Implication of Hypotension in the Pathogenesis of Cognitive Impairment and Brain Injury in Chronic Liver Disease.

The incidence of chronic liver disease is on the rise. One of the primary causes of hospital admissions for patients with cirrhosis is hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a debilitating neurological complication. HE is defined as a reversible syndrome, yet there is growing evidence stating that, under certain conditions, HE is associated with permanent neuronal injury and irreversibility. The pathophysiology of HE primarily implicates a strong role for hyperammonemia, but it is believed other pathogenic factors are involved. The fibrotic scarring of the liver during the progression of chronic liver disease (cirrhosis) consequently leads to increased hepatic resistance and circulatory anomalies characterized by portal hypertension, hyperdynamic circulatory state and systemic hypotension. The possible repercussions of these circulatory anomalies on brain perfusion, including impaired cerebral blood flow (CBF) autoregulation, could be implicated in the development of HE and/or permanent brain injury. Furthermore, hypotensive insults incurring during gastrointestinal bleed, infection, or liver transplantation may also trigger or exacerbate brain dysfunction and cell damage. This review will focus on the role of hypotension in the onset of HE as well as in the occurrence of neuronal cell loss in cirrhosis.

Targeting Uric Acid Prevents Brain Injury and Anxiety in a Rat Model of Hemorrhagic Shock.

ABSTRACT: Secondary brain injury following hemorrhagic shock (HS) is a frequent complication in patients, even in the absence of direct brain trauma, leading to behavioral changes and more specifically anxiety and depression. Despite preclinical studies showing inflammation and apoptosis in the brain after HS, none have addressed the impact of circulating mediators. Our group demonstrated an increased uric acid (UA) circulation in rats following HS. Since UA is implicated in endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory response, we hypothesized UA could alter the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and impact the brain. Male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to: SHAM, HS (hemorrhagic shock) and HS + U (hemorrhagic shock + 1.5 mg/kg of uricase). The uricase intervention, specifically targeting UA, was administered during fluid resuscitation. It prevented BBB dysfunction (fluorescein sodium salt permeability and expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1) following HS. As for neuroinflammation, all of the results obtained (MPO activity; Iba1 and GFAP expression) showed a significant increase after HS, also prevented by the uricase. The same pattern was observed after quantification of apoptosis (caspase-3 activity and TUNEL) and neurodegeneration (Fluoro-Jade). Finally, the forced swim, elevated plus maze, and social interaction tests detected anxiety-like behavior after HS, which was blunted in rats treated with the uricase. In conclusion, we have identified UA as a new circulatory inflammatory mediator, responsible for brain alterations and anxious behavior after HS in a murine model. The ability to target UA holds the potential of an adjunctive therapeutic solution to reduce brain dysfunction related to hemorrhagic shock in human.

Impact of uric acid on liver injury and intestinal permeability following resuscitated hemorrhagic shock in rats.

BACKGROUND: Multiorgan failure is a consequence of severe ischemia-reperfusion injury after traumatic hemorrhagic shock (HS), a major cause of mortality in trauma patients. Circulating uric acid (UA), released from cell lysis, is known to activate proinflammatory and proapoptotic pathways and has been associated with poor clinical outcomes among critically ill patients. Our group has recently shown a mediator role for UA in kidney and lung injury, but its role in liver and enteric damage after HS remains undefined. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the role of UA on liver and enteric injury after resuscitated HS. METHODS: A murine model of resuscitated HS was treated during resuscitation with a recombinant uricase, a urate oxidase enzyme (rasburicase; Sanofi-Aventis, Canada Inc, Laval, Canada), to metabolize and reduce circulating UA. Biochemical analyses (liver enzymes, liver apoptotic, and inflammatory markers) were performed at 24 hours and 72 hours after HS. Physiological testing for enteric permeability and gut bacterial product translocation measurement (plasma endotoxin) were performed 72 hours after HS. In vitro, HT-29 cells were exposed to UA, and the expression of intercellular adhesion proteins (ZO-1, E-cadherin) was measured to evaluate the influence of UA on enteric permeability. RESULTS: The addition of uricase to resuscitation significantly reduced circulating and liver UA levels after HS. It also prevented HS-induced hepatolysis and liver apoptotic/inflammatory mediators at 24 hours and 72 hours. Hemorrhagic shock-induced enteric hyperpermeability and endotoxemia were prevented with uricase. CONCLUSIONS: After resuscitated HS, UA is an important mediator in liver and enteric injury. Uric acid represents a therapeutic target to minimize organ damage in polytrauma patients sustaining HS.

Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact.

BACKGROUND: Haemostasis and correction of hypovolemia are the pillars of early haemorrhage shock (HS) management. Vasopressors, which are not recommended as first-line therapy, are an alternative to aggressive fluid resuscitation, but data informing the risks and benefits of vasopressor therapy as fluid-sparing strategy is lacking. We aimed to study its impact on end organs, in the setting of a haemodynamic response to the initial volume resuscitation. METHODS: Following controlled HS (60 min) induced by blood withdrawal, under anaesthesia and ventilation, male Wistar rats (N = 10 per group) were randomly assigned to (1) sham, (2) HS with fluid resuscitation only [FR] and (3) HS with fluid resuscitation to restore haemodynamic (MAP: mean arterial pressure) then norepinephrine [FR+NE]. After a reperfusion time (60 min) during which MAP was maintained with fluid or norepinephrine, equipment was removed and animals were observed for 24 h (N = 5) or 72 h (N = 5) before euthanasia. Besides haemodynamic parameters, physiological markers (creatinine, lactate, pH, PaO2) and one potential contributor to vasoplegia (xanthine oxidase activity) were measured. Apoptosis induction (caspase 3), tissue neutrophil infiltration (MPO: myeloperoxidase) and illustrative protein markers were measured in the lung (Claudin-4), kidney (KIM-1) and brain amygdala (Iba1). RESULTS: No difference was present in MAP levels during HS or reperfusion between the two resuscitation strategies. FR required significantly more fluid than FR+NE (183% vs 106% of bleed-out volume; p = 0.003), when plasma lactate increased similarly. Xanthine oxidase was equally activated in both HS groups. After FR+NE, creatinine peaked higher but was similar in all groups at later time points. FR+NE enhanced MPO in the lung, when Claudin-4 increased significantly after FR. In the brain amygdala, FR provoked more caspase 3 activity, MPO and microglial activation (Iba1 expression). CONCLUSION: Organ resuscitation after controlled HS can be assured with lesser fluid administration followed by vasopressors administration, without signs of dysoxia or worse evolution. Limiting fluid administration could benefit the brain and seems not to have a negative impact on the lung or kidney.