Management of Anxiety for Ambulatory Hallux Valgus Surgery With a Virtual Reality Hypnosis Mask: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of using virtual reality masks for the management of preoperative anxiety and its impact on postoperative and predischarge anxiety as well as postoperative analgesia during outpatient hallux valgus surgery. METHODS: From June 2020 to September 2021, preoperative anxiety of patients scheduled for a percutaneous hallux valgus surgery were analyzed using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire completed during the consultation. All patients with major anxiety, defined as a STAI score above 40, were included in a randomized prospective comparative single-center study. Sixty patients were included in the study and randomized into 2 arms of 30 patients according to whether or not they underwent a preoperative hypnosis session with a virtual reality mask before surgery. RESULTS: There was an improvement in the postoperative (42.5 vs 45.2, P < .04) and predischarge (25.3 vs 30.2 P < .03) anxiety scores in the group that used the mask before the procedure. There was a notable decrease in immediate higher-level postoperative analgesics such as morphine or ketamine (3.3% vs 26.6%, P < .03) in the arm using the mask. CONCLUSION: In this study cohort undergoing percutaneous hallux valgus surgery, we found that use of a virtual reality hypnosis mask before surgery modestly reduced postoperative and predischarge anxiety as well as early postoperative consumption of higher-level analgesics in adults with significant preoperative anxiety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Anterior glenoid bone reconstruction and anterior latissimus transfer for failed Latarjet associated with irreparable subscapularis tear.

Background: Management of combined persistent anterior glenoid bone deficiency with irreparable subscapularis tear can be very complicated and challenging especially if associated with arthritis. The objective of this study was to report the outcome of combined reconstruction of the anterior glenoid with bone autograft or allograft with additional anterior latissimus transfer to reconstruct irreparable subscapularis tear with or without humeral head replacement. Methods: Nineteen patients (average age 29 years old) who underwent open anterior glenoid bone reconstruction with iliac crest bone autograft or ostechondral bone allograft (distal tibia or glenoid allograft), with anterior latissimus transfer to reconstruct irreparable subscapularis tear with or without humeral head replacement were included in this study. Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative pain score, visual analog scale, Subjective Shoulder Value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant Score. Results: Out of the 19 patients, 5 patients underwent humeral resurfacing arthroplasty. Anterior glenoid bone reconstruction was performed with iliac crest bone autograft in 8 patients, glenoid osteochondral allograft in 7 patients, and tibial plafond in 4 patients. At mean 31-month follow-up of (13-63 months), 15 patients (79%) considered their shoulder stable and were able to return to their work and 14 (74%) patients returned to their sport activity. Redislocation had occurred in 1 of the 18 shoulders (5%), subluxation had occurred in 3 patients (16%) of the shoulders and apprehension was reported for 4 patients, 21% of the operated shoulders. All outcome measures showed significant improvement compared to before surgery. No intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were observed. Four patients (21%) had to be revised to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Conclusion: The combination of anterior latissimus transfer, anterior glenoid bone grafting with or without humeral head resurfacing is an effective salvage surgical reconstruction that can stabilize shoulders in the setting of recurrent anterior instability after a failed Latarjet with an irreparable subscapularis tear. This could be a potential alternative reconstruction option that might be offered to patients with this difficult problem. Long-term outcome is needed to better evaluate the validity of this technique.

Risk of simultaneous and delayed breakage of total hip replacement ceramic implants in patients with trauma induced periprosthetic fracture and acetabular shell loosening.

BACKGROUND: Ceramic implant breakage (CIB) in total hip replacement (THR) is a rare incident. A confusion exists between the fragile mechanical behaviour of ceramic materials (brittleness) and fragility in the common sense (easy to break), leading to the misconception that trauma is to blame for these breakages. Trauma has been reported as a cause of breakage by several authors and it is debated whether the burst force can be reached in one single trauma in-vivo. We did a retrospective investigation aiming to determine the risk of CIB associated with a major trauma defined as a periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) or a traumatic loosening of the acetabular shell (TLAS) in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THR. HYPOTHESIS: The impact forces responsible of PPFF and TLAS, which are probably the most important impact forces sustained by patients, are not sufficient to induce immediate or delayed CIB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 31 patients (62 ceramic implants, 31 acetabular liners and 31 femoral heads) with a PPFF or TLAS between January 2010 and January 2022. We reviewed the records and X-rays at the time of the major trauma and at the last follow-up. We searched for simultaneous CIB, and those occurring on the non-explanted ceramic implants at last follow up (delayed CIB). These major traumas occurred in 9 men and 22 women. Median age was 75 years old [20-97years old]. There were 28 PPFF and 3 TLAS. Mean time from THR to trauma was 91.2±67months [2.4-240months]. RESULTS: On X-rays and after intraoperative confirmation, we do not report any simultaneous CIB on the 62 ceramic implants. Treatment consisted of internal fixation for 20 patients with preservation of both ceramic implants for Vancouver A, B1 and C fractures, 8 stem revisions with preservation of acetabular liner for Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures and 3 acetabular shell revisions to dual mobility and ceramic head change for TLAS. Thus, a total of 48 ceramic implants remained implanted (28 acetabular liners and 20 femoral heads). At last follow-up after the index revision (median=36 months [6-100months]), no patient had a delayed CIB. DISCUSSION: Major trauma resulting in a PPFF or TLAS in patient withs a CoC THR did not result in simultaneous CIB. The impact forces during these traumas are not sufficient to induce immediate breakage of the ceramic implants. At a median 3years follow-up we found no delayed CIB. Because CIB is a rare event, longer follow up and larger cohort study is needed to determine if a single high impact trauma can initiate and favour the spread of a crack in the ceramic material leading to a breakage. Considering the high mechanical resistance of the ceramic implants and the absence of CIB during or after a major trauma in our study, patients with CoC bearings should not be restricted in their daily activity to prevent CIB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective cohort study.