Resource Use and Costs of Indwelling Pleural Catheters versus Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Population-based Study.

Rationale: Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) are associated with significant health service use and healthcare costs, but the current evidence is limited. Objectives: To compare 12-month post-procedure: 1) health service utilization; and 2) healthcare costs after indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion with at-home drainage performed by home care nursing services, versus in-hospital chemical pleurodesis. Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based study on a cohort of adults with MPEs who underwent IPC insertion or chemical pleurodesis between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 using provincial health administrative data (Ontario, Canada). Patients were followed from the procedure date until death or until 12 months after the procedure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to adjust for imbalances in baseline characteristics. Differences in length of stay, readmissions, emergency department visits, home care visits, and healthcare costs were estimated using weighted regression analysis. Results: Of 5,752 included individuals, 4,432 (77%) underwent IPC insertion and 1,320 (23%) had pleurodesis. In the weighted sample, individuals who received an IPC had fewer inpatient days (12.4 d vs. 16 d; standardized mean difference, 0.229) but a higher proportion of subsequent admissions for empyema (2.7% vs. 1.1%; P = 0.0002) than those undergoing pleurodesis. Individuals with IPCs received more hours of nursing home care (41 h vs. 21.1 h; standardized mean difference, 0.671) but overall had lower average healthcare costs ($40,179 vs. $46,640 per patient; standardized mean difference, 0.177) than those receiving pleurodesis. Conclusions: IPCs with home nursing drainage are associated with reduced health resource use compared with pleurodesis in adults with MPEs, even after controlling for important baseline and clinical characteristics. Given that both procedures have similar health outcomes, our findings support the ongoing promotion of IPCs to increase outpatient management of patients with MPEs.

Patient perspectives on the use of indwelling pleural catheters in malignant pleural effusions.

BACKGROUND: Indwelling pleural catheters are an effective treatment option for patients with malignant pleural effusions. Despite their popularity, there remains a paucity of data on the patient experience and key patient-centred outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the experience of patients receiving an indwelling pleural catheter to better inform and identify potential areas for improvement in care. METHODS: This was a multicentre survey study at three academic, tertiary-care centres in Canada. Patients with a diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion who had an indwelling pleural catheter inserted were included. An adapted questionnaire specific to indwelling pleural catheters was used with responses recorded on a 4-point Likert scale. Patients completed the questionnaire in-person or by phone at 2-week and 3-month follow-up appointments. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were enrolled in the study with 84 patients included in the final analysis. At the 2-week follow-up, patient-reported improvements in dyspnoea and quality of life from indwelling pleural catheter were high at 93% and 87%, respectively. The predominant issues identified were discomfort at time of insertion (58%), itching (49%), difficulty with sleeping (39%), discomfort with home drainage (36%) and the pleural catheter reminding patients of their disease (63%). Avoiding hospitalisation for the management of dyspnoea was important to 95% of patients. Findings were similar at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Indwelling pleural catheters are an effective intervention to directly improve dyspnoea and quality of life but have important disadvantages for some; clinicians and patients should be aware of these when making an informed decision regarding treatment.

Outcomes for Malignant Pleural Effusions Because of Melanoma Treated With Indwelling Pleural Catheters.

BACKGROUND: Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) reduce dyspnea and improve quality of life in patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). Data on outcomes of MPEs secondary to metastatic melanoma managed with IPCs are scarce. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of patients receiving IPCs for MPEs secondary to melanoma compared with other malignancies. METHODS: We identified patients from our prospectively collected database of all patients who had an IPC insertion for MPEs at our tertiary care center for melanoma between May 2006 and November 2018 and for nonmelanoma between May 2006 and June 2013. Chart reviews were conducted to obtain patient demographics, catheter complications, time of IPC removal or death, x-ray imaging, and pleural fluid characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 27 MPEs because of melanoma and 1114 because of nonmelanoma malignancies treated with IPC. The most frequent complication was pleural fluid loculation requiring fibrinolytics which was significantly higher in the melanoma (14.8%) compared with the nonmelanoma group (3.8%; P =0.02). Cumulative incidence functions for catheter removal ( P =0.8) or death with catheter in situ ( P =0.3) were not significant between melanoma and nonmelanoma groups in competing risk analysis. Baseline radiographic pleural effusion scores were similar, but became significantly higher (increased pleural opacity) in the melanoma group at time points following IPC insertion ( P <0.05). CONCLUSION: MPEs because of melanoma had a higher rate of loculations requiring fibrinolytics and less radiographic improvement after IPC insertion suggesting this patient subgroup has a more complicated pleural space which may be less responsive to drainage.

Nurse-led telehealth interventions for symptom management in patients with cancer receiving systemic or radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Patients receiving cancer treatments experience many treatment-related symptoms. Telehealth is increasingly being used to support symptom management. The overall aim was to determine the effectiveness of nurse-led telehealth symptom management interventions for patients with cancer receiving systemic or radiation therapy compared to usual care on health service use, quality of life, and symptom severity. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA reporting guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched. Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data. Meta-analysis was performed if data were clinically and methodologically homogeneous. Subanalysis was conducted on reactive and scheduled telehealth interventions. RESULTS: Of 7749 citations screened, 10 studies were included (8 randomized control trials, 2 quasi-experimental). Five were reactive telehealth interventions with patient-initiated contact and five evaluated scheduled telehealth interventions initiated by nurses. Compared to usual care (typically patient-initiated calls), nurse-led telehealth interventions for symptom management showed no statistically significant difference in hospitalizations, emergency department visits, or unscheduled clinic visits. Two of three studies of reactive telehealth interventions showed improved quality of life. All telehealth interventions showed reduction in the severity of most symptoms. Pain severity was significantly reduced (standard mean difference - 0.54; 95% CI - 0.88, - 0.19). Significant heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis for most outcomes. CONCLUSION: Few studies evaluated nurse-led telehealth interventions for cancer symptom management. Compared to usual care, patients exposed to telehealth interventions had reduced symptom severity and no difference in health services use. Future research should focus on better reporting intervention characteristics and consistently measuring outcomes.

Implementation of Ontario's emergency department asthma care pathway for adults: determinants of uptake.

OBJECTIVE: The Ontario Government funded the development and implementation of a standardized adult emergency department (ED) asthma care pathway (EDACP). We aimed to describe baseline patterns of ED use by adults for asthma in Ontario, Canada, and determine site characteristics associated with the EDACP implementation workshop attendance and subsequent pathway implementation. METHODS: All Ontario EDs were offered EDACP implementation workshops by the Lung Assocation-Ontario between 2008 and 2011, and were surveyed regarding site implementation status as of October, 2013. Survey data were linked by site to Ontario's administrative health databases. Logistic regression models investigated the association between site and patient characteristics and: a) workshop attendance; b) pathway implementation. RESULTS: In the 2 years prior to EDACP implementation, there were 41 143 asthma visits to 167 sites by adults (62.3% female). Asthma-related return visits within 72 h varied by hospital type (teaching 2.1%, community 2.8%, small 4.0%; p < 0.05). Implementation workshops were attended by staff from 122 sites (72.6%). Implementation status was known for 108 sites and varied by hospital type (p < 0.001), but not workshop attendance (p = 0.11). By 2013, 47% of all hospitals were using or planning to use the EDACP. Uptake was more likely in community hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Ontario adult asthma ED visitors are more often women. Asthma-related return visits are uncommon, but significantly higher in small community hospitals. This provincial QI initiative reached almost 75% of Ontario EDs, and achieved almost 50% implementation rate within 2 years. Factors other than workshop attendance, such as hospital size, were associated with EDACP implementation.