Effect of Topical Nasal Anesthetic on Comfort and Swallowing in High-Resolution Impedance Manometry.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Use of topical nasal anesthetic (TNA) is common in high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM). This study investigated the effect of TNA on swallowing and procedure tolerability during HRIM with a 4.2-mm catheter, a more commonly used catheter size with impedance capabilities. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised experimental study with blinding of participants. METHODS: Twenty healthy participants (mean age = 33 years, 16 female) were randomized to undergo HRIM using the ManoScan™ ESO Z 4.2-mm catheter twice, 1 week apart, under two conditions: with TNA (viscous lidocaine) and with placebo. Analyses included esophageal data of three saliva, three saline (5 mL), and three bread swallows (2 cm × 2 cm) performed while reclined 45°, and pharyngeal data under the same conditions while seated upright. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) HRIM parameters were analyzed using the Swallow Gateway analysis platform. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores rating procedural comfort were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant physiological differences in pharyngeal and UES parameters between conditions. There were also no significant differences in VAS scores under placebo (mean = 54.8, standard deviation (SD) = 19.3) and TNA (mean = 60.0, SD = 21.9) (t[19] = -0.9, P = .4) conditions; however, there was a significant difference in the first versus second session (t[19]) = 5.1, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: TNA did not improve comfort, but it also did not significantly affect swallowing behavior. There was, however, a practice effect regardless of TNA use with improved tolerance of the 4.2-mm catheter and likely more natural swallowing behavior during the second session of HRIM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:2124-2131, 2022.

Potential for Behavioural Pressure Modulation at the Upper Oesophageal Sphincter in Healthy Swallowing.

Supratentorial structures are known to be involved in the neural control of swallowing, thus the potential for volitional manipulation of pharyngeal swallowing is of rehabilitative interest. The extent of volitional control of the upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) during swallowing remains unclear. Prior research has shown that the UOS opening duration can be volitionally prolonged during execution of the Mendelsohn manoeuvre, which does not change the UOS opening time in isolation but the swallowing response in its entirety. This study explored the capacity of healthy adults to increase the period of pressure drop in the region of the UOS (UOS-Pdrop) during swallowing, through volitional UOS pressure modulation in the absence of altered pharyngeal pressure. The period of UOS-Pdrop was used as a proxy of UOS opening duration that is associated with a pressure decrease at the region of the UOS. Six healthy adults were seen 45 min daily for 2 weeks and for one follow-up session. During training, high-resolution manometry contour plots were provided for visual biofeedback. Participants were asked to maximally prolong the blue period on the monitor (period of UOS-Pdrop) without altering swallowing biomechanics. Performance was assessed prior to training start and following training. There was evidence within the first session for task-specific volitional prolongation of the period of UOS-Pdrop during swallowing with biofeedback; however, performance was not enhanced with further training. This may suggest that the amount to which the period of UOS-Pdrop may be prolonged is restricted in healthy individuals. The findings of this study indicate a potential of healthy adults to volitionally prolong UOS opening duration as measured by the period of pressure drop at the region of the UOS. Further research is indicated to evaluate purposeful pressure modulation intra-swallow in patient populations with UOS dysfunction to clarify if the specificity of behavioural treatment may be increased.

Potential for Volitional Control of Resting Pressure at the Upper Oesophageal Sphincter in Healthy Individuals.

Resting pressure at the upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) has been reported to be susceptible to factors such as emotional stress or respiration. This exploratory study investigated the potential for behavioural modulation of UOS resting pressure in healthy adults to increase our understanding of volitional control of UOS pressure, and the potential development of rehabilitation approaches. Six healthy adults were seen one hour daily for two weeks (10 days) and for one post-training session after a training break of two weeks. Manipulation of UOS resting pressure was practised during a protocol of alternating increased and decreased pressure. A high-resolution manometry contour plot was used as a biofeedback modality. Participants were asked to explore how to achieve warmer and cooler colours (pressure increase and decrease, respectively) at the UOS resting pressure band, without changing head position or manipulating activity of other muscles. Performance was analysed prior to training start and following daily training. Participants were able to increase resting pressure following one week of practice; however, there was no evidence for purposeful pressure decrease. The increased resting pressure achieved by participants indicates a capacity for purposeful pressure modulation given intensive biofeedback training. The lack of volitional reduction in pressure may be explained by sustained pressure generation due to the intrinsic muscular characteristics of the UOS and a flooring effect in healthy subjects, in whom physiology mandates a minimum degree of resting pressure to fulfil the barrier function. Distention caused by the presence of the intraluminal catheter cannot be ruled out.