Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 92: 189-200, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29242155

RESUMO

The influence of exposure duration on chemical toxicity has important implications for risk assessment. Although a default 10-fold extrapolation factor is commonly applied when the toxicological dataset includes a subchronic (90-day) study but lacks studies of chronic duration, little consensus has been reached on an appropriate extrapolation factor to apply when the dataset includes a 28-day study but lacks studies of longer durations. The goal of the present assessment was to identify a 28-day to 90-day extrapolation factor by analyzing distributions of ratios of No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Levels (NOAELs) and Benchmark Doses (BMDs) derived from 28-day and 90-day studies. The results of this analysis suggest that a default 10-fold extrapolation factor in chemical risk assessment applications is sufficient to account for the uncertainty associated with evaluating human health risk based on results from a 28-day study in the absence of results from a 90-day study. This analysis adds significantly to the growing body of literature interpreting the influence of exposure duration on chemical toxicity that will likewise facilitate discussions on the future state of testing requirements in the international regulatory community.


Assuntos
Substâncias Perigosas/administração & dosagem , Substâncias Perigosas/toxicidade , Animais , Benchmarking/métodos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Incerteza
2.
Int J Toxicol ; 34(5): 384-92, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26268770

RESUMO

Although several studies have shown that chemically mediated epigenetic changes are an etiological factor in several human disease conditions, the utility of epigenetic data, such as DNA methylation, in the current human health risk assessment paradigm is unclear. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between the points of departure (PODs) for cancer incidence and DNA methylation changes in laboratory animals exposed to the following environmental toxicants: bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, chloroform, hydrazine, trichloroethylene, benzidine, trichloroacetic acid, and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP; a known reproductive toxicant). The results demonstrate that the PODs for cancer incidence and altered DNA methylation are similar. Furthermore, based on the available data, the POD for DNA methylation appeared more sensitive compared to that for cancer incidence following the administration of DEHP to rats during different life stages. The high degree of correlation between PODs for cancer incidence and DNA methylation (for both total DNA and individual genes) suggests that DNA methylation end points could potentially be used as a screening tool in predicting the potential toxicity/carcinogenicity and in prioritizing large numbers of chemicals with sparse toxicity databases. The life stage during which treatment occurs is also an important consideration when assessing the potential application of epigenetic end points as a screening tool.


Assuntos
Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Metilação de DNA , Epigênese Genética , Animais , Benzidinas/toxicidade , Dietilexilftalato/toxicidade , Humanos , Hidrazinas/toxicidade , Hidrocarbonetos Halogenados/toxicidade , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/genética , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...