Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 12(2): 159-61, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24702148

RESUMO

In living-donor liver transplant, hepatic venous anomalies are not rare. Despite numerous techniques developed over the years, the best way of establishing a patent and durable hepatic drainage system remains controversial. We present a case where we successfully reconstructed 5 hepatic venous structures with a combination of direct anastomosis and saphenous vein interposition. Careful planning before surgery, and a customized approach for the patient on the back table, brought about successful results.


Assuntos
Veias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Doadores Vivos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Veia Safena/transplante , Enxerto Vascular , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Autoenxertos , Feminino , Veias Hepáticas/anormalidades , Veias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Hepatite B/complicações , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/virologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Flebografia/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
World J Surg ; 28(7): 662-5, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15184999

RESUMO

Postoperative adhesions (PAs) are usually clinically asymptomatic. Symptomatic cases, however, may present with chronic abdominal and pelvic pain, infertility, and intestinal obstruction; and they may require intensive, costly therapeutic modalities. Various agents have been used to prevent PAs, but the results indicate general suboptimal effectiveness. Our objective was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of two pharmacologic agents for preventing PA: nadroparine calcium (low-molecular-weight heparin, or LMWH) and aprotinin, as well as a barrier agent, sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethycellulose (SCMC). Our subjects were 40 male Wistar-Albino rats divided into four groups, each consisting of 10 rats, which underwent standard cecal abrasion preceding midline laparotomy. In the control group (group 1) 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl was administered intraperitoneally before abdominal closure. In the three preventive groups, 100 U AXa (anti factor X activity) LMWH, 1800 IU aprotinin, and SCMC were administered intraperitoneally to groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Relaparotomy was performed on the 14th postoperative day. Visceral and abdominal wall adhesions were scored in a blinded fashion. The adhesion scores (mean +/- SD) for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 2.00 +/- 0.67, 0.6.00 +/- 0.84, 1.10 +/- 0.74, and 0.20 +/- 0.42, respectively. The differences in the adhesion scores among all three preventive groups (groups 2, 3, 4) were statistically significant when compared with the control group ( p < 0.001, p = 0.017, p < 0.001, respectively). Intraperitoneal SCMC and administration of LMWH were more effective than giving aprotinin.


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Aprotinina/administração & dosagem , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Membranas Artificiais , Nadroparina/administração & dosagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Animais , Carboximetilcelulose Sódica , Ácido Hialurônico , Masculino , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia , Aderências Teciduais/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...