Compensatory adjustments in motor unit behavior during fatigue differ for younger versus older men.

BACKGROUND: The ability to maintain a submaximal force as a muscle fatigues is supplemented by compensatory adjustments in the nervous system's control of motor units. AIM: We sought to compare vastus lateralis motor unit recruitment and firing rate data for younger versus older men during isometric fatigue. METHODS: Twelve younger (age = 25 ± 3 years) and 12 older (75 ± 8 years) men performed contractions of the knee extensors at 50% of maximal voluntary contraction force until exhaustion. Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals were detected from the vastus lateralis. A sEMG signal decomposition algorithm was used to quantify the motor unit action potential (MUAP) amplitude, mean firing rates, and recruitment threshold of each motor unit. For the latter two variables, our analyses only included motor units that featured similar action potential amplitude throughout the protocol. RESULTS: There was no group difference for time to task failure (p = 0.362, d = 0.381). Both groups showed increases in MUAP amplitude [younger and older slopes = 0.0174 ± 0.0123 and 0.0073 ± 0.0123 mV/contraction, respectively (p = 0.082, d = 0.710)], but the change was more linear for the younger men (mean r2 values = 0.565 and 0.455). Mean firing rates increased over time for the younger (p < 0.001), but not the older (p = 0.579), men. Similarly, recruitment thresholds decreased for younger men (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We propose that aging results in neuromuscular impairments that hinder older adults' ability to make compensatory adjustments in motor unit control during fatigue.

No acute effects of placebo or open-label placebo treatments on strength, voluntary activation, and neuromuscular fatigue.

PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests that deception may not be necessary for placebos to improve clinical outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that placebo and open-label placebo (OLP) treatments would acutely improve strength and voluntary activation, as well as minimize neuromuscular fatigue, in untrained participants. METHODS: Twenty-one males (n = 11) and females (n = 10) visited the laboratory on three occasions (placebo, OLP, control) to receive each treatment in a randomized, counter-balanced manner. Trials involved a pretest, a 15-min intervention, and posttests. For the placebo trial, participants were informed that they would be ingesting a capsule that would improve their performance and make them feel more energetic. For the OLP intervention, participants were told that the capsules would have no effects. In "Experiment #1", knee extensor maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) peak torque and percent voluntary activation were evaluated. In "Experiment #2", participants performed 20 consecutive MVCs while surface electromyographic signals were detected from the vastus lateralis. Subjective assessments of energy and perceived exertion were examined. RESULTS: The interventions had no effect on strength or voluntary activation, but energy levels increased following treatments (p = 0.016, η2 = 0.257). Neither treatment influenced neuromuscular fatigue. Though some variables showed moderate-to-large effect sizes, these results were consistent for individuals with lower voluntary activation. CONCLUSION: Placebo and OLP treatments had minimal influence on strength, voluntary activation, and fatigue resistance. As these findings differ from recent reports, we speculate that placebos and OLPs are more likely to enhance muscle function in patient populations seeking medical care.