Continuous interferon-α2b infusion in combination with ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in treatment-experienced patients.

BACKGROUND: Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in previous non-responders to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-α and ribavirin for chronic HCV remain low (~10%). We hypothesize that continuous subcutaneous delivery of fully potent interferon (IFN)-α2b via an external pump will lead to stable blood concentrations and thereby prevent subtherapeutic trough levels associated with viral breakthrough. The aims of the study were to assess safety, tolerability and virological response in patients who were previous PEG-IFN-α/ribavirin non-responders. METHODS: We randomized 30 HCV genotype 1 (n=24) and genotype 4 (n=6) patients to receive 6, 9 or 12 million units (MU) IFN-α2b daily by continuous subcutaneous administration using an insulin pump (MiniMed(®) 508; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) in combination with ribavirin (1,000-1,600 mg) for 48 weeks. RESULTS: The magnitude of viral decline in the 12 MU group after 4 weeks of treatment was 2.67 log HCV RNA compared with 1.21 and 1.27 log HCV RNA in the 9 and 6 MU groups, respectively (P=0.001). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the SVR rate was 20% (6/30). The per-protocol SVR rate was 25% (6/24), of which four out of six patients in the high-dose arm achieved SVR. Adverse events appeared dose-dependent, were mostly mild-to-moderate and were typical of IFN therapy. Five patients developed irritation and/or abscesses at the injection site. Six serious adverse events were reported in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous delivery of IFN-α2b can induce a strong dose-dependent viral suppression. This could be an effective approach in conjunction with, or as lead-in therapy prior to, treatment with a direct antiviral agent.

Variation in the CYP2D6 gene is associated with a lower serum sodium concentration in patients on antidepressants.

AIM: To study the effect of the CYP2D6*4 polymorphism on serum sodium concentration in users of antidepressants [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)]. METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, all subjects in the Rotterdam Study were included who used an antidepressant at baseline and from whom a blood sample was available in which CYP2D6 genotype and serum sodium concentration could be determined (n= 76). Multivariate linear regression was used to study the association between CYP2D6*4 and serum sodium concentration. RESULTS: CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs) (*4/*4) had a significantly lower mean serum sodium concentration in comparison with CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) (*1/*1) [difference -3.9 mmol l(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.86, -7.03; P= 0.013]. In CYP2D6*4 heterozygotes (*1/*4) serum sodium concentration was 1.7 mmol l(-1) (95% CI -3.48, 0.18) lower compared with CYP2D6 EMs, but this difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: The serum sodium concentration in PMs was lower in users of an antidepressant, especially in TCA users. Therefore CYP2D6 PMs might be at increased risk of developing symptoms of hyponatraemia.