Risk factors for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection.

PURPOSE: The aim was to determine the factors related to acute kidney injury (AKI) in surgical septic patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (CIAI) and mortality associated to AKI. METHODS: An observational study was performed in patients with CIAI requiring surgery and ICU admission (June 2011-June 2013). Factors at admission associated with developing of AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) and association between mortality and AKI and RRT were studied. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were included. Developing of AKI was independently associated with the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (odds ratio [OR], 1.570; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.286-2.016) and creatinine at admission (OR for 0.1 units, 1.560; 95% CI, 1.296-1.990). Renal replacement therapy was independently associated with arterial hypertension (OR, 4.896; 95% CI, 1.501-15.971) and SOFA (OR, 1.713; 95% CI, 1.377-2.132). In another model with more predictive capacity, the number of previous medications that may alter renal function (OR, 3.732; 95% CI, 1.923-8.383) and SOFA (OR, 1.860; 95% CI, 1.469-2.541) were related to RRT. Both AKI and RRT were related to intensive care unit (P=.014 and P<.001, respectively) and 28-day mortality (P=.045 and P<.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Acute kidney injury in patients with CIAI is clearly associated with SOFA and creatinine at admission. Severe AKI with RRT need is highly associated with both previous arterial hypertension and the number of previous medications potentially affecting renal function.

Biomarkers (Procalcitonin, C Reactive Protein, and Lactate) as Predictors of Mortality in Surgical Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection.

BACKGROUND: An accurate and readily available biomarker for identifying patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection needing special attention in critical care units because of their greater risk of dying would be of value for intensivists. METHODS: A multi-center, observational, retrospective study explored blood lactate, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations, and also Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) as mortality predictors in all adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) admitted to Surgical Critical Care Units (SCCUs) for ≥48 h in four Spanish hospitals (June 2012-June 2013). Logistic regression models (step-wise procedure) were constructed using as dependent variables "intra-SCCU mortality" or "overall mortality," and variables showing differences (p≤0.1) in bivariate analyses as independent variables. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one cases were included. Mortality intra-SCCU (R(2)=0.189, p=0.001) was associated with SAPS II (categorized as high if ≥47) (OR=9.55; 95% CI, 1.09-83.85; p=0.042) and 24 h-lactate (≥5.87 categorized as high) (OR=6.90; 95% CI, 1.28-37.08). Overall mortality (R(2)=0.275, p=0.001) was associated with peak PCT (≥100 categorized as high) (OR=11.28; 95% CI, 1.80-70.20), peak lactate (≥1.8 categorized as high) (OR=8.86; 95% CI, 1.51-52.10) and SOFA at admission (≥7 categorized as high) (OR=8.14; 95% CI, 1.69-39.20), but was predicted better (R(2)=0.275, p=0.001) by a single dummy variable (high peak PCT-high peak lactate concentrations) (OR=99.11; 95% CI, 5.21-1885.97; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, SAPS II and 24 h-lactate concentrations predicted intra-SCCU mortality whereas overall mortality was predicted better by concurrent high PCT and lactate peak concentrations than by clinical scores or by each biomarker separately.

A practice-based observational study identifying factors associated with the use of high-dose tigecycline in the treatment of secondary peritonitis in severely ill patients.

INTRODUCTION: Based on tigecycline linear pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics, dose increases have been advocated to maximise activity especially when severe infections with high bacterial load and/or multidrug resistance are suspected. This practice-based observational study explored factors associated with tigecycline administration (100 mg/12h, 200 mg loading dose) in severely ill patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) admitted to four Surgical Critical Care Units (SCCUs). METHODS: Medical records of all consecutive adult patients with cIAI and controlled infection source requiring surgery and admission for ≥ 48 h to SCCU were reviewed and divided into patients treated with a regimen including tigecycline (tigecycline group) and those that not (control group). A logistic regression model was performed using "tigecycline administration" (dependent variable) and variables showing differences (p ≤ 0.1) in bivariate analyses (independent variables). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty one patients were included. In the tigecycline group, higher percentage of patients (vs. controls) presented colon as surgical site (66.7% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.006), nosocomial infection (55.6% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.001), mechanical ventilation (48.1% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.025), chronic renal replacement therapy (40.7% vs. 19.4%, p =0.008), septic shock (72.2% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.004), and higher values of SAPS II (48.0 ± 15.0 vs. 39.6 ± 15.5, p = 0.003), SOFA at admission (7.0 ± 3.3 vs. 5.5 ± 3.7, p = 0.020), lactate-24h (2.5 ± 2.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.9, p = 0.029) and CRP-72 h (207.4 ± 87.9 vs. 163.7 ± 76.8, p = 0.021). In the multivariate analysis (R2 = 0.187, p < 0.001) nosocomial infection (OR = 7.721; 95%CI = 2.193, 27.179; p = 0.001), colon as infection site (OR = 4.338; 95%CI = 1.432, 13.145; p = 0.009) and CRP-72 h (OR = 1.009 per-unit; 95%CI = 1.002, 1.016; p = 0.012) were associated with tigecycline administration. CONCLUSIONS: In severely ill patients with cIAI, high-dose tigecycline administration was associated with nosocomial origin of cIAI and colon as source infection site.

A practice-based observational study identifying factors associated with the use of high-dose tigecycline in the treatment of secondary peritonitis in severely ill patients

Introducción. Se han postulado incrementos en la dosis de tigeciclina basándose en su farmacocinética/farmacodinamia lineal, especialmente en infecciones graves con sospecha de alta carga bacteriana o/y multirresistencia. El presente estudio observacional basado en la práctica diaria explora los factores asociados con la administración de tigeciclina (100 mg/12h, 200 mg dosis de carga) en pacientes críticos con infección intraabdominal complicada (cIIA) ingresados en 4 Unidades de Cuidados Críticos Quirúrgicos (UCCQ). Métodos. Las historias clínicas de todos los pacientes adultos consecutivos con cIIA y foco de infección controlado que requerían cirugía e ingresaron en UCCQ durante ≥48h fueron revisadas y los pacientes fueron divididos en dos grupos: pacientes tratados con un régimen antibiótico que incluía tigeciclina (grupo tigeciclina) y aquellos que no (grupo control). Se realizó un modelo de regresión logística utilizando como variable dependiente la administración de tigeciclina y como independientes aquellas variables que mostraron diferencias (p≤0,1) en el análisis bivariado realizado. Resultados. Se incluyeron 121 pacientes. En el grupo tigeciclina, un mayor porcentaje de pacientes (vs. control) presentaban el colon como sitio quirúrgico (66,7% vs. 41,8%, p=0,006), infección nosocomial (55,6% vs. 26,9%, p=0,001), ventilación mecánica (48,1% vs. 28,4%, p=0,025), terapia renal sustitutoria (40,7% vs. 19,4%, p=0,008), shock séptico (72,2% vs. 46,3%, p=0,025) y valores más altos de SAPS II (48,0±15,0 vs. 39,6±15,5, p=0,003), SOFA al ingreso (7,0±3,3 vs. 5,5±3,7, p=0,020), lactato-24h (2,5±2,8 vs. 1,6±0,9, p=0,029) y PCR-72h (207,4±87,9 vs. 163,7±76,8, p=0,021). En el análisis multivariado (R2=0,187, p<0,001) la administración de tigeciclina se asoció con infección nosocomial (OR=7,721, 95%IC=2,193-27,179; p=0,001), colon como foco de infección (OR=4,338, 95%IC=1,432-13,145; p=0,009) y PCR-72h (OR=1,009 por unidad, 95%IC=1,002-1,016; p=0,012). Conclusiones. En pacientes críticos con cIIA, la administración de tigeciclina a dosis alta se asoció con el origen nosocomial de la infección y con el colon como foco de la misma (AU)

Introduction. Based on tigecycline linear pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics, dose increases have been advocated to maximise activity especially when severe infections with high bacterial load and/or multidrug resistance are suspected. This practice-based observational study explored factors associated with tigecycline administration (100 mg/12h, 200 mg loading dose) in severely ill patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) admitted to four Surgical Critical Care Units (SCCUs). Methods. Medical records of all consecutive adult patients with cIAI and controlled infection source requiring surgery and admission for ≥48h to SCCU were reviewed and divided into patients treated with a regimen including tigecycline (tigecycline group) and those that not (control group). A logistic regression model was performed using 'tigecycline administration' (dependent variable) and variables showing differences (p≤0.1) in bivariate analyses (independent variables). Results. One hundred and twenty one patients were included. In the tigecycline group, higher percentage of patients(vs. controls) presented colon as surgical site (66.7% vs. 41.8%, p=0.006), nosocomial infection (55.6% vs. 26.9%, p=0.001), mechanical ventilation (48.1% vs. 28.4%, p=0.025), chronic renal replacement therapy (40.7% vs. 19.4%, p=0.008), septic shock (72.2% vs. 46.3%, p=0.004), and higher values of SAPS II (48.0±15.0 vs. 39.6±15.5, p=0.003), SOFA at admission (7.0±3.3 vs. 5.5±3.7, p=0.020), lactate-24h (2.5±2.8 vs. 1.6±0.9, p=0.029) and CRP-72h (207.4±87.9 vs. 163.7±76.8, p=0.021). In the multivariate analysis (R2=0.187, p<0.001) nosocomial infection (OR=7.721; 95%CI=2.193, 27.179; p=0.001), colon as infection site (OR=4.338; 95%CI=1.432, 13.145; p=0.009) and CRP-72h (OR=1.009 per-unit; 95%CI=1.002, 1.016; p=0.012) were associated with tigecycline administration. Conclusions. In severely ill patients with cIAI, high-dose tigecycline administration was associated with nosocomial origin of cIAI and colon as source infection site (AU)

Micafungin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic adequacy for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofiltration.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of micafungin in patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients receiving CVVH treated with 100 mg/day micafungin were included (April-December 2012). CVVH was performed using polyethersulphone or polysulphone haemofilters. Dialysis membranes were not changed on sampling days. On Days 1 and 2, blood samples from arterial pre-filter and venous post-filter ports and ultrafiltrate samples were collected at the start and end of the infusion and at 3, 5, 8, 18 and 24 h. Concentrations were determined using HPLC. Values for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) were calculated. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using pre-filter and post-filter AUC0-24/MIC ratios on Days 1 and 2. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using AUC0-24/MIC cut-offs: 285 (C. parapsilosis), 3000 (all Candida spp.) and 5000 (non-parapsilosis Candida spp.). Cumulative fraction responses (CFRs) were calculated using EUCAST MIC distributions. RESULTS: Mean post-filter AUC0-24 (mg·h/L) values were higher than pre-filter values on Day 1 (83.31 ±â€Š15.87 versus 71.31 ±â€Š14.24; P = 0.008) and Day 2 (119.01 ±â€Š27.20 versus 104.54 ±â€Š21.23; P = 0.005). PTAs were ≥90% for MICs of 0.125 mg/L (cut-off = 285), 0.016 mg/L (cut-off = 3000) and 0.008 mg/L (cut-off = 5000) on Day 1, and for MICs of 0.25 mg/L (cut-off = 285) and 0.016 mg/L (cut-off = 3000 and 5000) on Day 2, without differences between pre- and post-filter values. On Day 2, CFRs >90% were obtained for C. albicans (cut-off = 3000 and 5000) and C. glabrata (cut-off = 3000), but not for C. parapsilosis. CONCLUSIONS: There was no removal of micafungin by CVVH or need for dose adjustment, and there was optimal PK/PD coverage for non-parapsilosis Candida and equivalence of pre- and post-filter PD.