A prospective observational study on impact of epinephrine administration route on acute myocardial infarction patients with cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory (iCPR study).

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is routinely utilized in cardiac arrest; however, it is unclear if the route of administration affects outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients with cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of epinephrine administered via the peripheral intravenous (IV), central IV, and intracoronary (IC) routes. METHODS: Prospective two-center pilot cohort study of acute myocardial infarction patients who suffered cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory during percutaneous coronary intervention. We compared the outcomes of patients who received epinephrine via peripheral IV, central IV, or IC. RESULTS: 158 participants were enrolled, 48 (30.4%), 50 (31.6%), and 60 (38.0%) in the central IV, IC, and peripheral IV arms, respectively. Peripheral IV epinephrine administration route was associated with lower odds of achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC, odds ratio = 0.14, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.36, p < 0.0001) compared with central IV and IC administration. (There was no difference between central IV and IC routes; p = 0.9343.) The odds of stent thrombosis were significantly higher with the IC route (IC vs. peripheral IV OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 1.5-14.3, p = 0.0094; IC vs. central IV OR = 6.0, 95% CI = 1.9-19.2, p = 0.0025). Post-ROSC neurologic outcomes were better for central IV and IC routes when compared with peripheral IV. CONCLUSION: Epinephrine administration via central IV and IC routes was associated with a higher rate of ROSC and better neurologic outcomes compared with peripheral IV administration. IC administration was associated with a higher risk of stent thrombosis. Trial registration This trial is registered at NCT05253937 .

A comparison of risk scores' long-term predictive abilities for patients diagnosed with ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent early percutaneous coronary intervention.

Objective. To compare the long-term (5 year) prognostic values of commonly used risk scores on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a cohort of patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI. Design. We created a composite endpoint of MACE, defined as the occurrence of any of the following events within 5 years: ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, target vessel revascularization, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death. We dichotomized risk scores into high risk and not high risk according to the literature's pre-existing cutoffs as follows: GRACE score >127 = high risk, SYNTAX I score ≥33 = high risk, SYNTAX II ≥32 high risk, TIMI >8 = high risk. We utilized the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the metric for predictive ability. Results. There were 768 patients in this study and 416 (54.2%), 209 (27.2%), 511 (66.5%), and 74 (9.6%) were at high risk according to the GRACE, SYNTAX I, SYNTAX II, and TIMI scores, respectively. The AUCs for 5-year MACE were 0.54 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.59, p = .0947), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.83, p < .0001), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.54-0.62, p = .0004), and 0.5 (95% CI: 0.48-0.53, p = .7259), respectively. Conclusion. SYNTAX I score was superior in predicting MACE in patients with STEMI and a high burden of CAD. Utilizing the basal SYNTAX I score in STEMI patients with significant non-culprit CAD may improve risk stratification, decision-making, and outcomes.

Blood direct PCR: impact of CYP2C19 and CYP4F2 variants for bleeding prediction in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with ticagrelor.

Aims: The goals of this study were to develop a new technique that could pave the way for a quicker determination of CYP4F2 rs3093135 and CYP2C19 rs4244285 variants directly from a patient's blood and to attempt to apply this technique in clinical practice. Patients & methods: The study included 144 consecutive patients admitted with ST elevation myocardial infarction. A blood-direct PCR and real-time PCR were used to detect variants of interest. Results & conclusion: Patients with bleeding events had the CYP2C19 GG (*1*1) variant more frequently than patients without bleeding events. The CYP4F2 TT variant was more frequently detected in patients with bleeding events 3 months after hospitalization.

Ticagrelor is one of the main antiplatelet drugs used for prevention of coronary blood clots after interventional procedures in patients with acute coronary syndromes. It has previously been shown that gene variants of CYP2C19 and CYP4F2 may affect antiplatelet therapy. This paper reports a novel instrument and the results of genetic tests obtained using this instrument. Our instrument can detect variants of the genes associated with ticagrelor antiplatelet therapy in only 40 min. These findings might facilitate individualized treatment with ticagrelor of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.