Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of TAS-108 in normal healthy post-menopausal female subjects: a phase I study on single oral dose.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of TAS-108 after ascending single oral doses and to analyse preliminarily the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of TAS-108 in normal healthy post-menopausal female subjects. METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects participated in an open-label, ascending single-dose, alternating group, safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic study of TAS-108 administered orally to two groups of the subjects, one given alternating doses of 10, 40, 120 mg (group A) and the other of 20, 80, 160 mg (group B), in the fasting state. In addition, six subjects (group A) were administered an additional dose at 120 mg TAS-108 after food consumption. Plasma and urine samples for measurement of TAS-108 were analysed by validated analytical procedures using a liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS). RESULTS: There was no dose-dependent increase in any adverse events (AEs), and there were no serious AEs or deaths. TAS-108 was readily absorbed following oral administration of the 80-, 120- and 160-mg doses. Plasma TAS-108 levels steadily declined, generally in a mono-exponential manner, with overall mean t(1/2) values ranging from 3.04 to 4.43 h in the fasting groups. Administration of TAS-108 after a high-fat meal markedly increased the bioavailability of the drug. The mean C(max) and AUC(0--t) values increased after a high-fat breakfast by 182 and 191% compared with the fasting value respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this escalating dose study of TAS-108, the drug was well tolerated by the participants. The maximum and systemic exposure to TAS-108 tended to increase with increasing dose and its bioavailability markedly increased after high-fat food intake.

Oral uracil and Ftorafur plus leucovorin: pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients with metastatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the pharmacokinetics of Ftorafur (tegafur, FT), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and uracil in 31 cancer patients who were enrolled in phase I studies of oral uracil and FT (UFT). The correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxic effects of UFT was evaluated. METHODS: Uracil and FT were orally administered in a 4:1 molar ratio at FT doses of 200-400 mg/m2 per day. Patients also received leucovorin at 150 mg/day. Daily doses were divided into three doses and administered at 8-h intervals for 28 consecutive days. Plasma FT concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and plasma 5-FU and uracil concentrations were determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. National Institutes of Health Common Toxicity Criteria were used for assessment of toxicity. RESULTS: The concentrations of FT, 5-FU, and uracil showed wide interpatient variations. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cp(max)) of all three compounds were achieved in 0.3 to 4.0 h. At the various study doses, the terminal half-life (t 1/2beta) of FT ranged from 3.9 to 5.9 h, the area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC0-6h) ranged from 16,220 to 52,446 (ng/ml)h, the total clearance (ClT) ranged from 100 to 175 ml/min, and the steady-state volume of distribution (Vd(ss)) ranged from 18.3 to 28.7 l. The 5-FU generated from FT had an apparent distribution half-life (t 1/2alpha) and an apparent elimination half-life (t 1/2beta) of 0.3-1.3 h and 4.9-7.0 h, respectively. The AUC0-6h of 5-FU ranged from 120 to 325 (ng/ml)h. Uracil had a t 1/2alpha of 0.2-0.5 h and the level quickly returned to the endogenous level. The AUC0-6h for uracil ranged from 605 to 3764 (ng/ml)h, the ClT ranged from 3225 to 7748 ml/min, and the Vd(ss) ranged from 341 to 1354 l. The Cp(max) and AUC0-6h of both FT and uracil were significantly correlated with FT doses (P-values of 0.0244 and 0.0112) and with uracil doses (P-values of 0.0346 and 0.0083), respectively. In addition to interpatient variations, intrapatient variations were also observed in six patients who had pharmacology studies done on days 1 and 26+/-2 at the same study dose. We found that the repeated treatment with UFT caused cumulative increases in the values of Cp(max), Ctrough, and AUC0-6h of FT and 5-FU. The major toxic effects observed were diarrhea and nausea and vomiting. The occurrence of these toxic effects correlated significantly with the Cp(max) and AUC0-6h of 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacology studies showed that FT and uracil were readily absorbed orally and that FT was rapidly converted to 5-FU. The preliminary findings suggest that determination of plasma levels of 5-FU after oral administration of UFT may help predict subsequent toxic effects.

Comparison of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics in patients receiving continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion and oral uracil plus N1-(2'-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil.

Plasma 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) levels were compared in the same patients after approximately equimolar doses (1.9 mmol/ m2/day) of 5-day continuous i.v. infusion of 5-FU (CIFU) and oral administration of a formulation of two combined pharmacological agents, uracil (U) plus N1-(2'-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (ftorafur or FT), a prodrug of 5-FU. Ten patients received CIFU for 5 days, then, after a week wash-out period, began the 28-day oral UFT regimen, which was given in three daily divided doses. Following 1 h of CIFU, the plasma 5-FU levels reached a steady state of 0.6+/-0.2 microM (mean+/-SD; day 1), which was maintained for the entire 5-day infusion period (0.6+/-0.1 microM). In contrast, the maximum 5-FU concentrations (Cpmax) generated from oral UFT at 1 h after dose administration on days 1 and 5 were 2.1+/-1.5 microM and 2.3+/-1.9 microM, respectively, which were higher than the steady-state levels during CIFU. These high 5-FU levels disappeared with an apparent elimination half-life (tl/2,beta) of 5.2+/-2.4 h (day 1) and 7.2+/-3.9 h (day 5). On day 1 of both regimens, CIFU patients had significantly larger 5-FU area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC0-8h) values (4.4+/-1.3 microM.h) than the AUC value when they received the UFT regimen (2.6+/-1.7 microM.h; P = 0.02). However, by day 5, there were no significant differences between AUC0-8 h values in patients receiving CIFU and UFT, respectively (4.8+/-1.5 microM.h versus 3.8+/-2.2 microM.h; P = 0.30)]. On day 5, the average concentration of the metabolite 5-FU at steady-state (Css,aver) within dose interval of 8 h (0.48+/-0.28 microM) for the oral UFT treatment is comparable with the Cpss values of 5-FU from CIFU-treated patients. The post-UFT generated 5-FU pharmacokinetic parameters (higher Cp(mx, comparable Css,aver, equal AUC values, and longer apparent t1/2,beta of 5-FU) may make oral UFT a preferred method of delivering this fluoropyrimidine over CIFU. In addition, oral UFT would eliminate the incidence of venous thrombosis and catheter-related infections sometimes seen in patients treated with CIFU. Furthermore, the convenience and decreased cost of oral administration may be preferable for many patients, particularly those receiving 5-FU for palliation.

Clinical pharmacology of combined oral uracil and ftorafur.

Phase I clinical trials of the combination of oral uracil with ftorafur (Ft) were conducted in patients with solid tumors over either a 5-day (345 mg/m2/day) or a 28-day (160 mg/m2/day) period. The uracil dose, which was four times the Ft dose (molar basis), was previously shown to be optimal at inhibiting the degradation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Pharmacology was performed on the first dose of the first day of therapy. Ft was measured by HPLC, whereas uracil and 5-FU were measured using GC/MS. Plasma levels were highest for Ft, followed by uracil and 5-FU at all time points. Peak and trough levels after selected subsequent doses were also measured; these varied in the individual from day to day. Maximum plasma levels (Cpmax) for Ft, uracil, and 5-FU except in one patient were achieved at 0.6-2.1 hr, 0.6-4.1 hr, and 0.7-2.0 hr, respectively. Generally, lower doses yielded more rapid decay of 5-FU and uracil levels than did higher doses. No correlation was observed between myelotoxicities (granulocytopenia and leukopenia) and the Cpmax and AUC0-6hr of Ft (p > 0.2). However, after the highest uracil and Ft dose (approximately 300 mg/m2/Ft study dose), the Cpmax and AUC0-6hr values of 5-FU revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in three patients each with and without myelotoxicity. These associations were similarly observed with uracil. Our findings thus indicate that measuring plasma uracil and more importantly, the 5-FU levels, may predict hematological toxicity and enable subsequent dose adjustments.