and 1.7 days shorter in children during the 2nd evaluation period. The emergency department data showed a decline of 32% in the number of patients presenting with injuries during the pandemic. Nonetheless, the pandemic did not affect the mean age of patients and the female-to-male ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The global COVID-19 pandemic affected the epidemiology of foot injuries as well as the prevalence of foot surgeries in children and adults.