RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy has advantages over the traditional bilateral neck exploration for the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. It requires accurate localisation of the parathyroid pathology prior to surgery. The best method of preoperative localisation in a district general hospital setting is not well understood. METHODS: All patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism from 2008 to 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Operative findings were correlated with radiological and histological results. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, sestamibi scintigraphy and the two together were calculated for diagnostic precision and compared. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 81.5% had a histological diagnosis of a parathyroid adenoma. Ultrasound had higher sensitivity than sestamibi scintigraphy. Used together, ultrasound and sestamibi scintigraphy performed better than either ultrasound or sestamibi scintigraphy alone (P< 0.001). Twenty-two of 184 cases had no lesion located by either ultrasound or sestamibi scintigraphy preoperatively. Where neither ultrasound nor sestamibi scintigraphy located the lesion, additional computed tomography led to the excision of parathyroid pathology in one in ten patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of ultrasound and sestamibi scintigraphy provides the highest sensitivity of preoperative localisation. This approach led to a high success rate of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Where preoperative localisation is not achieved with ultrasound or sestamibi scintigraphy, computed tomography adds little additional benefit. In this setting other modalities of localisation such a selective venous sampling, intraoperative methylene blue or intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels could be considered.
