Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Public Health Rep ; 132(1_suppl): 88S-94S, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28692388

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Limited studies have examined the usefulness of syndromic surveillance to monitor emergency department (ED) visits involving suicidal ideation or attempt. The objectives of this study were to (1) examine whether syndromic surveillance of chief complaint data can detect suicide-related ED visits among adults and (2) assess the added value of using hospital ED data on discharge diagnoses to detect suicide-related visits. METHODS: The study data came from the District of Columbia electronic syndromic surveillance system, which provides daily information on ED visits at 8 hospitals in Washington, DC. We detected suicide-related visits by searching for terms in the chief complaints and discharge diagnoses of 248 939 ED visits for which data were available for October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016. We examined whether detection of suicide-related visits according to chief complaint data, discharge diagnosis data, or both varied by patient sex, age, or hospital. RESULTS: The syndromic surveillance system detected 1540 suicide-related ED visits, 950 (62%) of which were detected through chief complaint data and 590 (38%) from discharge diagnosis data. The source of detection for suicide-related ED visits did not vary by patient sex or age. However, whether the suicide-related terms were mentioned in the chief complaint or discharge diagnosis differed across hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: ED syndromic surveillance systems based on chief complaint data alone would underestimate the number of suicide-related ED visits. Incorporating the discharge diagnosis into the case definition could help improve detection.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Ideação Suicida , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Diagnóstico , District of Columbia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 78(6): e631-e637, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28406268

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined self-reported reasons for not receiving mental health treatment among adults with past-year serious suicidal thoughts and their sociodemographic characteristics associated with these reasons. METHODS: Using the 2008-2013 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health, we examined 8,400 respondents aged 18 years or older who had past-year serious thoughts of suicide and did not receive mental health treatment that year. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported reasons for not receiving mental health treatment among these suicidal adults. RESULTS: Among adults with serious suicidal thoughts who did not receive mental health treatment in the past year, three-fourths did not feel the need for treatment. Of the one-fourth of those who felt the need for treatment, the main reason for not receiving treatment was financial (58.4%), followed by logistical reasons such as not knowing where to go (36.1%). A greater proportion of suicidal adults than nonsuicidal adults perceived more than 1 barrier to treatment (43.8% vs 34.3%). Among suicidal adults who did not receive mental health treatment that year, the odds of not feeling the need for mental health treatment were higher in men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.42-1.99), adults aged 50 years or older (AOR = 3.02; 95% CI, 2.02-4.51), racial and ethnic minorities (AORs = 1.59-2.13), publicly insured (AOR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.14-2.07), and nonmetropolitan residents (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.20-1.88). CONCLUSIONS: Most suicidal adults did not feel the need for mental health treatment. Of those who felt the need, multiple barriers were identified. A multifaceted approach to address these barriers is needed to promote receipt of mental health treatment among this vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Ideação Suicida , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autorrelato , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(10): 278-281, 2017 Mar 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28301453

RESUMO

On September 8, 2015, the District of Columbia Department of Health (DCDOH) received a call from a person who reported experiencing gastrointestinal illness after eating at a District of Columbia (DC) restaurant with multiple locations throughout the United States (restaurant A). Later the same day, a local emergency department notified DCDOH to report four persons with gastrointestinal illness, all of whom had eaten at restaurant A during August 30-September 5. Two patients had laboratory-confirmed Salmonella group D by stool culture. On the evening of September 9, a local newspaper article highlighted a possible outbreak associated with restaurant A. Investigation of the outbreak by DCDOH identified 159 patrons who were residents of 11 states and DC with gastrointestinal illness after eating at restaurant A during July 1-September 10. A case-control study was conducted, which suggested truffle oil-containing food items as a possible source of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis infection. Although several violations were noted during the restaurant inspections, the environmental, laboratory, and traceback investigations did not confirm the contamination source. Because of concern about the outbreak, the restaurant's license was suspended during September 10-15. The collaboration and cooperation of the public, media, health care providers, and local, state, and federal public health officials facilitated recognition of this outbreak involving a pathogen commonly implicated in foodborne illness.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Óleos , Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella/epidemiologia , Salmonella enteritidis/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , District of Columbia/epidemiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Restaurantes , Adulto Jovem
4.
Crisis ; 38(5): 309-318, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27869507

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few studies have addressed on the role of parent-child connectedness (PCC) on adolescents' risk for suicidal ideation from a longitudinal, developmental perspective. AIM: This study examined PCC during adolescence and risk of suicidal ideation into adulthood among a nationally representative sample of American adolescents. METHOD: The study includes 13,234 adolescents aged 11-18 from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) who were surveyed during adolescence (1994-1995) and then again in early adulthood (2008-2009). Multinomial logistic regression estimated the association between PCC during adolescence and having ideation during the adolescence period only, in adulthood only, and in both adolescence and adulthood as compared with those without suicidal ideation. RESULTS: After adjusting for depressive symptoms and other parent and adolescent characteristics, adolescents in two-parent households who reported higher PCC during adolescence had lower relative risk of having ideation during adolescence alone and in both adolescence and adulthood. In mother-only households, higher mother connectedness was also associated with decreased risk of having adolescent ideation. CONCLUSION: PCC is an important modifiable target for the prevention of suicidal ideation from adolescence into adulthood.


Assuntos
Relações Pais-Filho , Ideação Suicida , Adolescente , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Psicologia , Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Família Monoparental/psicologia , Família Monoparental/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Psychiatr Serv ; 67(7): 758-65, 2016 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26975518

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study compared sociodemographic characteristics and health conditions of adults with a major depressive episode who received treatment from general medical providers or specialty mental health providers. METHODS: The sample included 17,700 respondents ages 18-64 from the 2008-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health who met the DSM-IV criteria for a major depressive episode in the past 12 months and of whom 8,900 (61.5%) received treatment for depression. RESULTS: Approximately 21% of adults with a major depressive episode received depression care from general providers only, 19% from specialists only, and 19% from both. Compared with adults receiving care from general providers only, adults who received care from both types of provider were younger, had higher education, were more likely to have suicidal ideation and functional impairment, and were more likely to reside in a county with more psychiatrists providing patient care. These adults, compared with those who received care from a specialty mental health provider only, were more likely to be female, have higher education, have a greater number of general medical comorbidities, and have functional impairment, but they were less likely to be non-Hispanic black or Hispanic. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with major depressive episodes who received depression care from both general and specialty providers differed from those who received care from either provider type. Continued efforts to understand differences in depression care in specialty mental health and general medical settings may help improve the provision of mental health services as health care reform continues.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Psychiatr Serv ; 67(1): 119-23, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26369881

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study characterized mental health facilities that offer suicide prevention services or outcome follow-up after discharge. METHODS: The study analyzed data from 8,459 U.S. mental health facilities that participated in the 2010 National Mental Health Services Survey. Logistic regression analyses were used to compare facilities that offered neither of the prevention services with those that offered both or either service. RESULTS: About one-fifth of mental health facilities reported offering neither suicide prevention services nor outcome follow-up. Approximately one-third offered both, 25% offered suicide prevention services only, and 21% offered only outcome follow-up after discharge. Facilities that offered neither service were less likely than facilities that offered either to offer comprehensive support services or special programs for veterans; to offer substance abuse services; and to be accredited, licensed, or certified. CONCLUSIONS: Further examination of facilitators and barriers in implementing suicide prevention services in mental health facilities is warranted.


Assuntos
Hospitais Psiquiátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevenção do Suicídio , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 37(4): 340-6, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25959110

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the differences in the level of perceived helpfulness of treatments received for a major depressive episode (MDE) from a general medical provider only, a specialty mental health provider only or both. METHOD: This study examined a sample of 8900 respondents from the 2008-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health aged 18-64 who had past 12-month MDE (based on criteria specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth edition) and received treatment for depression. Generalized ordered logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the association between the type of treatment providers and perceived helpfulness of depression treatment. RESULTS: Adults who received depression treatment from either specialty mental health providers alone or from both specialty mental health providers and general medical providers in the past year were more likely to report that treatment helped them. The differences persisted after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, comorbid health conditions, receipt of depression medication and severity of depression (adjusted odds ratios across level of perceived helpfulness ranged from 1.63 to 3.96). CONCLUSIONS: This finding calls for greater attention to factors associated with provider type and organizational context that may contribute to differences in perceived helpfulness of depression treatment.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Satisfação do Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Percepção , Médicos de Família , Enfermagem Psiquiátrica , Psiquiatria , Psicologia , Assistentes Sociais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...