Reconstruction of the orbitozygomatic framework: State of the art and perspectives.

The reconstruction of the whole orbitozygomatic framework (OZF) is complex and can be encountered in cases of congenital midface deformity, after tumor ablative surgery and in severe facial trauma. Nowadays, surgeon has a wide range of available techniques that have continually grown over the past years, optimizing the surgical management and the aesthetical outcomes. Among them, the autologous bone graft (ABG) remains one of the most suitable options : ABG is easy to harvest and has optimal biological properties for bone healing. It can be tailored to the patient anatomy thanks to the recent advances in computer-assisted surgery. However, substantial drawbacks remain such as the early resorption of the non-vascularized graft, the need of a donor site and its potential morbidity. Alloplastic reconstruction is another option that can resolve both the resorption issue and the donor site morbidity. Moreover, the 3D-printing technologies also allows the manufacturing of patient specific implants. However, alloplastic materials have a variable success, especially due to the high risk of infection or exposure. Consequently, regenerative medicine is a promising field that aims to find a procedure without the disadvantages of ABG or alloplastic based reconstructions, but displaying similar or even higher success rate. Indeed, recent tissue engineering strategies have demonstrated encouraging results for bone regeneration using natural or synthetic biomaterials, patient cells and synthetic bioactive substances. The objective of this review is to present the etiologies of OZF defect, the available reconstruction procedures as well as the current state of the research.

Surgical Management of Hypertelorism: The 3D Animated Technical Note.

The hypertelorism surgery is a complex procedure requiring a long learning curve. Even though the box osteotomy technique is well described in literature, its representation is generally based on texts and illustrations that do not really give a 3-dimensional or a dynamic point of views. The authors present a 3-dimensional animated video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SCS/E561 showing the craniofacial osteotomies and focusing on the critical points to correct hypertelorism.

Computer-Assisted Frontofacial Monobloc Advancement and Facial Bipartition for Pfeiffer Syndrome: Surgical Technique.

BACKGROUND: In patients with Pfeiffer syndrome, several corrections are required to correct facial retrusion, maxillary deficiency, or even hypertelorism. The frontofacial monobloc advancement (FFMA) and the facial bipartition (FB) are the gold standard surgeries. We present the correction of this deformity using a simultaneous computer-assisted FFMA and FB. METHODS: The 3-dimensional surgical planning defined the virtual correction and bone-cutting guide in view of the FFMA and FB. Coronal and intraoral approaches were combined to perform the osteotomies. Four internal distractors were also placed for the postoperative distraction osteogenesis. RESULTS: We reported 2 cases of computer-assisted surgery with satisfying outcomes. The sagittal deficiency (fronto-facial retrusion) was corrected by FFMA and the transversal abnormality (i.e., hypertelorism and maxillary deficiency) by the FB, then followed by an internal distraction osteogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted surgery is helpful and a reliable option for the management of complex faciocraniosynostosis such as hypertelorism and frontofacial retrusion.

Management of post enucleation socket syndrome patients - A retrospective study.

The aim of this retrospective monocentric study was to report the outcomes following the correction of post enucleation socket syndrome (PESS) as well as the factors predicting for a multistep management. Patients were included, if they had received surgery to manage PESS. Demographics and patient history were collected. The symptoms of PESS were clinically rated by the same surgeon and ocularist, preoperatively and after each procedure. The surgery was considered as successful when no PESS clinical symptoms were observed. A prognostic study was performed to investigate the surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included and eight of them had their PESS corrected after the first surgery. In the multivariate analysis (MVA), the deep upper lid sulcus symptom remained the main significant factor associated with an incomplete correction after the first surgery (OR 45.5, IC 95% (3.481-594.6), p = 0.004). For further corrections, the ptosis was the only significant prognostic factor requiring several surgeries (p = 0.005). At the end of the management, 94.4% of the patients had satisfying outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The management of a PESS involves the correction of both the orbital cavity and the soft tissues. Although its correction is complex and time consuming in the majority of cases, the patients should be informed that the final cosmetic outcomes remain good at the expense of several surgeries.

How Accurate Is Computer-Assisted Orbital Hypertelorism Surgery? Comparison of the Three-Dimensional Surgical Planning with the Postoperative Outcomes.

Importance: Surgery of orbital hypertelorism (ORH) remains an imprecise surgical procedure depending on the experience and habits of the craniofacial surgical teams. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has developed dramatically in craniofacial surgery, but there is no current study assessing its accuracy for ORH surgery. Objective: This study aimed to assess the input of CAS and especially the accuracy of the cutting guide-based procedures. The authors presented the computer-assisted box osteotomy or facial bipartition techniques and compared the preoperative surgical planning with the postoperative results. Design, Setting, and Participants: A monocentric retrospective study included the patients who underwent surgical correction of ORH from 2016 to 2019 at the University Hospital Center of Tours, France. All the patients had a computer-assisted orbital hypertelorism surgery (CAOHS) using cutting guides and tailored fixation plates. Of 10 patients included, 7 were treated by box osteotomies and 3 by facial bipartitions. Intervention: Each patient had a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan enabling a virtual simulation of the reconstruction and the manufacturing of patient-specific cutting guides and customized osteosynthesis plates. The postoperative CT scans were compared with the three-dimensional (3D) virtual simulation using the distances between the sagittal plane and orbital and infraorbital reference points, and from the measurement of the orbital advancement (i.e., 10 reference measurements). Results: All patients had satisfactory clinical and aesthetical outcomes with a mean interorbital distance of 22.8 ± 2.8 mm. The postoperative measurements were significantly higher than for the surgical planning (p < 0.0001). The average absolute differences between the 3D virtual planning and the postoperative CT scans were <1.30, 1.90, and 0.80 mm for the orbital, infraorbital, and orbital advancement measurements, respectively. The overall accuracy of the CAOHS (root mean square deviation) was 1.39 mm. Conclusions: The use of computer-assisted design and computer-aided manufacturing device, such as cutting guides and tailored plates, facilitates the bony surgical correction of ORH using box osteotomy or facial bipartition and allows for valuable, reproducible, and satisfactory clinical outcomes.