Giving birth in Switzerland: a qualitative study exploring migrant women's experiences during pregnancy and childbirth in Geneva and Zurich using focus groups.

BACKGROUND: Migrant mothers in high-income countries often encounter more complications during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period. To enlighten health care providers concerning potential barriers, the objective of this study was to explore positive and negative experiences with maternal health services in the University Hospitals of Geneva and Zurich and to describe barriers to maternity services from a qualitative perspective. METHODS: In this qualitative study, six focus groups (FGs) were conducted involving 33 women aged 21 to 40 years. All FG discussions were audio-recorded and later transcribed. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach assisted by the Atlas.ti qualitative data management software. RESULTS: Positive experiences included not only the availability of maternity services, especially during emergency situations and the postpartum period, but also the availability of specific maternity services for undocumented migrants in Geneva. Negative experiences were classified into either personal or structural barriers. On the personal level, the main barriers were a lack of social support and a lack of health literacy, whereas the main themes on the structural level were language barriers and a lack of information. CONCLUSION: Structural adaptation is necessary to meet the needs of the extremely diverse population. The needs include (1) the provision of specific information for migrant women in multiple languages, (2) the availability of trained interpreters who are easily accessible to health care providers, (3) specifically trained nurses or social assistance providers to guide migrants through the health system, and (4) a cultural competence-training programme for health care providers.

Predicting response to psychopharmacological treatment: survey of recent results.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment with antidepressants and antipsychotics, though effective, is unspecific as agents that differ greatly in their biochemical and pharmacological actions have virtually the same efficacy. Half of the patients with initial improvement show incomplete response, while a large proportion of patients exhibit a refractory clinical picture which is resistant to all treatment modalities. METHODS: Our analyses were based on a reference study of 2,848 depressive inpatients under monotherapeutic treatment with 7 different antidepressants or placebo, along with a naturalistic study of depressive and schizophrenic patients (296 inpatients, 363 outpatients) under today's "standard" polypharmaceutic treatment regimens. RESULTS: The empirical data suggested the following predictors of response: (1) severity at baseline, (2) early onset of improvement, (3) unwanted side-effects, and (4) medical comorbidity. A combination of these predictors with Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) methods has direct clinical relevance. DISCUSSION: Evidence-based approaches to personalized treatment help improving the unsatisfactory situation patients and clinicians are faced with, given today's incomplete treatments and the fact that the mechanisms by which antidepressants and antipsychotics ultimately exert their therapeutic effects are only marginally understood.

[Community-based crisis home programme. Cost-efficient alternative to psychiatric hospitalization]. / Gemeindenahe psychiatrische Akutbehandlung in Gastfamilien. Kostengünstige Alternative zum Klinikaufenthalt bei hoher Patientenzufriedenheit.

BACKGROUND: Over recent decades, institutional psychiatric care has shifted its focus from traditional inpatient treatment to a variety of more advanced outpatient services. Within this context, a new "crisis home" programme (CHP) was launched in Zurich on 1 January 2005. With this programme, mentally ill patients can avoid hospitalization by living with a host family for a certain time period while receiving standard outpatient care. In this study we addressed the question of whether the quite substantial financial advantages of the Zurich CHP over traditional inpatient care are achieved at the expense of a reduced quality of care. SAMPLE AND METHODS: Between 1 January 2005 and 30 June 2007, a total of 33 patients enrolled in the Zurich CHP with an average stay of 19 days at host families. The vast majority of the patients (85%) were moderately to severely ill at study entry. Of these patients data were collected in a standardized way on the basis of five rating instruments. The statistical data analysis included cross-comparisons with corresponding inpatient data. RESULTS: Results showed that (1) the CHP works well in a routine setting and provides cost-efficient interventions for patients in acute crises; (2) the financial advantages of the Zurich host family programme over traditional inpatient care do not lead to a reduced quality in patient care; (3) patients suffering from severe mental illnesses clearly benefit from this programme, thus avoiding hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The Zurich CHP is a cost-efficient alternative to traditional inpatient treatment. Specifically, our results suggest that this type of acute crisis intervention should be established as a standard psychiatric care service.

Two-factor solution of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale confirmed.

The German version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) was studied in 277 medical students. The factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution, quite in agreement with the results of a recent analysis of the French version of the same scale. The first factor corresponds to the difficulties to identify and to describe feelings, whereas the second factor corresponds to the externally oriented thinking. TAS-20 proved to be a reliable scale to measure alexithymia; the usage of the total scale score is recommended.