Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circ J ; 84(7): 1112-1117, 2020 06 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418957

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Central venous pressure (CVP) is measured to assess intravascular fluid status. Although the clinical gold standard for evaluating CVP is invasive measurement using catheterization, the use of catheterization is limited in a clinical setting because of its invasiveness. We developed novel non-invasive technique, enclosed-zone (ezCVPTM) measurement for estimating CVP. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of ezCVP and the relationship between ezCVP and CVP measured by a catheter.Methods and Results:We conducted 291 measurements in 97 patients. Linear regression analysis revealed that ezCVP was significantly correlated with CVP (r=0.65, P<0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis showed that ezCVP had an underestimation bias of -2.5 mmHg with 95% limits of agreement of -14.1 mmHg and 9.6 mmHg for CVP (P<0.0001). The areas under the curves of receiver operating curve with ezCVP to detect the CVP ≥12 cmH2O (8.8 mmHg) and CVP >10 mmHg were 0.81 or 0.88, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio of ezCVP for the CVP ≥8.8 mmHg and CVP >10 mmHg were 0.59, 0.96 and 14.8 with a cut-off value of 11.9 and 0.79, 0.97 and 26.3 with a cut-off value of 12.7. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ezCVP measurement is feasible and useful for assessing CVP.


Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Pressão Venosa Central , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oscilometria , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
J Echocardiogr ; 11: 123-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24319340

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a most common cause of secondary hypertension. In PA, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is more progressive than in any other cause of hypertension. Aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) are major subtypes of PA. However there is little information concerned with differences of cardiac structures between these two subtypes. METHODS: We reviewed echocardiographic findings in 46 patients with PA. All patients had a positive screen test and subtypes of PA were confirmed by adrenal vein sampling. Subjects consisted of 20 patients with APA (APA group, 52.4 ± 10.8 years) and 26 patients with IHA (IHA group, 56.2 ± 9.5 years). We investigated differences of cardiac structures and functions in the left atrium and ventricle between the APA group and IHA group. RESULTS: In terms of clinical characteristics, the height and duration of hypertension were greater and serum potassium concentration and BMI were lower in the APA group than in the IHA group. Plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and PAC to plasma renin activity ratio were higher in the APA group than in the IHA group. In echocardiographic assessment, the left atrial volume, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, left ventricular mass (LVM), and prevalence of LVH were greater in the APA group than in the IHA group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the diagnosis of APA independently correlated with left atrial volume, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and LVM. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that differences of cardiac structures between the APA group and IHA group existed. In APA, left atrial enlargement and LVH were more prominent than in IHA.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...