Evolutionary divergence of neuroanatomical organization and related genes in chimpanzees and bonobos.

Given their close genetic relatedness to humans, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) offer an essential comparative framework for studying the evolution of uniquely human traits. These two species differ markedly in their socio-behavioral repertoires, which is reflected in neuroanatomical differences that have been reported in the literature. However, phylogenetic comparative methods have not yet been used to map the evolution of neuroanatomical traits in bonobos and chimpanzees, limiting our ability to understand which neural systems are derived in each species in relation to the last common ancestor of Pan (Pan-LCA). Here, we examine evolutionary changes in neuroanatomical traits of bonobos and chimpanzees relative to ancestral character reconstructions of the Pan-LCA using comparative datasets from hominoids. We found that bonobo brains are derived in showing reduction of whole brain and white matter volumes, with particularly striking reduction of male brain size compared to the inferred Pan-LCA value. Brain structures related to social cognition and emotional regulation, like the insular cortex and amygdala, display a mosaic pattern of evolution with certain traits changing to a greater extent in each species. Examination of potential genetic mechanisms underlying divergence of neural and social traits did not reveal clear differences in protein evolution patterns between the two species. These findings suggest that the brain anatomy of extant bonobos and chimpanzees show lineage-specific specializations and neither can be considered to more closely retain the ancestral state of Pan. Consequently, this raises questions about the extent that modern chimpanzees or bonobos may serve as referential models for the neuroanatomy of the LCA of humans and apes.

Forensic anthropology in the global investigation of humanitarian and human rights abuse: Perspective from the published record.

Forensic anthropologists have played key roles in the historical development of forensic science applications to global humanitarian and human rights issues. These anthropological initiatives can be traced back to the Smithsonian seminar organized by T. D. Stewart in 1968 and published in 1970. Key developments include the 1984 delegation sent by the American Association for the Advancement of Science to Argentina and the formation of the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team. Subsequent highlights include major anthropological involvement in support of investigations by international criminal tribunals, formation of forensic anthropology teams in different countries and activities of the International Commission of Missing Persons and the forensic unit of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Recent developments feature the formation of the Humanitarian and Human Rights Resource Center of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences and its support of worthwhile projects in many countries. The published record provides historical perspective on these developments.