Physiotherapist- and patient-reported barriers to guideline implementation of active physiotherapeutic management of low back pain: A theory-informed qualitative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Adoption of low back pain (LBP) guidelines in physiotherapeutic management is a well-documented problem. Thereby, an in-depth understanding of the barriers to implement an active approach for both patients and physiotherapists is needed. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with physiotherapists and patients with non-specific LBP. Interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. RESULTS: A total of 20 participants were interviewed, including ten physiotherapists and ten patients. Our findings reveal that patients and physiotherapists face each 23 barriers spanning 14 TDF domains. The TDF domain "social influences" revealed the most barriers, followed by "beliefs about consequences" and "environmental context" for patients and physiotherapists, respectively. Five barriers did overlap between both groups (lack of guideline awareness, incorrect exercise performance, interdisciplinary communication gaps, time constraints and challenges in patient compliance). CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to LBP guideline recommended physiotherapeutic practices span all 14 TDF domains. Consequently, future implementation interventions need to address multiple TDF domains for effective LBP guideline implementation.

Survivors of avalanche accidents: posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and quality of life: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: As any traumatic event, avalanches could trigger psychological disorders on survivors. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder among avalanche survivors and to evaluate post-traumatic stress disorder risks factors as well as the impact on quality of life. METHODS: A multicentre study was conducted in victims included in the North Alpine Avalanche Registry from 2014 to 2018. Data were collected through a standard questionnaire during semi-directed phone interviews. The primary outcome was the total score on the Impact of Event Scale Revised. Secondary outcomes were the Mental Component Scale and the Physical Component Scale scores of the Short Form 12 questionnaire. RESULTS: During the study period, 132 of 211 victims survived. Among the 107 victims included, 55 (51.4%) phone interviews were obtained. Six patients (10.9, 95% CI 1.76-20.05) had an Impact of Event Scale Revised score ≥ 33 indicating a strong probability for post-traumatic stress disorder. Median Mental Component Scale score was 39.0 (IQR 30.5-46.3) for post-traumatic stress disorder patients and 40.1 (IQR 36.5-43.4) for non post-traumatic stress disorder (p = 0.76). Median Physical Component Scale score was 39.4 (37.2-44.3) for post-traumatic stress disorder patients and 44.2 (39.1-46.8) for non post-traumatic stress disorder (p = 0.39). No significant difference in the quality of life in both populations was observed, and no independent risk factors of post-traumatic stress disorder was identified. CONCLUSION: Avalanche accidents may induce post-traumatic stress disorders among survivors in a comparable prevalence to the most traumatic event already studied. Early recognition and preventive measures should be set up in order to reduce the psychological burden in these victims. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03936738 .