Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in patients with surgically repaired heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Congenital and acquired heart disease complicate 1% to 4% of pregnancies in the United States. Beyond the risks of the underlying maternal congenital heart disease, cardiac surgery and its sequelae, such as surgical scarring resulting in higher rates of arrhythmias and implanted valves altering anticoagulation status, have potential implications that could affect gestation and delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether history of maternal cardiac surgery is associated with adverse obstetrical or neonatal outcomes compared with patients without a history of cardiac disease or surgery, considered "healthy controls." STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of retrospective cohort studies performed at a tertiary care facility in the United States comparing obstetrical outcomes in patients with a history of open cardiac surgery who delivered from January 2007 to December 2018 with healthy controls, who delivered from April 2020 to July 2020. There were 74 pregnancies in 61 patients with a history of open cardiac surgery that were compared with pregnancies in healthy controls. Of the 74 pregnancies, 65 were successfully matched based on gestational age to controls at a 1:3 (case-to-control) ratio. The remainder of cases were matched at a 1:2 or 1:1 ratio; therefore, a total of 219 control pregnancies were included in the analysis. Our primary outcome was the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, as well as cesarean delivery, in patients with a history of open cardiac surgery compared with healthy controls. Our secondary outcome was the incidence of low-birthweight neonates in patients with a history of open cardiac surgery compared with healthy controls. RESULTS: Patients with a history of cardiac surgery were not more likely to have any hypertensive disorder diagnosed than healthy controls. Patients with a history of cardiac surgery were more likely to have an operative delivery (P<.0001) but equally likely to have a cesarean delivery (P=.528) compared with healthy controls. Birthweight was not statistically different of 2655±808 g in neonates born to patients with a history of cardiac surgery vs 2844±830 g born to healthy controls (P=.092). CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of cardiac surgery may not be at higher risk of hypertensive disorder diagnosis during pregnancy. Similarly, most patients with a history of cardiac surgery are also likely not at higher risk of cesarean delivery or low-birthweight neonates.

Developing Awareness and Allies: Simulating Difficult Conversations about Microaggressions for Faculty and Students.

OBJECTIVES: Discrimination and bias in clinical training often take the form of microaggressions, which, albeit unintentional, are detrimental to the learning environment and well-being of students. Although there are a few reports of medical schools training students to respond to microaggressions, none have included a complementery student-led faculty training module. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a case-based approach to improving student resilience and increasing faculty awareness of microaggressions in the clinical setting. METHODS: We created four realistic cases of microaggressions and uncomfortable conversations, based on students' experiences on the wards, to implement training for incoming third-year students and their core faculty. Standardized patients were trained to effectively portray discriminatory faculty, residents, and patients. Institutional review board-approved surveys were administered and statistically analyzed to evaluate for efficacy. RESULTS: Students had greater mean confidence scores for responding to microaggressions immediately and at 6 months after the sessions (P < 0.05). Faculty showed improved mean confidence and understanding of the definition of a microaggression (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This approach had results similar to other studies, with the additional benefit of training faculty with the same scenarios. We believe that this method helped bridge the gap between students' notions of discrimination and faculty understanding of microaggressions.

An intersectional analysis of contraceptive types chosen among sexual minority women: A nationally representative study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to use an intersectional approach in which race, insurance, care setting, and disclosure of sexual orientation to a provider are used to assess patterns of contraceptive use in sexual minority women. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzes cross-sectional data from the 2011-2019 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Sexual orientation of 21,075 respondents' data was used to investigate contraceptive use in sexual minority women, specifically lesbian and bisexual women, as compared to heterosexual women, controlling for variables such as race, age, and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: Black and Hispanic lesbian women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.39 confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.76 and aOR = 0.44 CI 0.23-0.82, respectively) and Hispanic and Other Race bisexual women use hormonal contraceptive methods less than their White lesbian and bisexual peers (aOR = 0.45 CI 0.29-0.69 and aOR = 0.43 CI 0.20-0.94). Care setting was not correlated with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods (LARC; such as intra-uterine device, hormonal implants) or prescription-based hormonal methods (such as oral contraceptive pills, injectables, vaginal rings, and patches) in lesbian women (aOR = 2.92 CI 0.60-14.2 and aOR = 1.43 CI 0.47-4.38, respectively) or bisexual women (aOR = 0.90 CI 0.48-1.58 and aOR = 0.83 CI 0.37-1.86), but it was for straight women (aOR = 1.28 CI 1.03-1.59 and aOR = 0.68 CI 0.53-0.86). Similarly, insurance status did not correlate with contraceptive patterns in sexual minority women. Importantly, adjusting for nationally representative data did not impact the results; in other words, the odds ratios after adjusting yielded the same results as before adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance and care setting are important determinants of straight women's contraceptive use patterns with fewer effects seen among sexual minority women. These findings support previous work and indicate that known advantages of insurance coverage or use of public clinics may not positively impact sexual minority women as much as they do straight women. Provider awareness of sexual identity and sexual orientation is important for adequate contraceptive care. IMPLICATIONS: While prior research has presented findings on sexual minority women contraceptive use, to our knowledge there are limited studies that address the social and demographic implications for contraceptive use in this population.

'What a Pretty Assistant You Have': Addressing Sex-Based Harassment by Patient Offenders in Undergraduate Medical Training.

Sex-based harassment remains a concern in the medical workplace environment and is negatively associated with physical and mental health complications. Presently, undergraduate medical education fails to provide students with the appropriate toolset to successfully handle sex-based harassment by patient offenders. Through peer discussion and personal experience from a medical student perspective, herein we suggest strategies for individuals at all levels of medical training to help mitigate these uncomfortable situations. Simulation-based training and implementation of frameworks regarding microaggressions are crucial components of the medical curricula which must be incorporated expediently to create cultural change and help combat pre-existing historical precedents.