Outcomes of arthroscopic versus open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of acute traumatic lunate fractures: a systematic review.

The purpose of the study was to compare outcomes of fully-arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to treat acute traumatic lunate fractures. A literature search was conducted using Medline and Embase. Demographic data and outcomes were extracted for included studies. The search identified 2146 references: 17 articles were included, reporting on 20 cases (4 ARIF and 16 ORIF). No differences between ARIF and ORIF were found in rates of union (100% vs 93%, P = 1.000), grip strengths (mean difference, 8%; 95%CI, -16 to 31; P = 0.592), rates of return to work (100% vs 100%, P = 1.000), or ranges of motion (mean difference, 28°; 95%CI, -25 to 80; P = 0.426). Lunate fractures were not identified in 6 of the 19 radiographs, but were identified in all CT scans. There were no differences in outcomes between ARIF and ORIF for the treatment of fresh lunate fractures. The authors recommend surgeons to perform CT scans when diagnosing high-energy wrist trauma so as not to overlook lunate fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

3D imaging has good specificity but poor sensitivity for the diagnosis of pathologies of the long head of the biceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To systematically review and meta-analyse the literature to determine which three-dimensional (3D) imaging modality provides the best diagnostic accuracy to detect pathologies of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was performed on PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane. Studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of 3D imaging modalities versus arthroscopy for the assessment of LHBT pathologies were included. Studies assessing superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions were excluded. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included; nine were eligible for meta-analysis. Six studies on instability indicated a sensitivity of 0.68 (CI 0.46-0.84) and specificity of 0.76 (CI 0.68-0.82). Four studies on full-thickness tears indicated a sensitivity of 0.56 (CI 0.28-0.81) and specificity of 0.97 (CI 0.93-0.99). Four studies on partial-thickness tears indicated a sensitivity of 0.52 (CI 0.20-0.82) and specificity of 0.64 (CI 0.25-0.91). Two studies on any tear indicated a sensitivity of 0.58 (CI 0.28-0.83) and specificity of 0.99 (CI 0.93-1.00). Only one study on other pathologies indicated a sensitivity of 0.61 and specificity of 0.84. CONCLUSION: To diagnose LHBT pathologies, 3D imaging modalities overall have low-to-moderate sensitivity, but high-to-excellent specificity. The consistency in reported sensitivity is generally poor, while the consistency and reported specificity is good for the detection of instability, full-thickness tears and any tear, but poor for the detection of partial-thickness tears. 3D imaging may be adequate to rule out LHBT pathologies, but are not sufficiently reliable to confirm the presence of such pathologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.