TMJ symptoms reduce chewing amplitude and velocity, and increase variability.

OBJECTIVE: The null hypothesis was that mandibular amplitude, velocity, and variability during gum chewing are not altered in subjects with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements (ID). METHODS: Thirty symptomatic subjects with confirmed ID consented to chew gum on their left and right sides while being tracked by an incisor-point jaw tracker. A gender and age matched control group (p > 0.67) volunteered to be likewise recorded. Student's t-test compared the ID group's mean values to the control group. RESULTS: The control group opened wider (p < 0.05) and chewed faster (p < 0.05) than the ID group. The mean cycle time of the ID group (0.929 s) was longer than the control group (0.751 s; p < 0.05) and more variable (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: The ID group exhibited reduced amplitude and velocity but increased variability during chewing. The null hypothesis was rejected. Further study of adaptation to ID by patients should be pursued.

Comparison of TMJ vibration frequencies under different joint conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 10 Hz wide segments of the 0 to 1000 Hz frequency distributions of vibrations recorded from five stages of internally deranged and asymptomatic temporomandibular joints (TMJs). METHODS: TMJ vibrations were recorded from 236 patients with five stages of TMJ dysfunction: (1) reducing partial disc displacement (PDDR, n=39); (2) acute reducing complete disc displacement (A-DDR, n=39); (3) chronic reducing complete disc displacement (C-DDR, n=55); (4) un-adapted, non-reducing, complete disc displacement (DDUA, n=57); and (5) well adapted, non-reducing, complete disc displacement (DDWA, n=46). A totally asymptomatic control group with quiet TMJs (AQ, n=43) and a group with vibrating TMJs (AWV, n=93), but otherwise asymptomatic were also recorded. Frequency distributions were calculated for each group using discrete Fourier transform methods in 10 Hz increments (0-10 Hz, 10-20 Hz,…, 990-1000 Hz). The 10 Hz segments were compared between the seven groups using Student's t test with Bonferroni adjustment. RESULTS: There were significant differences (P<0.05) in all 21 comparisons for the three segments between 80 Hz and 110 Hz, in 20 of 21 comparisons between 180 and 200 Hz, in 19 of 21 comparisons between 110 and 180 Hz and between 50 and 80 Hz. DISCUSSION: The segments of the frequency distributions from 80 to 110 Hz provided the best differentiation between all seven groups.

Chewing movements altered in the presence of temporomandibular joint internal derangements.

AIMS: The objectives were to find specific factors that are mathematically distinct between the chewing timings, movement pattern shapes, variability, and movement velocities of: (1) normal asymptomatic subjects and (2) a group of subjects with verified temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements. METHODOLOGY: Left- and right-sided chewing movement recordings of 28 subjects (34.5 ± 14.0 years) were randomly selected from a large database of patients exhibiting verified unilateral or bilateral TMJ internal derangements. The chewing movements of an age- and gender-matched control group of 20 asymptomatic subjects (32.5 ± 11.6 years, P>0.60) with verified normal TMJ function were also recorded. Means and standard deviations of the opening, closing, turning point, terminal chewing position, and velocity patterns were calculated. A two-tailed Student's t-test with unequal variances was used to compare the parameters between the two groups (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: The dysfunctional group functioned significantly slower and with greater variability than the control group. The vertical dimension was consistently smaller in the dysfunctional group (P<0.00001). The terminal chewing position was significantly less precise in the dysfunctional group (vertical: P<0.002 and lateral: P<0.037). The maximum lateral width was significantly less (P<0.0071), and the peak and the average velocities were significantly lower (P<0.00001 for both) in the dysfunctional group. CONCLUSIONS: This group of dysfunctional subjects exhibited significantly slower, smaller, and more variable chewing patterns than the control group. The functional pattern of mastication appears to be significantly altered in the presence of an internal derangement of the TMJ.

Distribution of temporomandibular joint vibration transfer to the opposite side.

A vibration produced when a displaced temporomandibular disc reduces during opening can transfer some of its energy from the ipsilateral joint to the contralateral joint. The objective of this study was to measure what percentage of the ipsilateral vibration is transferred to the contralateral joint. The study included the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) vibrations of 144 (informed consent) subjects, (113 F, 31 M), with reducing displaced discs (DDR). Vibrations from 165 joints were recorded bilaterally with BioJVA (BioResearch Associates, Inc. Milwaukee, WI). In each case, any contralateral vibration was analyzed to verify that it was caused by the ipsilateral joint. The contralateral amplitude was divided by the ipsilateral amplitude and multiplied by 100 to produce a percentage of transfer. The percentage values (0-100%) were used to create a Relative Frequency Histogram with 20 classes (1-5%, 6-10%, 11-15%, etc.). The Relative Frequency Histogram graph revealed a three-mounded distribution of the percentage of transfer. One mound fell between 5 and 34 percent, one between 35 and 69 percent and the third between 70 and 98 percent. The appearance of a three-mounded distribution suggests that there may be three different failure modes leading to TMJ intemal derangements. Alternatively, it may be that failure of the disc's stabilizing ligaments leads to three different internal derangement conditions that are in some way distinct. The evidence of apparent tri-modality in this vibration data distribution suggests that there may be three different failure modes of disc displacement with reduction (e.g., anterior, anteromedial, and medio-lateral disc displacement). If so, identifying them could allow for a more detailed description of DDR. Therefore, further investigation of this 'tri-modal' distribution should be undertaken.

Artificial neural network learns to differentiate normal TMJs and nonreducing displaced disks after training on incisor-point chewing movements.

Previous authors have described four frontal gum-chewing patterns associated with normal and abnormal TMJ disk-condyle relationships. The objective of this study was to create an automatic detection capability (expert system) by training an artificial neural network to recognize nonreducing displaced disks from frontal chewing data. Sixty-eight (68) subjects, 29 with normal joints, 18 with unilateral nonreducing displaced disks and 21 with bilateral nonreducing displaced disks were selected from a continuous series of patients seeking treatment for TMD. Right-sided gum chewing was recorded from all patients. Left-sided chewing was also recorded from the right unilateral patients. 50% of the vertical, lateral and timing values at 10%, 65% and 100% of opening and at 30%, 70% and 90% of closing were used to train an artificial neural network. The remaining 50% were used for testing. All normal subjects were detected as normal (specificity = 100%). Two bilateral and two unilateral patients were not detected (sensitivity = 91.8%). Four (4) patients received the wrong classification (unilateral vs. bilateral) and one patient received both (undecided) for an overall accuracy = 86.8%. The artificial neural network detected, at an acceptable level of error, the presence and type of nonreducing disk displacement from frontal plane jaw recordings of gum chewing in a group of real patients seeking treatment for TMD. Since it is very inexpensive to conduct, mastication analysis appears to have the potential of an excellent cost/benefit ratio.