Intertwined: What makes food and wine pairings appropriate?

This study sought to identify sensory attributes of appropriate food and wine pairings and relate them to balance, consumer liking, sensory complexity, and expected price. A descriptive analysis panel (n = 8) evaluated four Australian Shiraz wines along with four complex food samples, yielding 16 wine and food combinations. Based on the sensory profiles, distinct food and wine pairings (n = 6) were selected for consumer preference tests, comprising a real life, pseudo-three course meal with two wines. According to American consumers (n = 108), in the most appropriate pairings, flavour intensities increased and wine taste attributes changed in relation to individual components. Appropriate pairings positively correlated with liking, sensory complexity, and expected price to pay, and negatively with balance as a slight wine dominance was preferred. Pairings had an increase in liking and sensory complexity over the individual wine but not the food component. To account for individual variability, consumers were segmented by their liking of the pairing. Key drivers of successful pairings across consumer clusters were similar to the average consumer results, however, the preferred pairings differed by cluster. The findings suggest, the quality of food and wine pairings might be better measured with a combination of direct (dominance/balance, appropriateness of pairing) and indirect methods (sensory complexity, liking), instead of a single scale, and consumer segmentation may better account for the variability of results. The outcome of this study enhanced the understanding of the relationship between consumer behaviour and food and wine pairings.

A matter of place: Sensory and chemical characterisation of fine Australian Chardonnay and Shiraz wines of provenance.

Establishing a fine wine image through regional typicality has been of interest to New World wine producing countries like Australia, but previous research mainly involved unoaked experimental wines, which were not reflective of the retail wine market. The regional typicality of commercially available fine Australian wines (FAW) was therefore explored, based on the hypotheses that sensory and chemical composition of varietal fine wines would discriminate by region, and further nuances within region would be explained by drivers of intraregional typicality. Chardonnay wines (2015 vintage) from Margaret River (MR, n = 16) and Yarra Valley (YV, n = 16); and Shiraz wines (2014 vintage) from Barossa Valley (BV, n = 16) and McLaren Vale (MV = 15), were selected for descriptive sensory analysis and underwent profiling of volatiles by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). For both grape varieties, there was large variability in wine styles among wines from the same GI, such as fruity/crisp vs oaked Chardonnay and oaky/astringent vs savoury Shiraz. Consequently, human intervention seemed to be an important component of regional/sub-regional typicality, which therefore cannot be determined solely on geographic origin of the fruit. Using a combination of sensory markers and volatile profiles allowed the building of regional typicality models, which are promising, however, consumers may not perceive sub-regional differences based on sensory attributes. Undoubtedly, variation of wine styles emerging across wine regions, vintages, and viticultural and winemaking practices needs to be further explored, but this work created a preliminary sensory and volatile map for future research.