Motor Evoked Potentials in Newly Diagnosed and Treated Patients With Wilson Disease.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether patients with Wilson disease have abnormal motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. METHODS: In a prospective, observational, single-center study, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to examine MEPs recorded from the abductor digiti minimi in 24 newly diagnosed treatment-naive patients and 21 treated patients with Wilson disease. RESULTS: Motor evoked potentials were recorded in 22 (91.7%) newly diagnosed treatment-naive patients and in 20 (95.2%) treated patients. Abnormal MEP parameters were found in a similar proportion of newly diagnosed and treated patients: MEP latency (38% vs. 29%), MEP amplitude (21% vs. 24%), central motor conduction time (29% vs. 29%), and resting motor threshold (68% vs. 52%). Abnormal MEP amplitude (P = 0.044) and resting motor threshold (P = 0.011) were more frequent in treated patients with brain MRI abnormalities but not in newly diagnosed patients. We did not observe significant improvement in MEPs parameters after 1 year of treatment introduction in eight examined patients. However, in one patient where MEPs were initially nondetectable, they were present 1 year after treatment introduction with zinc sulfate, although MEPs were not in the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Motor evoked potential parameters did not differ between newly diagnosed and treated patients. There was no significant improvement in MEP parameters one year after treatment introduction. Further studies conducted on large cohorts are necessary to determine the usefulness of MEPs in detecting pyramidal tract damage and improvement after anticopper treatment introduction in Wilson disease.

Kinetics of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) concentration levels in epileptic patients after generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by the periodic and unpredictable occurrence of seizures. The serum level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been suggested to be a potential biomarker that could detect differences in epilepsy patients. Although there is considerable neurobiological evidence linking BDNF to epilepsy, only a small number of studies investigated the relationship between BDNF serum levels and epilepsy, and these studies obtained inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to elucidate BDNF serum levels in epilepsy cases. METHODS: Collectively, group of 143 patients (n = 143) were included in this study and subsequently divided into two groups consisting of individuals after singular generalized tonic-clonic seizures (n = 50) and patients with chronic epilepsy (n = 93). The samples from patients with acute epilepsy were collected 1-3 hours and 72 h after seizure, and a single collection was performed from patients with chronic epilepsy. These samples were compared to the control group (n = 48) using ELISA. RESULTS: In the present study, we observed a significant decrease of BDNF serum levels in patients after generalized tonic-clonic seizures compared to the control group. Furthermore, the observed decrease of BDNF levels in this group was sustained at 1 and 72 h after seizure insult. We did not show the relationship between BDNF levels and age, etiology of epilepsy and the duration of illness. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results and the findings of previous studies indicate that the serum BDNF level significantly decreases after seizures and should be considered when measuring BDNF in patients with chronic epilepsy. It might be also influenced by neurodegenerative processes, which may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of particular epilepsy syndromes.

Fluoxetine for stroke recovery improvement - the doubleblind, randomised placebo-controlled FOCUS-Poland trial.

AIM OF STUDY: The Fluoxetine Or Control Under Supervision (FOCUS)-Poland trial tested in a Polish cohort the hypothesis that fluoxetine improves recovery after stroke. CLINICAL RATIONALE FOR STUDY: Some studies have suggested that fluoxetine may improve functional outcomes after stroke, but these results needed confirmation. Between 2012 and 2014, large clinical trials were initiated by the FOCUS Trial Collaboration. Recently, results from the UK, Sweden, Australia, New Zealand and Vietnam have been published. We here present the results of the FOCUS trial conducted in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study based on the FOCUS trial protocol. Patients who had a persisting neurological deficit were randomly assigned 2-15 days after stroke onset to receive for six months either fluoxetine 20 mg/day or a placebo. The primary outcome was functional status measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at six months after randomisation. Functional status at 12 months was also assessed, as was neurological deficit at six and 12 months. Data was also collected on adverse events. RESULTS: Between 19 December 2014 and 13 March 2018, 30 patients were given fluoxetine and 31 were given a placebo. For the primary outcome, the distribution across mRS categories was similar for the fluoxetine and placebo groups at six months (common odds ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval 0.31-2.50; p = 0.81), and there was no difference at 12 months (p = 0.864). There were no differences between groups in stroke recovery or in motor function recovery of the affected hand. There were no significant differences in any other secondary outcomes at six or 12 months. Patients given fluoxetine were less likely than those given the placebo to receive new antidepressant medication within six months (2 [6.67%] vs. 4 [12.90%]). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Consistent with other trials based on the FOCUS protocol, fluoxetine did not improve motor recovery or general stroke outcome at six and 12 months in the Polish cohort studied. However, patients receiving fluoxetine required therapy with additional antidepressant medication less frequently.

Prediction of Recovery and Outcome Using Motor Evoked Potentials and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Subacute Stroke.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) have been postulated to be useful in predicting recovery in patients with motor impairment. We aimed to investigate whether MEPs elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), serum brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its genotype have prognostic value on stroke recovery in patients with hand paresis due to stroke. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study. Patients underwent TMS with MEPs from abductor digiti minimi evaluation between 2-14 (D0) and 30 days (D30) after stroke and their impact on motor function of the upper limb and general outcome was assessed after 3 months (D90). The presence of a BDNF gene polymorphism was determined and serum BDNF concentrations were measured at D0, D30 and D90. RESULTS: The presence of MEPs and their amplitude at rest and in effort significantly correlated with improvement of upper-limb paresis and general outcome after 3 months. Resting motor threshold did not have prognostic value. Central motor conduction time and MEP latency less consistently predicted stroke outcome or motor deficit improvement. Neither BDNF polymorphisms nor BDNF concentration at D0, D30 and D90 corresponded with the degree of paresis or the independence of patients 3 months after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of MEPs and their amplitude are useful predictors of upper-limb motor function recovery and general outcome after stroke. BDNF concentration and its genotype had no prognostic value. Further studies conducted on large cohorts are necessary to determine the usefulness of these methods in motor recovery and stroke outcome prediction.

TMS-induced motor evoked potentials in Wilson's disease: a systematic literature review.

Wilson's disease (WD) is a metabolic brain disease resulting from improper copper metabolism. Although pyramidal symptoms are rarely observed, subclinical injury is highly possible as copper accumulates in all brain structures. The usefulness of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in pyramidal tracts damage evaluation still appears to be somehow equivocal. We searched for original papers assessing the value of transcranial magnetic stimulation elicited MEPs with respect to motor function of upper and lower extremity in WD. We searched PubMed for original papers evaluating use of MEPs in WD using key words: "motor evoked potentials Wilson's disease" and "transcranial magnetic stimulation Wilson's disease." We found six articles using the above key words. One additional article and one case report were found while viewing the references lists. Therefore, we included eight studies. Number of patients in studies was low and their clinical characteristic was variable. There were also differences in methodology. Abnormal MEPs were confirmed in 20-70% of study participants. MEPs were not recorded in 7.6-66.7% of patients. Four studies reported significantly increased cortical excitability (up to 70% of patients). Prolonged central motor conduction time was observed in four studies (30-100% of patients). One study reported absent or prolonged central motor latency in 66.7% of patients. Although MEPs may be abnormal in WD, this has not been thoroughly assessed. Hence, further studies are indispensable to evaluate MEPs' usefulness in assessing pyramidal tract damage in WD.

The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke − a systematic review of the literature.

The aim of this study was to systematically review published data on the value of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in predicting motor recovery of the upper extremity and general functional outcome early after stroke. We searched PubMed for original prognostic studies. Only full-text original papers evaluating the prognostic value of MEPs elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in motor function recovery of the upper extremity were included in this review. Data from the studies included in the review are presented in two tables: one shows the general characteristics of the studies and the other gives methodological details and results. Of 842 publications, only 15 met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Data from 14 trials provided evidence that TMS of the motor cortex, eliciting MEPs, is a reliable tool for predicting motor recovery as well as functional outcome. The interpretation of the results was complicated by methodological differences between the included studies.