Delayed sphincter repair for obstetric ruptures: analysis of failure.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the clinical results after anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma and to evaluate possible risk factors for poor outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In years 1990-99 anterior anal sphincter repair for anal incontinence due to obstetric trauma was performed in 39 patients at Helsinki University Central Hospital. Clinical examination with Parks' classification and patients' questionnaire with endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) were done before and after surgery. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was measured postoperatively. The median follow-up time after the operation was 22 months (range 2-99). RESULTS: The follow-up results of the patients' questionnaire for 12 patients (31%) were good, for 15 patients (38%) acceptable and for 12 patients (31%) poor. Postoperative EAUS showed sphincter overlap in 28 (72%) patients but a defect was still found in 11 (28%) patients. A defect found on postoperative EAUS correlated with poor clinical result according to Parks' (R = 0.8, P < 0.01) and patients' questionnaire results (R = 0.7, P < 0.01). Patients with poor clinical results (Parks III/IV) were statistically significantly older (median 63 years, range 26-73) than those with favourable results (Parks I/II) (median 45 years, range 27-79) (P < 0.05). Further, the duration of incontinence symptoms correlated with poor functional results (R=0.4, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: After obstetric trauma anterior anal repair gives acceptable short-term clinical results. EAUS investigation is easy and harmless to perform and should be used pre- and post-operatively. Advanced age, pre-operative signs of perineal descent, long-lasting severe incontinence symptoms and a persistent defect on postoperative EAUS seem to be related to poor clinical result.

Comparison of urine trypsinogen-2 test strip with serum lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The accuracy of a new rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip (actim Pancreatitis) was compared with that of serum lipase for detection of acute pancreatitis in patients with acute abdominal pain. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study was conducted which consisted of 237 consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain admitted to the emergency unit at Helsinki University Central Hospital. The patients were tested on admission with the actim Pancreatitis test strip. Serum amylase, serum lipase, and urine trypsinogen-2 concentrations were also determined quantitatively. RESULTS: The actim Pancreatitis test strip result was positive in 27 out of 29 patients with acute pancreatitis (sensitivity 93%) and in 16 of 208 patients with non-pancreatic abdominal pain (specificity 92%). This was superior to that of serum lipase (sensitivity 79% and specificity 88%). With a cut-off > 3x the upper reference limit, the sensitivity of serum lipase was only 55% while the specificity was 99%. The high sensitivity for the actim Pancreatitis test strip resulted in a very high negative predictive value of 99%. All six patients with severe acute pancreatitis were detected by the dipstick. With a higher cut-off value (> 3x upper reference limit) for lipase, two patients with severe acute pancreatitis remained undetected. Combining the actim Pancreatitis dipstick with serum lipase a positive predictive value of 94% was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Acute pancreatitis can be excluded with a higher probability with the actim Pancreatitis strip than with serum lipase determination, and therefore appears to be more suitable for screening of acute pancreatitis. With its high specificity with a cut-off > 3x the upper reference limit, serum lipase is suitable as a confirmatory test for pancreatitis when a positive dipstick result is obtained.

Predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis by rapid measurement of trypsinogen-2 in urine.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of patients at risk of developing a severe attack of acute pancreatitis (AP) is of great importance because rapid therapeutic interventions improve outcome. At a cutoff of 50 microg/L, trypsinogen-2 measured by a rapid urinary dipstick is a sensitive and specific diagnostic test in AP. The trypsinogen-2 concentration correlates with the severity of the disease, and a test with a higher cutoff might therefore be useful for prediction of disease severity. METHODS: We increased the detection limit of the urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip (Actim Pancreatitis) from 50 microg/L to 2000 microg/L and evaluated the prognostic value of this test. The results were compared with those obtained with serum C-reactive protein and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score. The study population consisted of 150 consecutive patients with AP (42 with severe disease). RESULTS: The sensitivity of the rapid urinary test strip (detection limit, 2000 microg/L) for prediction of severe AP, both on admission and at 24 h, was 62%; specificities were 87% and 85%, respectively, positive predictive values were 65% and 62%, and negative predictive values were 85% and 85%. C-Reactive protein had a sensitivity of only 38% on admission, but at 24 h, it was 83%; specificities were 90% and 70%, respectively, whereas positive predictive values were 59% and 52%, and NPVs were 79% and 91%, respectively. On admission the positive-likelihood ratio for the urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip was 4.8, and at 24 h it was 4.2; for C-reactive protein, the values were 3.7 and 2.7, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The urinary trypsinogen-2 dipstick is a simple and rapid method for prediction of severe acute pancreatitis.

Cellular markers of systemic inflammation and immune suppression in patients with organ failure due to severe acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on cellular markers of systemic inflammation and immune suppression in early acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to describe the cellular immune inflammatory status of patients with acute pancreatitis in relation to development of organ failure. METHODS: Prospective study including 89 patients who presented within 72 h of onset of pain. Fifty-eight of them had mild disease (Grade I group), 19 had severe disease with no organ dysfunction (Grade II group) and 12 had severe disease with organ dysfunction (Grade III group). Serial blood samples were collected on admission and following 2 days. Phagocyte surface markers were analysed using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The proportion of HLA-DR-positive monocytes, a marker of immune suppression, and CD11b expression level on neutrophils and monocytes, a marker of systemic inflammation, were related to Grades I-III (P for trend <0.001). In Grade III patients, the proportion of HLA-DR-positive monocytes was low on presentation, or decreased rapidly during follow-up, whereas CD11b expression levels were persistently high. L-selectin and monocyte CD14 expression levels were not related to disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Immune suppression develops early, rapidly and unexpectedly in patients with acute pancreatitis. Monitoring immune inflammatory status may provide the means by which to identify patients who benefit from biological response modifier therapy.

Procalcitonin strip test in the early detection of severe acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of patients who subsequently develop severe acute pancreatitis would enable the selection of patients who may benefit from early intensive management. Because severe acute pancreatitis is characterized by the development of systemic inflammation the authors studied whether procalcitonin, a marker of systemic inflammation, differentiated between patients with mild and severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS: On admission and 24 h thereafter, serum procalcitonin level was measured by a rapid, semiquantitative PCT-Q test and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) by an immunoturbidimetric method in a consecutive series of 162 patients with acute pancreatitis. There were 38 severe and 124 mild cases. The accuracy of procalcitonin and CRP in predicting severe acute pancreatitis was compared with that of Ranson and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores. RESULTS: The PCT-Q test was more accurate in predicting severe acute pancreatitis (sensitivity 92 per cent and specificity 84 per cent at 24 h) than CRP, APACHE II score and Ranson score. Its negative predictive value was high (97 per cent at 24 h), and it detected each patient who developed subsequent organ failure (n = 22). CONCLUSION: The PCT-Q test was a useful screening method for detecting severe acute pancreatitis. It is simple and quick to perform and, unlike currently available multiple factor scoring systems, can easily be adopted into routine clinical practice.

Procalcitonin, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, and soluble E-selectin in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether marker(s) of systemic inflammation detect, at an early stage of acute pancreatitis, patients who may ultimately develop severe disease. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University hospital emergency unit. PATIENTS: Thirty patients with mild acute pancreatitis (SEV0 group) and 27 with severe acute pancreatitis. Of the latter, 11 did not develop organ failure (SEV1 group), whereas the other 16 patients developed acute respiratory failure and 9 of them also developed renal failure (SEV2 group). INTERVENTIONS: Blood samples were collected at admission to the hospital (T0), and at 12 hrs (T12) and 24 hrs (T24 after admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The plasma concentrations of procalcitonin (PCT), soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), and the serum concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) were monitored. PCT levels at T0 were significantly higher in the SEV1 group (median 0.4 ng/mL, range 0.2-2.3) and the SEV2 group (0.8 ng/mL, 0.2-73.5) than in the SEV0 group (0.3 ng/mL, 0.1-3, p < .05 and p < .001, respectively). At T12, PCT level in the SEV2 group was significantly higher than that in the SEV1 group (2.2 ng/mL, 0.2-86.6 vs. 0.4 ng/mL, 0.3-2.8, p = .05), as it also was at T24 (2.2 ng/mL, 0.4-73.3 vs. 0.5 ng/mL, 0.3-4, p < .01). Among SEV2 patients, PCT concentration correlated negatively with the time elapsed between admission and the diagnosis of organ failure. At T12, sIL-2R levels of the SEV1 group (1,011 U/mL, range 334-2,211) and the SEV2 group (1,495 U/ml, range 514-4,526) both differed significantly from the SEV0 group (636 U/ml, range 356-1,678, p < .05 and p < .001, respectively) as they also did at T24. Although CRP level in the SEV1 group at T12 did not differ from the SEV0 group, the difference between SEV2 (272 microg/mL, range 46-462) and SEV0 was significant (53 microg/mL, range 5-243, p < 0.01). sE-selectin levels did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: At admission to hospital, concentrations of PCT, but not those of CRP, sE-selectin, or sIL-2R, are higher in patients with severe acute pancreatitis than in patients with mild pancreatitis. PCT test had sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 73% for development of organ failure. PCT may be useful to identify the patients who benefit from novel therapies aimed at modifying the course of systemic inflammation.

Postoperative discitis: outcome and late magnetic resonance image evaluation of ten patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: MRI has proven to be the most effective method for demonstrating suspected postoperative discitis. The prognosis of discitis varies markedly in different series. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcome and late MRI findings of the patients with postoperative discitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical records of ten patients with discitis and of ten patients without infectious findings following lumbar discectomy in 1993 to 1995 were reviewed. A clinical follow-up investigation with a detailed questionnaire and MRI was performed. Without knowledge of the clinical history, a radiologist selected the cases of discitis based on evaluation of the MRI pictures, and thereafter after a combined analysis of preoperative CT scans and of the MRI pictures. RESULTS: The follow-up MRI demonstrated characteristic findings in every discitis case. However, similar changes were seen in four cases of the control group. The discitis group had more symptoms, a longer sick leave and less return to previous occupation than the control group. CONCLUSION: As a late examination, MRI is insufficient in itself for diagnosis of earlier discitis. Postoperative discitis lengthens the sick leave markedly. Patients with postoperative discitis are rarely capable to return to a physically strenuous work. Every effort, including antibiotic prophylaxis, should be undertaken to reduce the risk of this serious complication.