Challenges faced by nurses engaged in rheumatology care in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the challenges faced by nurses engaged in rheumatology care in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey of nurses in Japan in 2020 on challenges experienced in rheumatology care. The participants were nurses certified by the Japan Rheumatism Foundation. Participants' answers were coded and categorized based on relevant phrases and words. Content analysis was performed on the findings. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 162 participants, and a total of 228 issues were identified. Eighteen categories with 56 subcategories emerged from the data analysis, which were grouped into five types of challenges: (1) communication, (2) understanding, (3) expertise, (4) system, and (5) collaboration. In particular, the results highlighted deficiencies in needs-based multidisciplinary team care. CONCLUSION: This study elucidated issues experienced by rheumatology nurses in clinical settings in Japan. Furthermore, this investigation revealed the necessity of patient-centered multidisciplinary team care, including health professionals, patients, and other relevant individuals. This study provided practical directions to facilitate the implementation of effective care focused on improving patients' quality of life.

Psychological support and patient-centered care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Nurses' opinions and practice in Japan.

AIM: To investigate nurses' opinions and practices regarding psychological support and patient-centered care (PCC) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHOD: Registered nurses engaged in rheumatic care in Japan were asked to complete the questionnaire regarding nurses' perceived necessity, understanding, and implementation of psychological support, and six patient supports related to PCC, using a seven-point Likert scale. Correlation on practice between psychological support and PCC was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 53 nurses participated. Nurses indicated high necessity of providing psychological support, whereas implementation was statistically significantly lower than necessity and motivation. Nurses' answers showed significantly lower implementation compared with understanding regarding basic concepts of psychological support: listening, empathy, acceptance, open questions, and closed questions. Most nurses (54.7%) sometimes provided psychological support, followed by often (34.0%), always (5.7%), and not at all (5.6%). Perceived necessity of PCC was rated high. However, its implementation was significantly lower than necessity for all evaluated cares, such as patients' need-based support and support to patients' families, related to PCC. Positive correlations were observed between the implementation of psychological support and PCC. Nurses stressed the importance of psychological support for patient education and shared decision-making. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study indicated that most nurses considered psychological support and PCC necessary, but their implementation was relatively low. As psychological support is also crucial to shared decision-making, in addition to PCC, barriers to its implementation should be addressed to improve patients' outcomes and quality of life.

Efficacy of a self-management education program for people with type 2 diabetes: results of a 12 month trial.

AIM: Patient education that enhances one's self-management ability is of utmost importance for improving patient outcomes in chronic diseases. We developed a 12 month self-management education program for type 2 diabetes, based on a previous 6 month program, and examined its efficacy. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was carried out on outpatients with type 2 diabetes from two hospitals who met the criteria and gave consent to participate. They were randomly divided into an intervention group that followed the program and a control group that followed usual clinical practise. The intervention group received <30 min of monthly interviews based on the program's textbook and biweekly telephone calls from a nurse educator throughout the 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 50 participants in the intervention group and the 25 participants in the control group, 42 and 23, respectively, completed the program (a completion rate of 84.0%). The body weight, HbA1c, self-efficacy, dietary and exercise stages, quality of life, diastolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol level were significant by two-way repeated-measures anova. As for changes over time within the groups, only the intervention group showed significant differences by Friedman's test. The complication prevention behaviors showed a high implementation rate in the intervention group. The overall evaluation of this program by the participants was very high and, therefore, they highly recognized the need for this type of program. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management education works successfully in relation to patients' behavior modification skills, degree of goal attainment, and self-efficacy, consequently improving their health outcomes.