Impact of Locoregional Therapies for Brain Lesions on Survival in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Multiple Extrathoracic Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The treatment of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically involves surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy (single or combination therapy). However, the impact of these therapies on the survival of patients with NSCLC with multiple extrathoracic metastases has not yet been determined. Therefore, in the present study, we examined the prognostic effect of multimodal treatment for brain metastases in patients with NSCLC with multiple extrathoracic metastases in the absence of driver mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC with multiple extrathoracic metastases (including at least one brain metastasis), who visited Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2016, were enrolled in this study; follow-up was conducted until December 31, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were enrolled, including 12 and 44 patients with single and multiple brain metastases, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 4.9 months, and did not differ significantly between patients with single and multiple brain metastases (3.0 vs. 4.9 months, respectively). The selection of locoregional treatment for brain metastases did not depend on Karnofsky performance status (p=0.0862). Among patients with multiple brain metastases, the OS for those who underwent craniotomy followed by whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), those who received only WBRT, and those treated without locoregional therapy was 47.7, 3.9, and 15.9 months, respectively (p=0.00382). CONCLUSION: Surgical resection followed by radiation therapy is an effective treatment option for brain metastases in patients with multiple metastases. However, WBRT alone did not improve prognosis.

Initial rapidity of tumor growth as a prognostic factor for the therapeutic effect of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: evaluation for linear and non-linear correlation.

BACKGROUND: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been increasingly used for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment in recent years. Although insufficient, the rate of programmed death-ligand 1 expression has been adopted as a predictor of ICI efficacy. We evaluated tumor growth rate as a clinically easy-to-use predictor of the therapeutic effect of ICIs. METHODS: This study is a single-institution retrospective study in Japan. NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab at Saitama Medical Center from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 were enrolled, and followed until December 31, 2020. We defined and calculated the initial rapidity of tumor progression (IRP) as: the increase in the sum of the diameters of intrathoracic tumors and lymph nodes on two series of chest computed tomography (CT) scans (one obtained at an initial checkup and the other obtained immediately before the first treatment) divided by the number of days between these CT scans. Two coefficients were calculated: the maximal information coefficient (MIC) between IRP and time to treatment failure (TTF) using the Python package with minepy library, and the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (median age, 70 years; 47 men) were enrolled. The median TTF with ICIs was 126 days, and four patients continued to receive ICI treatment at the end of the follow-up. The MIC between IRP and TTF was 0.302 with weak correlation, and the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was -0.347 (P=0.00938). CONCLUSIONS: The initial tumor growth rate had a negative linear correlation with the therapeutic effect of ICIs.

Validation of prognostic impact of number of extrathoracic metastases according to the eighth TNM classification: a single-institution retrospective study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In the eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer, the M1b and M1c descriptors are newly defined by the number of extrathoracic metastases. To verify the prognostic value of these descriptors in Japan, we reclassified our cases and re-evaluated prognosis in M1b and M1c patients. METHODS: All non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with extrathoracic metastases who visited Saitama Medical Center from 2010 to 2016 were evaluated, divided according to the eighth edition of the TNM classification criteria into two groups (M1b, patients with single extrathoracic metastasis, and M1c, patients with multiple extrathoracic metastases), and followed up until December 31, 2017. Survival time analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and between-group differences in overall survival time (OS) were evaluated by the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 231 NSCLC patients were divided into 57 patients with M1b and 174 with M1c. Median OS was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3-19.9) and 7.3 months (95% CI 5.7-10.7) for M1b and M1c, respectively, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.239). However, after excluding patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) fusion gene, median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI 7.2-19.9) for M1b and 5.4 months (95% CI 3.8-6.3) for M1c, respectively, showing a significant difference (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of therapy directed toward EGFR mutation or EML4-ALK fusion gene might obscure the significant prognostic difference between M1b and M1c.