In vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacoeconomics of ceftriaxone compared with third and fourth generation cephalosporins: review.

Due to their wide spectrum of activity, good pharmacokinetics, established clinical efficacy and high tolerability, cephalosporins are among the most widely used antibiotics worldwide. The third and fourth generation cephalosporins are predominantly parenteral agents, administered two or three times daily, used in the treatment of a wide range of moderate to severe infections. Ceftriaxone, a third generation cephalosporin, is unique in exhibiting an unusually long elimination half-life that allows for once-daily administration. Among third generation cephalosporins, ceftazidime and cefoperazone are unusual among cephalosporins in possessing activity, albeit moderate, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, both of these agents also exhibit marked loss of activity against Gram-negative organisms producing high levels of Class A or C beta-lactamases. Sulperazone, a 1:1 combination of cefoperazone and the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam, is more resistant to attack by Class A beta-lactamases but remains vulnerable to isolates producing Class C beta-lactamases. Ceftriaxone exhibits the widest antibacterial spectrum of third generation cephalosporins and this is reflected in clinical responses. Cefoperazone and sulperazone exhibit the poorest clinical responses. Although the fourth generation cephalosporins cefpirome and cefepime exhibit enhanced stability to bacterial beta-lactamases and marginally enhanced in vitro antibacterial activity over ceftriaxone, there is no clinical advantage in terms of clinical or bacteriological success. The cephalosporins are well tolerated, with few and generally transient adverse effects; the major exception being haematological abnormalities including blood coagulation disorders associated with cefoperazone. Several pharmacoeconomic studies indicate that the once-daily dosing regimen required for ceftriaxone is the major factor responsible for its cost-effectiveness over third and fourth generation cephalosporins.

Delayed progression to AIDS in volunteers treated with long-term HIV-1 Immunogen (REMUNE) therapy in Thailand.

OBJECTIVES: To observe the long-term effects of an immune-based therapy HIV-1 Immunogen (REMUNE; Immune Response Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA) as a first course of treatment designed to sustain the immune system and thus delay the initiation of therapy with antiretroviral drugs and/or delay disease progression. METHODS: In this open-label, multi-institute extended phase II P2101B study, disease progression, CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, HIV-1 RNA levels, and genotypic antiretroviral drug resistance were examined in 223 asymptomatic HIV-1-infected Thai volunteers receiving REMUNE every 12 weeks over 132 weeks. A subset of subjects was randomly selected by the physicians to receive antiretroviral drugs for 10 months. RESULTS: Patients treated with REMUNE demonstrated a low rate of clinical disease progression (0.72 per 100 person-years), higher CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, higher body weight before and after treatment in the same patient, and stable viral load with no serious adverse events. We found no genotypic evidence of drug resistance in subgroups of patients on REMUNE monotherapy or REMUNE plus antiretrovirals (ARTs). CONCLUSIONS: This Thai study, like previous US and European studies, confirms that therapeutic immunization of HIV-infected volunteers modifies disease progression, as evidenced by stabilization of CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, body weight, and viral load. As the majority of asymptomatic patients demonstrated an objective response to immunization, this study suggests that REMUNE may be utilized prior to initiation of antiviral drug therapy when CD4 cell counts are still above the current ART guidelines. Further work should be carried out to examine its potential use in combination with ART in order to reduce the increasingly common occurrence of drug resistance.

Long-term follow-up of HIV-1-infected Thai patients immunized with Remune monotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this 2-year follow-up study was to investigate the long-term effect of Remune as monotherapy for HIV-1 infection. BACKGROUND: Participants previously enrolled in the phase II double-blind, randomized, adjuvant-controlled study of the HIV-1 Immunogen (Remune) were followed for 2 years. Open-label immunization with Remune monotherapy was given to each participant every 12 weeks. Remune, a gp 120-depleted HIV-1 that was inactivated in beta-propiolactone and irradiation, was emulsified with mineral oil (incomplete Freund's adjuvant). METHOD: In Study 2101B, the effect of four doses of Remune given every 12 weeks over 40 weeks was compared to placebo in 297 asymptomatic type E HIV-infected patients [Churdboonchart et al., 2000]. A group of 17 volunteers were separated into a subset study and another 57 were excluded from analysis due to discontinuation or addition of other treatments. This 2-year follow-up study continued with open-label dosing of HIV-1 Immunogen every 12 weeks for the remaining 223 patients. Changes in CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells, and body weight were monitored at each patient visit. RESULTS: Overall, immunizations were safe; common adverse events were tolerable injection site reactions. CD4+ T-cell counts remained stable over the 132-week observation period for this cohort with a slight increase of 36.01 cells/microL. CD8+ T-cell counts showed an increase from baseline during the follow-up period (415.21 cells/microL). Furthermore, we also observed an increase in body weight from baseline (1.08 kg) at week 132. In addition, baseline CD4 count appeared to predict CD4 count at week 132 (slope = 0.31, p <.0001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that long-term treatment of HIV-1 infection with Remune monotherapy is safe and results in a stabilization of CD4+ counts. Furthermore, it is likely that HIV-1 therapeutic immunization may show its greatest clinical benefit in participants with higher CD4+ cell counts. Such an approach may have important ramifications in developing countries where access to antiviral drugs is limited and also in early chronic HIV-1 infection when CD4+ cells are still over 300 cells/microL in order to limit the cost and toxicity.

A double-blind, adjuvant-controlled trial of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) immunogen (Remune) monotherapy in asymptomatic, HIV-1-infected thai subjects with CD4-cell counts of >300.

We examined the effect of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific immune-based therapy in Thailand, where access to antiviral drug therapy is limited. A 40-week trial was conducted with 297 asymptomatic, HIV-infected Thai subjects with CD4-cell counts greater than 300 microl/mm(3). Subjects were randomized to receive either HIV type 1 (HIV-1) immunogen (Remune; inactivated HIV-1 from which gp120 is depleted in incomplete Freund's adjuvant or adjuvant control at 0, 12, 24, and 36 weeks at five different clinical sites in Thailand. Neither group received antiviral drug therapy. The a priori primary endpoint for the trial was changes in CD4-cell counts with secondary parameters of percent changes in CD8-cell counts (percent CD4, CD8, and CD4/CD8) and body weight. Subsets of subjects were also examined for changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, Western blot immunoreactivity, and HIV-1 delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test reactivity. There was a significant difference in changes in CD4-cell counts that favored the HIV-1 immunogen-treated group compared to those for the adjuvant-treated control group (P<0.05). On average, for HIV-1 immunogen-treated subjects CD4-cell counts increased by 84 cells by week 40, whereas the increase for the control group was 38 cells by week 40. This increase in CD4-cell count was associated with increased HIV-specific immunogenicity, as shown by Western blotting and enhanced HIV-1 DTH skin reactivity. No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the groups. The results of this trial suggest that HIV-1 immunogen is safe and significantly increases CD4-cell counts and HIV-specific immunity compared to those achieved with the adjuvant control in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected subjects not taking antiviral drugs.

Seroprevalence of human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) in countries of Southeast Asia compared to the USA, the Caribbean and Africa.

Seroprevalence of HHV-8 has been studied in Malaysia, India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Trinidad, Jamaica and the USA, in both healthy individuals and those infected with HIV. Seroprevalence was found to be low in these countries in both the healthy and the HIV-infected populations. This correlates with the fact that hardly any AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma has been reported in these countries. In contrast, the African countries of Ghana, Uganda and Zambia showed high seroprevalences in both healthy and HIV-infected populations. This suggests that human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8) may be either a recently introduced virus or one that has extremely low infectivity. Nasopharyngeal and oral carcinoma patients from Malaysia, Hong Kong and Sri Lanka who have very high EBV titres show that only 3/82 (3.7%) have antibody to HHV-8, demonstrating that there is little, if any, cross-reactivity between antibodies to these two gamma viruses.

Seroprevalence of human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) in countries of Southeast Asia compared to the USA, the Caribbean and Africa

Seroprevalence of HHV-8 has been studied in Malaysia, India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Trinidad, Jamaica and the USA, in both healthy individuals and those infected with HIV. Seroprevalence was found to be low in these countries. In contrast, the African countries of Ghana, Uganda and Zambia showed high seroprevalences in both healthy and HIV-infected populations. This suggests that human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8) may be either a recently introduced virus or one that has extremely low infectivity. Nasopharyngeal and oral carcinoma patients from Malaysia, Hong Kong and Sri Lanka who have very high EBV titres to show that only 3/82 (3.7 percent) have antibody to HHV-8, demonstrating that there is little, if any, cross-relativity between antibodies to these two gamma viruses. (AU)

Efficacy and safety of twice daily administration of cefpirome in the empiric treatment of sepsis.

Cefpirome is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with good activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. A multicentre trial was performed to study the efficacy and safety of cefpirome 2 g twice daily in the treatment of sepsis. Sixty-three cases were recruited from 10 hospitals from April 1996 to January 1998. Fifty seven cases could be evaluated according to the protocol. The APACHE II score was used to measure severity of illness, with 46.9 per cent of patients having APACHE II score more than 10 and two patients more than 20; both were cured. The most common pathogens were gram-negative bacteria with E. coli predominating 16/40 (40.0%), followed by Klebsiella 8/40 (20.0%). The overall clinical success rates were 54 out of 57 patients (94.7%). In patients with positive blood culture, the clinical cures were achieved for 20/22 (90.9%). Cefpirome showed good efficacy and safety in the empirical treatment of suspected bacteremia or sepsis.