Temperature Control After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the effect of hypothermic temperature control after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) on mortality and functional outcome as compared with normothermia. METHODS: An investigator initiated, open-label, blinded-outcome-assessor, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing hypothermic temperature control (32-34°C) for 24 h with normothermia after IHCA in 11 hospitals in Germany. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality after 180 days. Secondary end points included in-hospital mortality and favorable functional outcome using the Cerebral Performance Category scale after 180 days. A Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 was defined as a favorable functional outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1055 patients were screened for eligibility and 249 patients were randomized: 126 were assigned to hypothermic temperature control and 123 to normothermia. The mean age of the cohort was 72.6±10.4 years, 64% (152 of 236) were male, 73% (166 of 227) of cardiac arrests were witnessed, 25% (57 of 231) had an initial shockable rhythm, and time to return of spontaneous circulation was 16.4±10.5 minutes. Target temperature was reached within 4.2±2.8 hours after randomization in the hypothermic group and temperature was controlled for 48 hours at 37.0°±0.9°C in the normothermia group. Mortality by day 180 was 72.5% (87 of 120) in hypothermic temperature control arm, compared with 71.2% (84 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.79-1.40]; P=0.822). In-hospital mortality was 62.5% (75 of 120) in the hypothermic temperature control as compared with 57.6% (68 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.86-1.46, P=0.443). Favorable functional outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) by day 180 was 22.5% (27 of 120) in the hypothermic temperature control, compared with 23.7% (28 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.78-1.44]; P=0.822). The study was prematurely terminated because of futility. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermic temperature control as compared with normothermia did not improve survival nor functional outcome at day 180 in patients presenting with coma after IHCA. The HACA in-hospital trial (Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in-hospital) was underpowered and may have failed to detect clinically important differences between hypothermic temperature control and normothermia. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00457431.

A 56-Year-Old Woman with Chronic Hepatitis C Liver Disease and Meningitis due to Streptococcus equi subsp. Zooepidemicus.

Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus (S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus), which carries the Lancefield group C antigen, is an uncommon human pathogen. It is considered an opportunistic commensal of the equine upper respiratory tract and causes invasive infections in immunocompromised hosts, following close contact to infected horses. Meningitis caused by S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus is a rare infectious disease with high rates of complications. We present the case of a 56-year-old female with acutely altered mental status following three days of fever and vomiting. For several months, she was taking care of horses. The most relevant preexisting illnesses were chronic hepatitis C infection and traumatic paraplegia due to spinal cord injury 30 years ago. Laboratory evaluation on admission revealed leukocytosis, hyponatremia, and elevated C-reactive protein. Cerebral CT scan showed diffuse cerebral edema. Whereas cerebrospinal fluid real-time PCR assay for common pathogens was negative, cultures showed S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus. She recovered fully after intravenous administration of ceftriaxone for four weeks. This is one of only few reported cases of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus meningitis and the first case in chronic hepatitis C infection. Our case supports the necessity for extended microbiological examination especially in immunocompromised patients if PCR examination for common pathogens is negative.

Management of hypercalcaemia-induced heart failure using mechanical circulatory support.

Acute heart failure is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Heart failure is caused by various conditions, including electrolyte imbalances. We report a rare case of hypercalcaemia-induced acute heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock. Mechanical circulatory support was used successfully in this patient until calcium homeostasis was restored.

Serum microRNA-1233 is a specific biomarker for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) emerge as novel biomarkers in cardiovascular diseases. Diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains challenging due to a diverse clinical presentation and the lack of specific biomarkers. Here we evaluate serum miRNAs as potential biomarkers in acute PE. METHODS: We enrolled 30 patients with acute, CT (computed tomography)-angiographically confirmed central PE and collected serum samples on the day of emergency room admission (1st day) and from 22 of these patients 9 months thereafter. For comparison, we examined serum samples from patients with acute non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI, n = 30) and healthy individuals (n = 12). RESULTS: We randomly selected 16 out of 30 PE patients and screened sera from the acute (1st day) and chronic stages (9 months) for 754 miRNAs using microarrays and found 37 miRNAs to be differentially regulated. Across all miRNAs, miRNA-1233 displayed the highest fold change (FC) from acute to chronic stage (log2FC 11.5, p < 0.004). We validated miRNA-1233 by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). In acute PE (1st day) we found elevated levels of miRNA-1233 in comparison to NSTEMI (log2FC 5.7, p < 0.0001) and healthy controls (log2FC 7.7, p < 0.0001). miRNA-1233 differentiated acute PE from NSTEMI patients and healthy individuals with 90 and 90 % sensitivity, and 100 and 92 % specificity [area under the curve (AUC) 0.95, p < 0.001 and 0.91, p < 0.001], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report that identifies a miRNA that allows distinguishing acute PE from acute NSTEMI and healthy individuals with high specificity and sensitivity.

Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Balloon Angioplasty: Insights From the PEPCAD-DES Study (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent [DES] In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent Please Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty [PTCA] Catheter).

OBJECTIVES: The intention this PEPCAD-DES (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent [DES] In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent Please Paclitaxel Eluting Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty [PTCA] Catheter) study update was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty in patients with DES-ISR at 3 years. BACKGROUND: In the PEPCAD-DES trial late lumen loss and the need for repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR) was significantly reduced with PCB angioplasty compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in patients with drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR) at 6 months. We evaluated whether the clinical benefit of reduced TLR and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was maintained up to 3 years. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with DES-ISR in native coronary arteries with reference diameters ranging from 2.5 mm to 3.5 mm and lesion lengths ≤22 mm were randomized to treatment with either PCB or POBA in a multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical study. With a 2:1 randomization, 72 patients were randomized to the PCB group and 38 patients to the POBA group. At baseline, there were lesions with at least 2 stent layers in PCB (52.8%, 38 of 72) and POBA (55.3%, 21 of 38) patients. RESULTS: At 36 months, the TLR rates were significantly lower in the PCB group compared with the POBA control group (19.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.046). Multiple TLRs in individual patients were more frequent in the POBA group compared with the PCB group (more than 1 TLR: POBA, 13.2%; PCB, 1.4%; p = 0.021). The 36-month MACE rate was significantly reduced in the PCB group compared with the POBA group (20.8% vs. 52.6%, log-rank p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PCB angioplasty was superior to POBA for the treatment of DES-ISR patients in terms of MACE and TLR for up to 36 months. There was no late catch-up phenomenon. (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent [DES] In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent® Please Paclitaxel Eluting Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty [PTCA] Catheter [PEPCAD-DES]; NCT00998439).

Endeavour zotarolimus-eluting stent reduces stent thrombosis and improves clinical outcomes compared with cypher sirolimus-eluting stent: 4-year results of the PROTECT randomized trial.

AIMS: To compare the long-term clinical safety between two drug-eluting stents with different healing characteristics in the Patient Related Outcomes with Endeavour (E-ZES) vs. Cypher (C-SES) Stenting Trial (PROTECT). At 3 years, there was no difference in the primary outcome of definite or probable stent thrombosis or in the other main secondary clinical outcomes consisting of the composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI). Prespecified 4-year clinical follow-up was analysed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patient Related OuTcomes with Endeavour vs. Cypher Stenting Trial was a prospective, open-label randomized-controlled superiority trial powered to look at differences in long-term clinical safety, including stent thrombosis. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was prescribed for ≥ 3 months and up to 12 months based on current guidelines. Patient Related OuTcomes with Endeavour vs. Cypher Stenting Trial enrolled 8791 patients undergoing elective or emergency PCI to E-ZES or C-SES. There was no difference in DAPT usage between the two groups up to 4 years. At 4-year follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in 1.6% of E-ZES vs. 2.6% of C-SES patients [HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), P = 0.003]. The composite of all-cause death or large MI occurred in 6.7% of E-ZES vs. 8.0% of C-SES-treated patients [HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.98), P = 0.024]. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-eluting coronary stents with different healing characteristics demonstrated different late safety profiles: after 4 years, compared with C-SES, E-ZES reduced the risk of stent thrombosis and the risk of the composite endpoints of death or MI. Appropriately powered large-scale trials with long-term follow-up are critical to determine clinical safety and efficacy of permanently implanted coronary stents. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00476957.

24 hour ST segment analysis in transient left ventricular apical ballooning.

OBJECTIVE: The etiologic basis of transient left ventricular apical ballooning, a novel cardiac syndrome, is not clear. Among the proposed pathomechanisms is coronary vasospasm. Long-term ST segment analysis may detect vasospastic episodes but has not been reported. METHODS: 30 consecutive patients with transient left ventricular apical ballooning, left ventricular dysfunction and normal or near-normal coronary arteries were investigated. A 24-hour Holter ECG was obtained after emergency admission. ST segment analysis was performed automatically in 2 leads and confirmed by visual inspection. Criteria for an ischemic event were: 1. ST elevation or 2. horizontal or down-sloping ST segments ≥1 min duration and ≥100 µV J+80 point deviation corrected for baseline ST-deviation. RESULTS: Patients presented with ST segment elevation (n = 19) and/or T wave inversion (n = 20) on admission ECG. Ejection fraction was 50±12%. No transient ST elevations were observed during Holter ECG analysis. In 3 patients, 8 transient episodes of ST depression were recorded. Durations of episodes varied between 75 s and 790 s (mean 229 s). Maximal ST deviation averaged -191±71 µV. Ischemic burden was -1 to -22 mVs (mean -8 mVs). 27 patients showed no ischemic events. CONCLUSIONS: ST segment analysis of 24 h Holter recordings revealed minor ischemic events in only 10% of patients with transient left ventricular apical ballooning. Overall, ST segment changes were not indicative of recurrent coronary spasm playing a major role in the genesis of transient left ventricular apical ballooning.

Central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness during the finals of the world cup soccer championship 2010.

BACKGROUND: Emotional stress is considered a risk factor for cardiovascular events, the underlying pathophysiology remains unclear. METHODS: To evaluate how emotional stress effects hemodynamics, thirteen healthy German soccer fans (mean 37.6 years, 24-56 years) were studied during live TV coverage of the finals with German national team participation (GP) and the respective finals without German participation (noGP). Peripheral blood pressure, heart rate, central blood pressure, augmentation pressure and index, cardiac output and peripheral resistance were measured. RESULTS: In the 1st hour before the match all parameters were not significantly different between the groups. In the GP group peripheral systolic pressure (1st halftime noGP 118 ± 1(s.e.m) versus GP 126 ± 2 mmHg, p<0.05, 2nd 117 ± 1 vs. 125 ± 2 mmHg, p<0.05), mean blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate (1st 73 ± 2 vs. 86 ± 3 bpm, p<0.05, 2nd 75 ± 2 vs. 87 ± 2 bpm, p<0.05), cardiac output (1st 4,4 ± 0,1 versus 4,8 ± 0,1L/min, p<0.05, 2nd 4,6 ± 0,1 versus 4,7 ± 0,11 L/min, p>0.05) and peripheral resistance were significantly increased compared to the noGP group during the matches. Systolic central aortic pressure (noGP: 101 ± 2 versus GP 107 ± 2 mmHg, p<0.05) and central pulse pressure (noGP: 31.3 ± 1.3 mmHg vs. GP: 38.5 ± 2.7 mmHg, p<0,05) remained elevated during the second hour after the match. CONCLUSIONS: We observed persistent changes in central hemodynamics 2h after emotional stress. Despite normalization of peripheral values after the end of the finals, we observed prolonged elevation of central systolic blood and pulse pressure. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the increased risk of cardiovascular events in emotional stress.

Stent thrombosis and major clinical events at 3 years after zotarolimus-eluting or sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation: a randomised, multicentre, open-label, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare the long-term safety of two devices with different antiproliferative properties: the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES; Medtronic, Inc) and the Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (C-SES; Cordis, Johnson & Johnson) in a broad group of patients and lesions. METHODS: Between May 21, 2007 and Dec 22, 2008, we recruited 8791 patients from 36 recruiting countries to participate in this open-label, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older undergoing elective, unplanned, or emergency procedures in native coronary arteries. Patients were randomly assigned to either receive E-ZES and C-SES (ratio 1:1). Randomisation was stratified per centre with varying block sizes of four, six, or eight patients, and concealed with a central telephone-based or web-based allocation service. The primary outcome was definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3 years and was analysed by intention to treat. Patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00476957. FINDINGS: PROTECT randomised 8791 patients, of whom 8709 provided consent to participate and were eligible: 4357 were allocated to the E-ZES group and 4352 patients to the C-SES group. At 3 years, rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis did not differ between groups (1·4% for E-ZES [predicted: 1·5%] vs 1·8% [predicted: 2·5%] for C-SES; hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·58-1·14, p=0·22). Dual antiplatelet therapy was used in 8402 (96%) patients at discharge, 7456 (88%) at 1 year, 3041 (37%) at 2 years, and 2364 (30%) at 3 years. INTERPRETATION: No evidence of superiority of E-ZES compared with C-SES in definite or probable stent thrombosis rates was noted at 3 years. Time analysis suggests a difference in definite or probable stent thrombosis between groups is emerging over time, and a longer follow-up is therefore needed given the clinical relevance of stent thrombosis. FUNDING: Medtronic, Inc.

Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial.

BACKGROUND: In current guidelines, intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) is considered a class 1 indication in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, evidence is mainly based on retrospective or prospective registries with a lack of randomized clinical trials. Therefore, IABP is currently only used in 20% to 40% of cardiogenic shock cases. The hypothesis of this trial is that IABP in addition to early revascularization by either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting will improve clinical outcome of patients in cardiogenic shock. STUDY DESIGN: The IABP-SHOCK II study is a 600-patient, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of IABP versus optimal medical therapy on the background of early revascularization by either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to 1 of the 2 treatments. The primary efficacy end point of IABP-SHOCK II is 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures, such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters, will serve as surrogate end points for prognosis. Furthermore, an intermediate and long-term follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed. Safety will be assessed, by the GUSTO bleeding definition, peripheral ischemic complications, sepsis, and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The IABP-SHOCK II trial addresses important questions regarding the efficacy and safety of IABP in addition to early revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction.

A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis: the PEPCAD-DES study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define the impact of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty alone. BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty is associated with favorable results for treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis. METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind, multicenter, randomized trial, the authors randomly assigned 110 patients with drug-eluting stent restenoses located in a native coronary artery to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty or uncoated balloon angioplasty. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 6 months. Angiographic follow-up was scheduled at 6 months. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss. The secondary clinical endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, or target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: There was no difference in patient baseline characteristics or procedural results. Angiographic follow-up rate was 91%. Treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon was superior to balloon angioplasty alone with a late loss of 0.43 ± 0.61 mm versus 1.03 ± 0.77 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. Restenosis rate was significantly reduced from 58.1% to 17.2% (p < 0.001), and the composite clinical endpoint was significantly reduced from 50.0% to 16.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty is superior to balloon angioplasty alone for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. (PEPCAD DES-Treatment of DES-In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent® Please Paclitaxel Eluting PTCA Catheter [PEPCAD-DES]; NCT00998439).

Release patterns of copeptin and troponin in Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy.

Copeptin, in addition to troponin, has recently been suggested for non-invasive differentiation between Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In order to test this hypothesis, we investigated release patterns of pituitary copeptin and cardiac troponin in 49 patients with TTC and 49 age-, gender-, and ECG-matched control patients with AMI. Elevated copeptin levels (i.e. >12 pmol/l) at cardiac catheterization were found in 23/49 (47%) TTC patients and 25/49 (51%) AMI patients. Of these, median copeptin levels were almost identical in both cohorts (34.1 vs. 35.4 pmol/l). Subgroup analysis according to ECG changes revealed that AMI patients with ST-segment elevation had 3.6-fold higher copeptin levels than AMI patients without ST-segment elevation (p<0.05). Furthermore, in patients with TTC and atypical (midventricular) ballooning on left ventricular angiography, copeptin levels were 5.7-fold higher than in TTC patients with a typical (apical) type of ballooning (p<0.01). Elevated troponin T levels (i.e. >0.01 µg/l) at catheterization were detectable in 47/49 (96%) TTC patients and 45/49 (92%) AMI patients; however, peak levels did not differ significantly between both cohorts (median 0.35 vs. 0.27 µg/l). Subgroup analysis according to ECG changes revealed 2-fold higher peak troponin T levels in TTC patients presenting with ST-segment elevation than non-ST-segment elevation (p<0.05). In conclusion, copeptin does not seem to significantly increase non-invasive differentiation between TTC and AMI. At present, coronary angiography, specifically in patients with ST-segment elevation at presentation remains absolutely mandatory.

Lethal hemorrhage caused by aortoesophageal fistula secondary to stent-graft repair of the thoracic aorta.

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but life-threatening complication after endovascular or surgical aortic repair. Here we report a patient with AEF secondary to aortic stent-placement 2 years earlier who presented with hematemesis and died from hemorrhagic shock. By means of this case and the literature, we highlight potential bleeding sources in such a scenario because this is of crucial importance for the management strategy.

Drug eluting balloons for the treatment of coronary artery disease: What can we expect?

Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) represent an enhancement of the therapeutic repertoire for the interventional cardiologist. The therapeutic concept of DEBs is promising, notably on the basis of initial studies in patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). At present, however, a number of questions regarding long-term efficacy and safety remain, specifically in indications other than diffuse ISR. The results of the evaluation of different substances, balloon systems and clinical indications will determine the long-term success of DEBs.