Influence of Deceased Donor and Pretransplant Recipient Parameters on Early Overall Kidney Graft-Survival in Germany.

Background. Scarcity of grafts for kidney transplantation (KTX) caused an increased consideration of deceased donors with substantial risk factors. There is no agreement on which ones are detrimental for overall graft-survival. Therefore, we investigated in a nationwide multicentre study the impact of donor and recipient related risks known before KTX on graft-survival based on the original data used for allocation and graft acceptance. Methods. A nationwide deidentified multicenter study-database was created of data concerning kidneys donated and transplanted in Germany between 2006 and 2008 as provided by the national organ procurement organization (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation) and BQS Institute. Multiple Cox regression (significance level 5%, hazard ratio [95% CI]) was conducted (n = 4411, isolated KTX). Results. Risk factors associated with graft-survival were donor age (1.020 [1.013-1.027] per year), donor size (0.985 [0.977-0.993] per cm), donor's creatinine at admission (1.002 [1.001-1.004] per µmol/L), donor treatment with catecholamine (0.757 [0.635-0.901]), and reduced graft-quality at procurement (1.549 [1.217-1.973]), as well as recipient age (1.012 [1.003-1.021] per year), actual panel reactive antibodies (1.007 [1.002-1.011] per percent), retransplantation (1.850 [1.484-2.306]), recipient's cardiovascular comorbidity (1.436 [1.212-1.701]), and use of IL2-receptor antibodies for induction (0.741 [0.619-0.887]). Conclusion. Some donor characteristics persist to impact graft-survival (e.g., age) while the effect of others could be mitigated by elaborate donor-recipient match and care.

The joint impact of donor and recipient parameters on the outcome of heart transplantation in Germany after graft allocation.

Organ shortage in heart transplantation (HTx) results in increased use of grafts from donors with substantial risk factors. It is discussed controversially which donor characteristics may be detrimental. Therefore, we evaluated the joint impact of donor- and patient-related risk factors in HTx on patient survival by multiple analysis in a nationwide multicentre study after donor selection was carried out. The research database consists of data concerning hearts donated and transplanted in Germany between 2006 and 2008 as provided by Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation and the BQS Institute. Multiple Cox regression (significance level 5%, hazard ratio [95% CI]) was conducted (n = 774, recipient age ≥ 18 years). Survival was significantly decreased by donor age (1.021 [1.008-1.035] per year), nontraumatic cause of death (1.481 [1.079-2.034]), troponin >0.1 ng/ml (2.075 [1.473-2.921]), ischaemia time (1.197 [1.041-1.373] per hour), recipient age (1.017 [1.002-1.031] per year) and in recipients with pulmonary vascular resistance ≥ 320 dyn*s*cm(-5) (1.761 [1.115-2.781]), with ventilator dependency (3.174 [2.211-6.340]) or complex previous heart surgery (1.763 [1.270-2.449]). After donor selection had been conducted, multiple Cox regression revealed donor age, nontraumatic cause of death, troponin and ischaemia time as well as recipient age, pulmonary hypertension, ventilator dependency and previous complex heart surgery as limiting risk factors concerning patient survival.

The care of preterm infants with birth weight below 1250 g: risk-adjusted quality benchmarking as part of validating a caseload-based management system.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, controversy currently surrounds the contention that the quality of care for preterm infants weighing less than 1250 g is best assured by requiring that centers treat a minimum of 30 such cases per year. METHODS: A risk-adjusted model was developed on the basis of neonatal data from 7405 preterm infants treated in German centers, and the effect of caseload on risk-adjusted mortality was analyzed. In addition, the discriminative ability of the minimal caseload requirement for quality assessment was studied. The authors designate the quality of care in a particular center as above average if the observed mortality is lower than would have been expected from the risk profile of the preterm infants treated there. RESULTS: Risk-adjusted mortality was found to be significantly higher in smaller centers (those with fewer than 30 cases per year) than in larger ones (odds ratio, 1.34). Even among centers whose caseload exceeded the minimum requirement, there was still marked variability in risk-adjusted mortality (range: 3.5% to 28.6%). Of all the preterm infants treated in larger centers, 56% were treated in centers with above-average quality of care. 44% of the centers with above-average quality of care had caseloads in the range of 14 to 29 cases per year. CONCLUSION: Because of the marked variability in risk-adjusted mortality, even among larger centers, a caseload of 30 or more cases per year is not a suitable indicator of the quality of care. The neonatal data of external quality assurance should be used to develop an instrument for quality-based coordination of care that takes not just morbidity and mortality, but also the treating centers' competence profiles into account.

Inequalities in therapeutic treatment during cardiac inpatient rehabilitation in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac patients of low socio-economic status (SES) display low health status and increased need for rehabilitation. This study's objective was to examine whether and to what extent inequalities in the provision of rehabilitative health care occur in Germany. METHODS: We conducted an observational study with two points of measurement on 543 patients in cardiac inpatient rehabilitation. We used logistic regression and analysis of covariance to explore whether patients experience unequal therapeutic rehabilitative treatment. RESULTS: Patients of low SES were less frequently physically active, more likely to smoke and displayed a higher number of physical and psychological symptoms when entering rehabilitation. They were less likely to receive a number of therapies with differences being significant for core therapies of cardiovascular rehabilitation. Patients of higher SES received fewer hours of dietary counselling on average. CONCLUSIONS: While the latter difference might be in line with the needs of different socio-economic groups, most differences are unlikely to be tailored to patients' needs. Potential causes of inequalities in service provision like structural factors and aspects of the doctor-patient encounter should be further investigated.

Joint impact of donor and recipient parameters on the outcome of liver transplantation in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of donor organs in Germany has led to the use of organs from donors with extended donor criteria (EDC). EDC have been defined on the basis of expert opinions, but their clinical relevance is controversial. This may cause loss of organs otherwise available for transplantation. We evaluated the impact of donor and recipient factors in liver transplants on patient and graft survival in a nationwide multicenter analysis, with special focus on EDC and donor risk index. METHODS: A database was created from data on livers donated and transplanted in Germany between 2006 and 2008 as provided by Deutsche Stiftung Organ transplantation and BQS Institute. Cox regression (significance level 5%, risk ratio [95% confidence interval]) was used for calculating the impact on patient survival (n=2095) and on graft survival (n=2175). RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were significantly affected only by donor age (1.012 and 1.011/year), recipient age (1.019 and 1.014/year), creatinine (1.248 and 1.205/mg/dL), bilirubin (1.022 and 1.023/mg/dL), and high urgency status (1.783 and 1.809). Inferior organ quality resulted in lower graft survival (1.243) and donor history of smoking in lower patient survival (1.249). CONCLUSION: Multiple Cox regression revealed no significant impact of EDC or donor risk index on patient and graft survival except for donor age after donor selection at recovery. Among recipient variables, only age, creatinine and bilirubin, and high urgency status were associated with poorer outcome.

Stillbirth differences according to regions of origin: an analysis of the German perinatal database, 2004-2007.

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth is a sensitive indicator for access to, and quality of health care and social services in a society. If a particular population group e.g. migrants experiences higher rates of stillbirth, this might be an indication of social deprivation or barriers to health care. This study examines differences in risk of stillbirth for women of different regions of origin compared to women from Germany in order to identify high risk groups/target groups for prevention strategies. METHODS: We used the BQS dataset routinely compiled to examine perinatal outcomes in Germany nationwide. Participation of hospitals and completeness of data has been about 98% in recent years. Data on all live births and stillbirths were obtained for the period 2004 to 2007 (N = 2,670,048). We calculated crude and stratified mortality rates as well as corresponding relative mortality risks. RESULTS: A significantly elevated stillbirth rate was found for women from the Middle East and North Africa (incl. Turkey) (RR 1.34, CI 1.22-1.55). The risk was slightly attenuated for low SES. An elevated risk was also found for women from Asia (RR 1.18, CI 1.02-1.65) and from Mediterranean countries (RR 1.14, CI 0.93-1.28). No considerable differences either in use and timing of antenatal care or preterm birth and low birthweight were observed between migrant and non-migrant women. After stratification for light for gestational age, the relative risk of stillbirth for women from the Middle East/North Africa increased to 1.63 (95% CI 1.25-2.13). When adjusted for preterm births with low birthweight, women from Eastern Europe and the Middle East/North Africa experienced a 26% (43%) higher risk compared with women from Germany. CONCLUSIONS: We found differences in risk of stillbirth among women from Middle East/North Africa, especially in association with low SES and low birthweight for gestational age. Our findings suggest a need for developing and evaluating socially and culturally sensitive health promotion and prevention programmes for this group. The findings should also stimulate discussion about the quality and appropriateness of antenatal and perinatal care of pregnant women and newborns with migrant backgrounds.

Methodological considerations concerning the development of oral dental erosion indexes: literature survey, validity and reliability.

Within the context of preventing non-communicable diseases, the World Health Report (2002) and the WHO Global Oral Health Program (2003) put forward a new strategy of disease prevention and health promotion. Greater emphasis is placed on developing global policies in oral health promotion and oral disease prevention. The Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) index does not meet new challenges in the field of oral health. Dental erosion seems to be a growing problem, and in some countries, an increase in erosion of teeth is associated with an increase in the consumption of beverages containing acids. Therefore, within a revision of the WHO Oral Health Surveys Basic Methods, new oral disease patterns, e.g. dental erosion, have to be taken into account. Within the last 20 years, many studies on dental erosion have been carried out and published. There has been a rapid growth in the number of indexes quantifying dental erosion process in different age groups. However, these indexes are not comparable. This article discusses quality criteria which an index intended for assessing tooth erosion should possess.