Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 19: 17455057231175311, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37334467

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with restricted access to reproductive care including delayed abortion and female sterilization procedures, in addition to altered maternity care experiences. Given high rates of unintended and short-interval pregnancies in the United States in general and negative obstetric outcomes specifically associated with COVID-19, access to all effective pregnancy prevention methods during the pandemic was crucial. OBJECTIVES: To investigate changes in contraception utilization rates prior to delivery discharge, at outpatient postpartum visits, and at 10 weeks' postpartum, at the largest healthcare system in Central Massachusetts, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (15 March to 15 May 2020), compared to the same period in 2019. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort review. METHODS: Compared perinatal individuals (n = 495) who received prenatal care and delivered at UMass Memorial Medical Center from mid-March to mid-May in both 2019 (non-pandemic) and 2020 (COVID-19 pandemic). Receipt of contraception prior to delivery discharge and at outpatient postpartum visit was estimated and compared between the two time periods using the Chi-square test for categorical variables (or Fisher's exact test when cell counts were < 5) and Student's t-test for continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: The proportion of individuals who used long-acting reversible contraception before delivery discharge was 4% in 2019 and 13% in 2020 (p = 0.01). Modes of outpatient postpartum visit contraception did not vary from 2019 to 2020, (p = 0.06). Overall, there were no differences in contraception utilization rates at 10 weeks' postpartum from 2019 to 2020, (p = 0.50). CONCLUSION: Compared to a year prior, immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use increased during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, while overall contraception use at 10 weeks' postpartum remained unchanged. The evaluation of contraceptive use during the most restrictive time of COVID-19 pandemic can help identify opportunities to increase access to effective contraception, such as the immediate postpartum period prior to hospital discharge.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Anticoncepção , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Anticoncepção/tendências , Pandemias , Período Pós-Parto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Hypertens ; 40(4): 776-784, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081582

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) in pregnancy is a leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States. Contraception is widely used, and estrogen-based combined hormonal forms are known to increase blood pressure (BP). With nearly half of pregnancies unplanned and many antihypertensive medications teratogenic, appropriate contraception is critical in child-bearing age women with HTN. METHODS: Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) from 2001 to 2018, we evaluated contraception and antihypertensive medication use in women of child-bearing age (20-50 years). Women who had undergone sterilization or menopause were excluded. HTN was defined based on a self-reported provider diagnosis and BP ≥130/80 mm Hg or antihypertensive medication use. Contraception included non-barrier methods (pills/patch/ring, injections, long-acting reversible contraceptives) or consistent condom use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of contraception use. Temporal trends in contraception use were reported. RESULTS: Of the 8726 women, 12.4% had HTN with mean age (standard error) 36.0 (0.3) years. In women with HTN, 9.2% used non-barrier contraception and 10.4% used condoms only. Over half (52.7%) of women with HTN on antihypertensive medications were taking medications contraindicated in pregnancy, with no difference seen by contraceptive status. In logistic regression models, contraceptive use was lower in the older-aged women. In women with HTN on non-barrier contraception, combined hormonal contraceptive use declined, from 100% (2001-2006) to 81.4% (2013-2018, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many women with self-reported HTN are not using adequate contraception. Of the small proportion on non-barrier contraceptives, the majority are using estrogen-based, BP-raising methods.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais , Hipertensão , Adulto , Anticoncepção/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Gravidez , Esterilização Reprodutiva , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Contraception ; 109: 80-81, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092740

RESUMO

We describe a complication from same-day cervical preparation with simultaneous use of Aquacryl hydrogel osmotic dilator, laminaria and misoprostol vaginally for a same-day dilation and evacuation procedure at 19 weeks' gestation. The laminaria fragmented and embedded in the cervix at the time of procedure. Removal was unsuccessful in clinic and the patient was discharged on one week of antibiotics. The patient returned after the administration of misoprostol vaginally and the surgeon found the fragment in the vagina. We cannot conclude if the fragment was expelled with misoprostol use or prior to its administration.


Assuntos
Abortivos não Esteroides , Aborto Induzido , Laminaria , Misoprostol , Aborto Induzido/métodos , Dilatação , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez
4.
Matern Child Health J ; 22(11): 1624-1631, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29931493

RESUMO

Objectives The postpartum period is a high-risk time for unintended pregnancy, and additional opportunities to provide contraception are needed. Our objective was to evaluate the acceptability of providing postpartum contraceptive counseling at a pediatric well baby visit, and compare it to counseling at the routine postpartum visit. Methods Postpartum women (100 per group) were recruited for this cohort study at pediatric well baby visits and obstetric postpartum visits at an academic medical center. Well baby participants completed a baseline survey followed by contraceptive counseling by an obstetrician or midwife and a post-counseling survey. Postpartum participants were surveyed after their visit only. Results All well baby visit participants completed the intervention and were enrolled earlier in the postpartum period than postpartum visit participants (mean = 4.1 vs. 6.6 weeks, respectively, p < 0.01). Following counseling, 95% of well baby participants reported being very comfortable discussing contraception, compared to 83% before counseling (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06, 1.25) and a higher proportion reported being very likely to use a contraception prescription obtained at the well baby visit (79% after counseling vs. 65% before; RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08, 1.39). Similar proportions of postpartum and well baby participants were very comfortable discussing contraception at their visits (91 vs. 95%, respectively). Conclusions for practice Contraceptive counseling paired with well baby visits is acceptable among postpartum women. Acceptability increased further after the counseling intervention at the well baby visit. Obstetricians and Pediatricians can partner to offer contraceptive counseling at the well baby visit to increase opportunities for contraception education at an earlier time postpartum.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Aconselhamento/métodos , Mães/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Período Pós-Parto , Adolescente , Adulto , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/organização & administração , Anticoncepção/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Addiction ; 112(9): 1638-1646, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28387979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Unintended pregnancy rates are high among women with substance use disorders (SUDs), which could be explained partly by lower use of and adherence to contraception. We aimed to test: (1) the association of SUD with prescription contraceptive use, contraceptive method selection and adherence; (2) whether practices participating in the Patient-Centered Medical Home Initiative (PCMHI) had better contraceptive use and adherence for patients with SUD; and (3) for differences in the association of SUD with adherence by type of contraceptive used. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of claims and encounter data. SETTING: Massachusetts, USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 47 902 women aged 16-45 years enrolled in Medicaid or Commonwealth Care in Massachusetts between 2010 and 2014. MEASUREMENTS: We examined three dependent variables: (1) use of a reversible prescription contraceptive during 2012; (2) the contraceptive methods used; and (3) the proportion of days covered by a prescription contraceptive in the year following the first prescription contraceptive claim. The primary predictor was diagnosed SUD, defined as at least one claim for an alcohol or drug use disorder. FINDINGS: SUD was associated with lower rates of prescription contraceptive use during 2012 [19.2 versus 23.9%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.79, P < 0.001]. SUD was associated with decreased selection of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) compared with short-acting contraception (SARC) (42.8 versus 44.5%; aOR = 0.83, P = 0.011). There was no significant association between SUD and adherence (aOR = 0.84, P = 0.068). PCMHI enrollment did not alter the relationship between SUD and contraceptive use or adherence. Contraceptive method did not impact the relationship between SUD and adherence. CONCLUSION: Women with substance use disorders are less likely to use prescription contraceptives, especially long-acting methods, but are not significantly less likely to adhere to them once prescribed than women without substance use disorders.


Assuntos
Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 29(6): 612-616, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27222491

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether complications during pregnancy or at delivery influence postpartum contraception choices and rapid repeat pregnancy rates in adolescent women. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This retrospective cohort study included 321 adolescents delivering at UMASS Memorial Healthcare. Complications during pregnancy and delivery along with subsequent contraception use were investigated. Postpartum contraception choice (long-acting reversible contraception [LARC] vs non-LARC) at either delivery, hospitalization discharge, or at postpartum outpatient appointment, and rapid repeat pregnancy rate (pregnancy confirmed within 12 months of index delivery), were analyzed according to pregnancy complications. Comparisons were made with χ2 and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, and with Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Of the study population, 27.7% (n = 89/321) used LARC in the postpartum period. The LARC and non-LARC patient populations differed significantly regarding history of abortion (P = .029), with no differences in obstetric complications between the groups. Of the population, 16.6% (n = 53/320) became pregnant again within 1 year of their index delivery. Those with a rapid repeat pregnancy had significantly increased gravidity (P = .002), parity (P = .003), number of previous spontaneous or therapeutic abortions (P = .026); they were also more like to have nonlive birth as a complication (P = .028), compared with those without repeat pregnancy. No other obstetrical complications were statistically significantly different between the compared groups. CONCLUSION: Obstetrical complications seem to have little effect on postpartum contraception choice or repeat pregnancy rate with the notable exception of nonlive birth being associated with rapid repeat pregnancy.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo/psicologia , Período Pós-Parto/psicologia , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Taxa de Gravidez , Gravidez na Adolescência/psicologia , Aborto Induzido/psicologia , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Anticoncepção/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/psicologia , Feminino , Número de Gestações , Humanos , Paridade , Gravidez , Gravidez na Adolescência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 23(6): 519-24, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24443930

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Unplanned pregnancy is a public health problem in the United States, including in rural areas. Primary care physicians are the main providers of health care to women in rural areas and are uniquely positioned to help reduce unplanned pregnancy in rural women. This study documents provision of contraception by rural primary care physicians, focusing on the most effective, long acting methods, intrauterine devices (IUDs) and contraceptive implants. METHODS: We surveyed all primary care physicians practicing in rural areas of Illinois and Wisconsin. Bivariate analysis was performed using chi squared and Fisher's exact test, and multivariable analysis was performed with logistic regression to determine factors associated with provision. RESULTS: The response rate was 862 out of 2312 physicians (37%). Nine percent of respondents place implants and 35% place IUDs. Eighty-seven percent of physicians had not had training in implant placement, and 41% had not had training in IUD placement. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with placement of long acting contraception include provision of maternity care, and female gender of the physician. The most common reasons for not providing the methods were lack of training and perceived low demand from patients. CONCLUSIONS: Many rural primary care providers do not place long acting contraceptive devices due to lack of training. Female physicians and those providing maternity care are the most likely to place these devices. Increased training for primary care physicians both during and after residency would help increase access to these options for women in rural areas.


Assuntos
Dispositivos Anticoncepcionais Femininos/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Implantes de Medicamento/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Illinois , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada/psicologia , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Inquéritos e Questionários , Wisconsin
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...