Is ulnar shortening osteotomy effective for the treatment of ulnar styloid impaction syndrome compared to ulnar impaction syndrome?

PURPOSE: This study aimed at evaluating the outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) for the treatment of ulnar styloid impaction syndrome (USIS) and to compare them with those of USO for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS). METHODS: We enrolled 144 patients who underwent USO between March 2015 and October 2021. The patients were divided into a UIS group (group I, n = 93) and a USIS group (group II, n = 51). Clinical and radiological parameters, including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, ulnar variance, ulnar styloid length, and ulnar styloid process index (USPI), were collected pre-operatively and one year post-operatively, and a comparative analysis was performed. RESULTS: The DASH score showed significant improvement in both groups (p < .001 and p < .001), and there was no significant difference between the two groups one year after surgery (p = .143). The USPI was significantly different between the two groups (p < .001). The ulno-lunate and ulno-triquetrum distances showed significant increases in both groups, with significant differences between the two groups (p = .020, and p < .001, respectively). The incidence of post-operative arthritic changes in the distal radioulnar joint was significantly greater in the UIS group than that in the USIS group (21 vs 3, respectively; p = .017). No remarkable differences were observed in the post-operative evidence of chondromalacia at the last follow-up between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The USO, which was performed as a treatment for USIS showed reliable outcomes compared to the USO for the treatment of UIS. Therefore, USO is a viable option for the treatment of USIS.

Anterior cable reconstruction using the proximal biceps tendon for reinforcement of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair prevent retear and increase acromiohumeral distance.

Anterior cable reconstruction (ACR) using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) was developed to place at the native superior capsule attachment site for large to massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs) with anterior cable disruption. In this study, we investigated whether ACR for reinforcement before ARCR prevented retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), especially in cases of LMRCTs with anterior cable disruption. A total of 125 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for LMRCTs were retrospectively enrolled. To assess the benefit of ACR with LHBT, all data were compared with those after ARCR alone. As a result, ACR with LHBT showed satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes in comparison with conventional ARCR only technique. ACR with LHBT prevented retear after ARCR and improved the AHD, although There was no difference of clinical outcomes between two groups.

Efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing unstable ligament injuries around the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint: A comparison to arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of MRI in identifying ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), radial collateral ligament (RCL), and volar plate (VP) injuries of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) of the thumb by comparing with diagnostic arthroscopy. METHODS: A total of 56 consecutive patients (56 thumbs) who underwent arthroscopy of MCPJ of thumb were enrolled. MRI findings reviewed by consensus reading of two blinded radiologists were compared with arthroscopic examination. Statistical data, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, were analyzed. Additionally, the performance characteristics between 3.0-tesla (39 thumbs) and 1.5-tesla (17 thumbs) MRI and acute (≤4 weeks after injury) and chronic (>4 weeks) injuries were compared. RESULTS: Of the 56 thumbs, 38 thumbs (67.9%) showed complete correspondence between MRI and arthroscopic findings. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI for detecting UCL injuries were 78.8%, 87.0%, and 82.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI for detecting RCL injuries were 85.7%, 91.4%, and 85.7%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI for detecting VP injuries were 89.5%, 89.2%, and 81.0%, respectively. 3.0-tesla MRI showed higher correspondence with arthroscopic observation (76.9%) than 1.5-tesla MRI (47.1%) (p = 0.028). For acute injuries, 78.4% showed complete correspondence between MRI and arthroscopic findings, whereas 47.4% with chronic injuries revealed complete agreement (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Overall, MRI is moderately effective in evaluating ligamentous lesions around MCPJ of thumb, but MRI is more sensitive in diagnosing acute injuries. Furthermore, 3.0-tesla MRI can provide results with better accuracy for diagnosing ligamentous lesions around MCPJ of thumb. However, the sensitivity and the specificity are not applicable to all ligament injuries, but only the severe one which would agree for surgical options.

Comparative analysis of a locking plate with an all-suture anchor versus hook plate fixation of Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures.

BACKGROUND: The coracoclavicular fixation with suture anchors adds stability to type IIb distal clavicle fractures fixed with a plate and screws when loaded to failure. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between the use of a locking compression plate (LCP) with all-suture anchor fixation and hook LCP fixation of Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: A total of 82 consecutive patients who underwent plate fixation for Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures were included. The subjects were divided into two groups: an LCP with all-suture anchor fixation group and hook LCP fixation group. For clinical assessments, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Korean shoulder score (KSS), and Constant score were recorded. A percentage of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD%) was used to evaluate fracture reduction. Typical reported complications, such as secondary dislocation, implant failure or loosening, peri-implant fracture, acromion osteolysis, stiffness, peri-anchor osteolysis, postoperative acromioclavicular joint arthrosis, nonunion, or delayed union, were also analyzed. RESULTS: There were no differences in the clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up between the two groups. The period for bone union and CCD% showed no significant differences between groups. Stiffness at 3 months after surgery of LCP with all-suture anchor fixation (n = 3, 10.7%) was less than that of hook LCP fixation (n = 17, 31.5%). The complication rate also showed no significant differences between groups. However, LCP with all-suture anchor fixation had anchor-related complications, although it can reduce hook-related complications. CONCLUSION: LCP with all-suture anchor fixation showed satisfactory outcomes in comparison with hook LCP fixation. In Neer IIb distal clavicle fractures, LCP with all-suture anchor fixation is a useful method for the maintenance of reduction, avoiding implant removal, and hook-related complications. However, anchor fixation should be carefully used, especially in osteoporotic patients or patients with underlying diseases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective study.

New predictors for subscapularis tear: Coraco-lesser tuberosity angle, lesser tuberosity angle, and lesser tuberosity height.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of degenerative subscapularis (SC) tear is not clear, several mechanisms are involved: intrinsic tendon degeneration or subcoracoid impingement. The aim of this study was to propose new radiographic markers, the coraco-lesser tuberosity angle (CLA), lesser tuberosity angle (LTA) and lesser tuberosity height (LTH). The hypothesis was that higher values of CLA, LTA, and LTH would be associated with a higher likelihood in detecting a SC tear. METHOD: A total of 114 patients who classified as SC tears through arthroscopic evaluation were retrospectively enrolled in the study from 2016 to 2018. Fifty-seven patients with impingement syndrome were also enrolled as the control group for normal-population comparison. The CLA was measured on an anteroposterior shoulder x-ray image with the arm in neutral rotation, the LTA and LTH were measured on magnetic resonance imaging. Multivariable analyses were used to clarify the potential risks for SC tears. All measurements were calculated by two shoulder surgeons independently measured at 2 different times, 1 month apart. RESULTS: The intra- and inter-observer reliabilities for radiologic measurements and the interobserver reliability of SC tear classification were almost perfect. The mean CLA value of SC tear group (41.4±4.2°) was significantly larger than that of the control group (38.7±4.0°, p<0.001). The mean LTA value of SC tear group (33.4±4.3°) was significantly larger than that of the control group (31.0±3.9°, p=0.001). Mean LTH value was 9.5±1.9mm in patients and 8.9±1.5mm for controls, there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.054). Multivariable analysis showed that larger CLAs significantly increased the risk of SC tears, with odds ratios of 1.17 per degree. Moreover, larger LTAs also significantly increased the risk of SC tears, with odds ratios of 1.14 per degree. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirmed associations between new predictors (CLA and LTA) and SC tears. CLA and LTA values were greater in patients with SC tears than in controls, suggesting that they may be independent risk factors for SC tear onset. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.