RESUMO
Hemisection refers to sectioning of a mandibular molar into two halves followed by removal of the diseased root and its coronal portion. Hemisection of a mandibular molar may be a suitable treatment option when the decay is restricted to one root and the other root is healthy. The retained root is endodontically treated and the furcation area is made self-cleansable. Retained tooth structure is restored as premolar which helps to reduce the masticatory load. Hemisection of mandibular molar was often referred to as premolarization. Studies showed that the remaining coronal structure influenced the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary first premolars. Clinical experience showed the viability of tunnel restoration as an alternative to class II conventional cavity preparation in initial proximal lesion. This article discusses a case that presents the novel technique involved in restoration of the remaining hemisected tooth using modified tunnel restoration.
RESUMO
This case report describes the Revascularization of a Permanent Immature Mandibular Premolar with Pulp Necrosis and apical periodontitis. Access opening was done & the canal was disinfected with copious irrigation using 2.5% NaOCl and triple antibiotic paste (Ciprofloxacin, Metronidazole, and Minocycline) as intracanal medicament. After the disinfection protocol is complete, it is followed by revascularization procedure. The apex was mechanically irritated to initiate bleeding into the canal to produce a blood clot to the level just below the level of cementoenamel junction. Mineral trioxide aggregate was placed over the blood clot followed by bonded resin restoration above it. After one year follow up; the patient was asymptomatic, no sinus tract was evident. Apical periodontitis was resolved, and there was radiographic evidence of continuing thickness of dentinal walls.
RESUMO
AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability, pH & viscosity of Zinc oxide eugenol sealer mixed with different antibiotics (Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin, Clindamycin and Doxycycline). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety single rooted anterior teeth were randomly divided into four experimental groups of 15 teeth each and 3 control groups of 10 each. Sealer-antibiotic combination was used as a sealer in experimental group. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally to assess linear dye penetration. pH and viscosity of the experimental groups were evaluated with Elico pH Meter and Brook Field Viscometer respectively. RESULTS: (Amoxicillin+ ZOE) Group II and (Clindamycin + ZOE) Group IV have shown minimum linear dye leakage of 1.07mm & 1.22 mm respectively & (Ciprofloxacin + ZOE) Group III and (Doxycycline + ZOE) Group V 2.69 mm & 2.59 mm respectively. There was decrease in the viscosity of the experimental group. pH was found to be 8.55 for Group II sealer which was greater than control group. CONCLUSION: Amoxicillin and sealer combination can improve the success rate of endodontic therapy by enhancing the antimicrobial activity, alkaline environment and reducing apical microleakage.
