Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Patient Exp ; 7(3): 372-379, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32821797

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate women's experiences after hysterectomy and predictors of their contentment and regret with the surgical approaches. METHODS: Cross-sectional, Patient-Reported Experience Measures survey in 2319 Australian women aged 21 to 90 years (median age of 52 years) who had received hysterectomy in the preceding 2 years. RESULTS: Overall, the vast majority of women (>96%) did not regret having had the hysterectomy. Women who received an open abdominal hysterectomy reported slower recovery with about 7% of women still not fully recovered after 12 months compared to those whose surgery was through a less invasive approach. Women who reported no adverse events, having been given a choice of type of hysterectomy, women who received an alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy, and women who felt prepared for discharge from hospital were significantly more likely to be content with their hysterectomy and report positive patient experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those who received a less invasive approach to hysterectomy, women who received open surgery were more likely to express negative experiences relating to their hospital stay and recovery from surgery. The results inform future improvements of care for women planning a hysterectomy.

2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 58(6): 690-695, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29763509

RESUMO

Minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy have been shown to be safe, effective and have recovery advantages over open hysterectomy, yet in Australia 36% of hysterectomies are still conducted by open surgery. In 2006, a survey of Australian gynaecological specialists found the main impediment to increasing laparoscopic hysterectomy to be a lack of surgical skills training opportunities. We resurveyed specialists to explore contemporary factors influencing surgeons' approaches to hysterectomy; 258 (estimated ~19%) provided analysable responses. Despite >50% of surveyed specialists wishing to practise laparoscopic hysterectomy in the future, lack of surgical skills, arising from the lack of training opportunities, remains the main impediment.


Assuntos
Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Competência Clínica , Educação Médica Continuada , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/educação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Patient Educ Couns ; 101(3): 504-510, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918105

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore factors influencing how well-informed women felt about hysterectomy, influences on their decision making, and on them receiving a less-invasive alternative to open surgery. METHODS: Online questionnaire, conducted in 2015-2016, of women who had received a hysterectomy in Australia, in the preceding two years. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 2319/6000 women (39% response). Most women (n=2225; 96%) felt well-informed about hysterectomy. Women were more aware of the open abdominal approach (n=1798; 77%), than of less-invasive vaginal (n=1552; 67%), laparoscopic (n=1540; 66%), laparoscopic-assisted (n=1303; 56%), and robotic approaches (n=289; 12%). Most women (n=1435; 62%) reported their gynaecologist was the most influential information source. Women who received information about hysterectomy from a GP (OR=1.47; 95% CI 1.15-1.90), or from a gynaecologist (OR=1.3; 95% CI 1.06-1.58), were more likely to feel better informed (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study is important because it helps clinicians, researchers and health policy makers to understand why many women still receive an open abdominal approach despite many learned societies recommending to avoid it if possible. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Additional information, or education about avoiding open abdominal approach where possible may lead to a greater number of women receiving less-invasive types of hysterectomy in the future.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Histerectomia/psicologia , Laparoscopia , Preferência do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Austrália , Feminino , Ginecologia , Humanos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...