Implementation of newly adopted technology in acute care settings: a qualitative analysis of clinical staff.

Technologies are not always successfully implemented into practice. This study elicited experiences of acute care providers with the introduction of technology and identified barriers and facilitators in the implementation process. A qualitative study using one-on-one interviews among a purposeful sample of 19 physicians and nurses within 10 emergency departments and intensive care units was performed. Grounded theory, iterative data analysis and the constant comparative method were used to inductively generate ideas and build theories. Five major categories emerged: decision-making factors, the impact on practice, technology's perceived value, facilitators and barriers to implementation. Barriers included negative experiences, age, infrequent use and access difficulties. A positive outlook, sufficient training, support staff and user friendliness were facilitators. This study describes strategies implicated in the successful implementation of newly adopted technology in acute care settings. Improved implementation methods and evaluation of implementation processes are necessary for successful adoption of new technology.

Experiences with capnography in acute care settings: a mixed-methods analysis of clinical staff.

PURPOSE: Although capnography is being incorporated into clinical guidelines, it is not used to its full potential. We investigated reasons for limited implementation of capnography in acute care areas and explored facilitators and barriers to its implementation. METHODS: A purposeful sample of physicians and nurses in emergency departments and intensive care units participated in semistructured interviews. Grounded theory, iterative data analysis, and the constant comparative method were used to analyze the data to inductively generate ideas and build theories. RESULTS: Nineteen providers were interviewed from 5 hospitals. Six themes were identified: variability in use of capnography among acute care units, availability and accessibility of capnography equipment, the evidence behind capnography use, the impact of capnography on patient care, personal experiences impacting use of capnography, and variable knowledge about capnography. Barriers and facilitators to use were found within each theme. CONCLUSIONS: We observed varied responsiveness to capnography and identified factors that work to foster or discourage its use. These data can guide future implementation strategies. A deliberate strategy to foster utilization, mitigate barriers, and broadly accelerate implementation has the potential to profoundly impact use of capnography in acute care areas with the goal of improving patient care.